Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
No. The government denied it because of the anti-KKK rally that developed during a cross burning in 2016 that had only 20 or so attendees but over a hundred protesters. They claimed they did not have the resources to manage the opposition to the KKK.
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
They could use some legal advice on how to
I think characterizing the speech in question (burning a cross) as a terroristic threat under Georgia law pretty much covers it.
Do not mistake me. The denial likely should have occurred. I was only objecting to the language quoted in he article justifying the denial. It was in-artful, as you know.
You just said the homeowner was shot. What makes you think they wouldn't have shot the dogs?
100% guaranteed?
My collection started with Onyx, a gift for my oldest daughter. Then Lucky just showed up one day, and my youngest said it was hers. Then Onyx got lucky and my ex said Junior and Princess were for her. No one ever tried to steal them. I locked up Princess in the utility room whenever we left the house because I was afraid of her firepower if someone ever broke into the house.
Well, if you believe the gun thread, there was a discussion about how deadly the AR is. So, if you have four armed people in your house, wouldn't you want the most effective thing you can own to fight them off?
Probably not in this case as he was specifically targeted for his guns and marijuana.
Fewer guns and legal marijuana would make poor people rich and stop crime?
I haven't looked it up, but I bet there's far fewer violent crimes tied to marijuana in states that have legalized it. It's not about the cost, it's the deep criminal networks that exist to support illegal drug sales. My hunch is the guy with the AR15 was involved in some of those networks.
Comical post but not surprising. My guess is he unloaded on these guys, spraying everywhere. He killed with the AR-15. They didn't with their hand guns. The good guy won and you don't like it.
Maybe. But,, I think you're painting with broad strokes in regards to home invasions. Most are simple burglaries where the perp didn't know someone was home. If these guys knew this guy was home, the police should be calling it something other than a home invasion. Robbery perhaps.
The question is why anyone would need an assault rifle. Plenty of other guns could have done what he did here.
Wrong. If the homeowner would of had a revolver with 6 rounds, the homeowner would have been dead.
I'm sure a rusted up '75 Volkswagen bug will get your family around town, why do you need the vehicle you're driving?
I don't need it. I don't need new cars. Which is why my vehicle is almost 15 years old.
Him alone? No, of course not.
When the homeowner returns to his house, will he buy more assault weapons for the next burglary, or will he secure the perimeter with an alarm, barrier and dog.
I think you're confused.
One of the home invaders came to the front door with a ruse about needing help with a vehicle about an hour before the break-in. If he had heard a loud bark from a German shepherd, I doubt if the invaders would've returned. I'd prefer a shotgun and a shepherd over the AR-15 if I lived in an isolated location.
One of the intruders had a shotgun. He went up against an AR. He's dead now.
