Why is Charles Woodson unsigned? (1 Viewer)

[teamramrod]

he is a bad man.

Peace

 

[jurb26]

Because he's 34?

 

[Adam Harstad]

Because he's 34?

36, turns 37 in October.

 

[KingPrawn]

Because the best you could do is come up with a clip from his college days in 1997

 

[Alex P Keaton]

Go back and watch games when he was healthy last season. He's done. Could he be....a decent role player on a terrible defense? Sure. But that's not Chuck Woodson's style.

Much as it pains me, the old Woodson is gone.

 

[Touchdown There]

One of the greatest to ever play the game but he should retire.

 

[jurb26]

Because he's 34?

36, turns 37 in October.

Wow, now I'm feeling old too.

 

[sho nuff]

Go back and watch games when he was healthy last season. He's done. Could he be....a decent role player on a terrible defense? Sure. But that's not Chuck Woodson's style.

Much as it pains me, the old Woodson is gone.

There is a reason you did not see Packer fans shocked that he was let go...nor do you see them wanting him to return in any major role.

 

[FavreAndAwayAnIdiot]

He's a liability in coverage because he just doesn't have the speed anymore. He brings leadership only, at this point. If I had a young team with little to no chance of going anywhere-- and I could get CW cheap-- I'd do it. But he still wants to be paid like Charles Woodson the Pro-Bowl safety.

Therein lies the problem.