How do we know? He hasn't has the oppertunity yet. It still baffles me people have placed the stigma on this guy that he can't carry a full load when there isn't enough stats to date to warrant this thinking.Maybe Petrieno knows that Norwood can't carry the full load.
He had 99 carries last year, missed 2 games and was banged up in a few others...has thin legs, and I just can't see him being physically able to take the pounding. I am done doingspurs44 said:How do we know? He hasn't has the oppertunity yet. It still baffles me people have placed the stigma on this guy that he can't carry a full load when there isn't enough stats to date to warrant this thinking.Anthony Borbely said:Maybe Petrieno knows that Norwood can't carry the full load.
many atlanta natives would disagree with you there... petrino is not pulling a PR move by starting dunn over norwood... the best PR move would be winning some games, not playing musical RBs to be politically correct... it's obvious that petrino doesn't see norwood as an every down featured back (based on his offensive philosophy and the rbs he has featured in the past), and the only other guy on the roster capable of filling that role is dunn... i agree that norwood should get more touches, but i just don't see him getting 20+ touches a game...I'm a Norwood owner and I believe he will get more touches. But, I think one of the biggest reasons that Dunn will remain a visible and integral part of the Falcons plans has nothing to do with performance on the field. With the Vick fiasco still so fresh in the minds of Arthur Blank, management and Atlanta fans, I believe the team would be very reluctant to simply replace Dunn. He's one of the league's most well-known philanthropists and the very definition of a professional. His charity work in Atlanta and Florida is well documented and to Blank, this season is as much a P.R. campaign as it is a quest for the Super Bowl. Norwood is obviously the future, but unfortunately for Norwood owners such as myself, the future isn't now. I see a RBBC for this season with Norwood again showing big flashes but short of a Dunn injury, never getting the bulk of the carries.
Wow, clearly this one game should wipe out Dunn's whole career of excellence.Alluro said:Looking at the boxscore of the Atlanta game:Warrick Done: 22 carries, 55 ydsJerious Norwood: 5 carries, 33 ydsYou gotta figure Warrick will get the axed from the starting position very soon, but how soon?
You must not be watching the games OR looking at the stat lines these days.Must be a Norwood owner.............Probably because Dunn is the better back and gives the team the better chance to win![]()
You would be better off looking at our own site than pimping competitors.....September 10, 2007, 16:37mrspree15 said:From yahoo/kffl:
Sep 10 During his press conference, Atlanta Falcons head coach Bobby Petrino said he would like to make sure RB Jerious Norwood gets more touches. "We want to get the ball in Jerious' hands. He is a guy that has the speed and the ability to make big plays for us. We have to make sure that he gets more touches," said Petrino.
Maybe he can't pass protect...maybe he can't handle the pounding...maybe he's better getting a few carries fresh when the defense is more tired...maybe he's not smart enough to remember more than a handful of plays... I tend to lean toward the coach's who have been doing this for 20+ years and their decisions in matters like this since they see these players everyday and know what they can/can't do MUCH MUCH MUCH better than us fantasy geeks.spurs44 said:How do we know? He hasn't has the oppertunity yet. It still baffles me people have placed the stigma on this guy that he can't carry a full load when there isn't enough stats to date to warrant this thinking.Anthony Borbely said:Maybe Petrieno knows that Norwood can't carry the full load.
Norwood hasn't had 15 carries in his career yet and had 10 or more only 3 times (10, 10 and 13).I was so confused watching the stats of that Atl / Min game... it would be like Dunn for no gain / Dunn for 1 yd ..... then it would be Norwood for 7 ... then Dunn would get the next carry for 1 yd. I was like "come on." The match up isn't much better against Jac... But Norwood should get atleast 15 carries this week.Where are the Atl homers... there must be sometype of backlash over there for allowing one guy to go 22 for 55 yds while the younger; more exciting guy is 5 for 33 yds (almost a 7 YPC).
I wasn't intending to pimp a competitor, I happened to be on yahoo and I clicked on Norwood's note.You would be better off looking at our own site than pimping competitors.....September 10, 2007, 16:37mrspree15 said:From yahoo/kffl:
Sep 10 During his press conference, Atlanta Falcons head coach Bobby Petrino said he would like to make sure RB Jerious Norwood gets more touches. "We want to get the ball in Jerious' hands. He is a guy that has the speed and the ability to make big plays for us. We have to make sure that he gets more touches," said Petrino.
