lakerstan
Footballguy
As a liberal, this is where we lose - because what you call a despot, we might call a great President. And since conservatives typically own more guns, a hippie liberal commie pinko guy like me is screwed when the stuff hits the fan.I can see why you'd go that route, but I actually disagree with that. I think those types of weapons are too dangerous for random people to own and literally serve no purpose other than to fight a revolution or something similar. Guns still have sporting or pleasure uses that are reasonable. My rationale is that, if 'revolution' comes, guns are enough. All of those fancy things need supplies to function and are largely dispersed throughout the entire country. A despot would struggle immensely to secure all of those stockpiles and armories across an entire country during a revolution. I'd also expect that at least some of the army wouldn't want to shoot their friends and family.
I think the question is where you draw the line, because it can be blurry. When it comes down to it, a tank is just a big mobile gun.
Grenade launchers?
Automatic guns?
Semi-automatic guns?
Pistols?
Toy guns?
To date, our government has said yes to semi-automatic and no to automatic. Some believe it is too strict, others believe not strict enough. People just disagree where that line is.
Hippie liberal commie pinko guy like me also believes that if you need an automatic gun to go hunting, you may just want to go to a butcher shop because you are doing it wrong.