Falcons :: RB
HC Petrino Wants More Work For RB Norwood
Steve Wyche, Atlanta Journal-Constitution - [Full Article]
Atlanta Falcons HC Bobby Petrino said Monday that he is going to have to incorporate RB Jerious Norwood more into the game plan. Norwood touched the ball just seven times against Minnesota, averaging 6.6 yards on 5 runs, along with 2 catches for 24 yards.
http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-bl...d=blogs_falcons
One game against one of the top run defenses (the #1 last year), no less. Norwood will certainly get more carries, but I do think Dunn will remain the starter and get the lion's share of the carries.Wow, clearly this one game should wipe out Dunn's whole career of excellence.Alluro said:Looking at the boxscore of the Atlanta game:Warrick Done: 22 carries, 55 ydsJerious Norwood: 5 carries, 33 ydsYou gotta figure Warrick will get the axed from the starting position very soon, but how soon?
Maybe the coach has Dunn on HIS fantasy team!Maybe he can't pass protect...maybe he can't handle the pounding...maybe he's better getting a few carries fresh when the defense is more tired...maybe he's not smart enough to remember more than a handful of plays... I tend to lean toward the coach's who have been doing this for 20+ years and their decisions in matters like this since they see these players everyday and know what they can/can't do MUCH MUCH MUCH better than us fantasy geeks.spurs44 said:How do we know? He hasn't has the oppertunity yet. It still baffles me people have placed the stigma on this guy that he can't carry a full load when there isn't enough stats to date to warrant this thinking.Anthony Borbely said:Maybe Petrieno knows that Norwood can't carry the full load.
sorry dude, you're not beating a dead horse, you're repeating a fallacious argument that has little to any merit. By your logic, these backs are also unsuited to carry a full load: Laurence Maroney, Brian Westbrook, Travis Henry, Cedric Benson, Ahman Green, Willis McGahee, Sean Alexander, etc. Point is your argument is total crap. All RBs get knicked up, and if they're not starting when they do, they're more likely to sit than play-through the injury. Also, if you knew anything about his college career you'd know how stupid this sounds. Also don't see where you get skinny legs:He had 99 carries last year, missed 2 games and was banged up in a few others...has thin legs, and I just can't see him being physically able to take the pounding. I am done doingspurs44 said:How do we know? He hasn't has the oppertunity yet. It still baffles me people have placed the stigma on this guy that he can't carry a full load when there isn't enough stats to date to warrant this thinking.Anthony Borbely said:Maybe Petrieno knows that Norwood can't carry the full load.![]()
I agree with your point about all RBs getting dinged, but he does have skinny legs. It just jumps out at me when I watch him. However, that shouldn't stop him from getting more than 5 carries. He carried a full load in college, unlike a similarly built Auburn RB who gets often criticized here.sorry dude, you're not beating a dead horse, you're repeating a fallacious argument that has little to any merit. By your logic, these backs are also unsuited to carry a full load: Laurence Maroney, Brian Westbrook, Travis Henry, Cedric Benson, Ahman Green, Willis McGahee, Sean Alexander, etc. Point is your argument is total crap. All RBs get knicked up, and if they're not starting when they do, they're more likely to sit than play-through the injury. Also, if you knew anything about his college career you'd know how stupid this sounds. Also don't see where you get skinny legs:He had 99 carries last year, missed 2 games and was banged up in a few others...has thin legs, and I just can't see him being physically able to take the pounding. I am done doingspurs44 said:How do we know? He hasn't has the oppertunity yet. It still baffles me people have placed the stigma on this guy that he can't carry a full load when there isn't enough stats to date to warrant this thinking.Anthony Borbely said:Maybe Petrieno knows that Norwood can't carry the full load.![]()
http://i.a.cnn.net/si/multimedia/photo_gal...ges/norwood.jpg
Dude, he has skinny legs. He's built more like a WR than a RB.Also don't see where you get skinny legs:
http://i.a.cnn.net/si/multimedia/photo_gal...ges/norwood.jpg
Also don't see where you get skinny legs:
http://i.a.cnn.net/si/multimedia/photo_gal...ges/norwood.jpg
He's bigger than Dunn by a lot (5'11" 204 compared to 5'9" 180). Besides, have you seen how skinny Reggie Bush's legs are?I agree with your point about all RBs getting dinged, but he does have skinny legs. It just jumps out at me when I watch him. However, that shouldn't stop him from getting more than 5 carries. He carried a full load in college, unlike a similarly built Auburn RB who gets often criticized here.
I bet you don't even believe that.Must be a Norwood owner.............Probably because Dunn is the better back and gives the team the better chance to win![]()
Also don't see where you get skinny legs:
http://i.a.cnn.net/si/multimedia/photo_gal...ges/norwood.jpgThose are skinny legs.
Maybe he is a rookie coach who is more confident with a veteran rb to start the year then with a young rb. Maybe the coaching staff will start using Norwood more as he is clearly thier big play guy. My point is even though Dunn is the starter now, it's as obvious as the nose on your face that Norwood is going to get on the field more as evidenced by Petrino's latest comments. I still say that he will have a role similar to Bush this year and that he will get his chance to carry the load sometime this year. Can we at least agree that it takes more than one game before making some ridiculous comments that he is injury prone based on 99 carries!Maybe he can't pass protect...maybe he can't handle the pounding...maybe he's better getting a few carries fresh when the defense is more tired...maybe he's not smart enough to remember more than a handful of plays... I tend to lean toward the coach's who have been doing this for 20+ years and their decisions in matters like this since they see these players everyday and know what they can/can't do MUCH MUCH MUCH better than us fantasy geeks.spurs44 said:How do we know? He hasn't has the oppertunity yet. It still baffles me people have placed the stigma on this guy that he can't carry a full load when there isn't enough stats to date to warrant this thinking.Anthony Borbely said:Maybe Petrieno knows that Norwood can't carry the full load.
Jags gave up over 200yds and a TD to the Titans. Norwood may have a good time running this week.The match up isn't much better against Jac... But Norwood should get atleast 15 carries this week.
I think the injury prone label on most guys is ridiculous. It's the NFL and guys get hurt, nearly all of them. My basic point is just because a guy gets a better ypc in limited carries doesn't always mean that they are the better back or deserve to be the starter. It's certainly possible that Norwood will get more as the year goes on, it'll be interesting to watch....Maybe he is a rookie coach who is more confident with a veteran rb to start the year then with a young rb. Maybe the coaching staff will start using Norwood more as he is clearly thier big play guy. My point is even though Dunn is the starter now, it's as obvious as the nose on your face that Norwood is going to get on the field more as evidenced by Petrino's latest comments. I still say that he will have a role similar to Bush this year and that he will get his chance to carry the load sometime this year. Can we at least agree that it takes more than one game before making some ridiculous comments that he is injury prone based on 99 carries!Maybe he can't pass protect...maybe he can't handle the pounding...maybe he's better getting a few carries fresh when the defense is more tired...maybe he's not smart enough to remember more than a handful of plays... I tend to lean toward the coach's who have been doing this for 20+ years and their decisions in matters like this since they see these players everyday and know what they can/can't do MUCH MUCH MUCH better than us fantasy geeks.spurs44 said:How do we know? He hasn't has the oppertunity yet. It still baffles me people have placed the stigma on this guy that he can't carry a full load when there isn't enough stats to date to warrant this thinking.Anthony Borbely said:Maybe Petrieno knows that Norwood can't carry the full load.
I think all of you who are counting out Norwood's NFL potential due to his supposed "skinny legs" are confusing limb length with muscle mass. Norwood has extremely long limbs, which translates into elongated muscles. That has nothing to do with mass or strength. In fact, those people blessed with long limbs are typically stronger than those with short limbs and equivalent muscle mass. You can walk into any gym in the country and find guys that are 5'8'', with bloated arms, who can barely bench their weight and guys that are built like beanstalks who can rep out 315. I am not sure why long limbs, which are typically a positive for athletes, would be considered a negative for running backs.Besides, the notion that a RB with skinny legs can't be successful in the NFL is just idiotic.Also don't see where you get skinny legs:
http://i.a.cnn.net/si/multimedia/photo_gal...ges/norwood.jpgThose are skinny legs.
Maybe not for the average everyday person, but for an NFL running back they sure are. Most running backs have tree trunk legs.
Didn't Norwood lose some weight w/ a stomach illness towards the end of preseason? I have to agree w/ switz's post.I'm not sure why people are confused...Norwood was actually less healthy than Dunn as the season neared. That's why Dunn got the start.Norwood was eased in week 1, and will progressively get more carries over the course of the season.
Appreciate your imput. It will be fun to watch!I think the injury prone label on most guys is ridiculous. It's the NFL and guys get hurt, nearly all of them. My basic point is just because a guy gets a better ypc in limited carries doesn't always mean that they are the better back or deserve to be the starter. It's certainly possible that Norwood will get more as the year goes on, it'll be interesting to watch....Maybe he is a rookie coach who is more confident with a veteran rb to start the year then with a young rb. Maybe the coaching staff will start using Norwood more as he is clearly thier big play guy. My point is even though Dunn is the starter now, it's as obvious as the nose on your face that Norwood is going to get on the field more as evidenced by Petrino's latest comments. I still say that he will have a role similar to Bush this year and that he will get his chance to carry the load sometime this year. Can we at least agree that it takes more than one game before making some ridiculous comments that he is injury prone based on 99 carries!Maybe he can't pass protect...maybe he can't handle the pounding...maybe he's better getting a few carries fresh when the defense is more tired...maybe he's not smart enough to remember more than a handful of plays... I tend to lean toward the coach's who have been doing this for 20+ years and their decisions in matters like this since they see these players everyday and know what they can/can't do MUCH MUCH MUCH better than us fantasy geeks.How do we know? He hasn't has the oppertunity yet. It still baffles me people have placed the stigma on this guy that he can't carry a full load when there isn't enough stats to date to warrant this thinking.Maybe Petrieno knows that Norwood can't carry the full load.