Ok. I have already mentioned that I agree with the problem of language.I believe there is a limit to the amount of "manual building" we can do for others simply because of the most prevalent, aggravating, inscrutability problem of the human condition: the denoting problem. Russell probably described it best. Wittgenstein spent a great deal of time working on it. Everyone knows it's there intuitively. The problem is this: you don't mean what I mean when we use the same words. We have a general sense of what we mean, but "definitions" aren't definite. The manual needs to start with a dictionary.
The closer we come to meaning the same thing, the closer we come to moving the human race forward. In my opinion. And once we all know what we mean, humanity is going to move forward at a pace that makes today look like the Dark Ages. Unfortunately, as noted by the original post, we're moving in the wrong direction.
Wanted to quote this as it relates to above.I’ll tell you why a manual is most important in my opinion: because it gives a definition - a real, live, definition by a person - of what a life well lived is.
Can you imagine if we all agreed on the definition of that?
I don't think there is one definition for this. I think that is part of the problem. It might even feed into the "rage". If you are being told that X is a well lived life but that doesn't fit your lifestyle then you could end up being "forced" to live some perfect lifestyle that isn't for you adding to your "rage". Seems like a never ending battle of figuring out who is right about what a well lived life is.I’ll tell you why a manual is most important in my opinion: because it gives a definition - a real, live, definition by a person - of what a life well lived is.
Can you imagine if we all agreed on the definition of that?
No one's suggesting to force everyone into anything.I don't think there is one definition for this. I think that is part of the problem. It might even feed into the "rage". If you are being told that X is a well lived life but that doesn't fit your lifestyle then you could end up being "forced" to live some perfect lifestyle that isn't for you adding to your "rage". Seems like a never ending battle of figuring out who is right about what a well lived life is.
I think there are multiple paths to a well lived life that influence and define what a well lived life is. I don't think there is a single correct answer and trying to force everyone into one definition adds to the frustration and rage.
Forced was the wrong meaning. I basically meant if this life manual defined what a well lived life is it may not meet the definition for everyone (which is what I thought your original comment was leading to). If it isn't the same for everyone and people try and live that way because some manual said so it could lead to frustration and add to the rage.No one's suggesting to force everyone into anything.
The answer is 42, I thought this was common knowledge?I don't think there is one definition for this. I think that is part of the problem. It might even feed into the "rage". If you are being told that X is a well lived life but that doesn't fit your lifestyle then you could end up being "forced" to live some perfect lifestyle that isn't for you adding to your "rage". Seems like a never ending battle of figuring out who is right about what a well lived life is.
I think there are multiple paths to a well lived life that influence and define what a well lived life is. I don't think there is a single correct answer and trying to force everyone into one definition adds to the frustration and rage.
You should be beer 42 then.....hahahhaaThe answer is 42, I thought this was common knowledge?
Sure. Of course it's possible that's a failure of definition, rather than concept.Forced was the wrong meaning. I basically meant if this life manual defined what a well lived life is it may not meet the definition for everyone (which is what I thought your original comment was leading to). If it isn't the same for everyone and people try and live that way because some manual said so it could lead to frustration and add to the rage.
Good stuff.I don't think there is one definition for this. I think that is part of the problem. It might even feed into the "rage". If you are being told that X is a well lived life but that doesn't fit your lifestyle then you could end up being "forced" to live some perfect lifestyle that isn't for you adding to your "rage". Seems like a never ending battle of figuring out who is right about what a well lived life is.
I think there are multiple paths to a well lived life that influence and define what a well lived life is. I don't think there is a single correct answer and trying to force everyone into one definition adds to the frustration and rage.
I've always been about a dozen short of a full load so, fitting.You should be beer 42 then.....hahahhaa
White is the opposite of absence of color. It's all colors I believe.Leroy Hoard said:White is an absence of color and black is an absence of light.
I'm not sure what a black light is.
Define yield. Monetary will be similar to the emoji. Personal, as well as pushing the human race forward into a mode of thinking that is not currently accepted? I'd think those would be off the charts. If you're a greedy *******, sure, keep it to yourself. If you want to save mankind from eating itself, cry havoc and let slip the words of wikkidpissah!
One of the reasons i never started a thread like this on my own is that, whenever i call humans "typical" or "animalistic", response dries up like a billionaire's tear ducts and reminds me that i will never see substantial yield from this kind of work in my lifetime.
Many of the greats were not appreciated or fully realized until after their time had past. Referring to animals as animalistic isn't that a bit like calling water wet? Carry on...
One of the reasons i never started a thread like this on my own is that, whenever i call humans "typical" or "animalistic", response dries up like a billionaire's tear ducts and reminds me that i will never see substantial yield from this kind of work in my lifetime.
Well, it depends if you are talking light or pigments. To be honest, there is no color...just frequency/energy. Color is just a human interpretation and is relative to one's perspective.White is the opposite of absence of color. It's all colors I believe.
But my mind is melting from reading Wikkid's posts, so what the hell do I know.
Money has nothing to do with it. My only tiny selfishness is for posterity. There is a provision in my will that states "If I'm published, i'd like to be buried with a headstone so readers may get inspiration from the site as I have done with some of my idols. If not, spark me up!".Define yield. Monetary will be similar to the emoji. Personal, as well as pushing the human race forward into a mode of thinking that is not currently accepted? I'd think those would be off the charts. If you're a greedy *******, sure, keep it to yourself. If you want to save mankind from eating itself, cry havoc and let slip the words of wikkidpissah!
I wonder what your native THC content is at this point.If not, spark me up!
Never been a pot smoker. I have two speeds on weed - game-show host and serial killer. I only toke with musicians i work with, to be social, and ladies who wind the day down and tighten their libidos with puff.I wonder what your native THC content is at this point.
Is that you Pat Sajack?I have two speeds on weed - game-show host and serial killer.
Yeah. When I listed "vernacular" as a suble language distinction, I was thinking of your work.wikkidpissah said:... I am attempting to teach people what that is using vernacular of daily use.
...
I wanna clarify this.... I was thinking of your work.
...
well said, thanks for having our backKnowing how trapped y'all are makes me yearn to see you free, if only for the reduction in personal wear & tear.
A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.
One of the reasons i never started a thread like this on my own is that, whenever i call humans "typical" or "animalistic", response dries up like a billionaire's tear ducts and reminds me that i will never see substantial yield from this kind of work in my lifetime.
If you're in, keep your eye out for a post i'll be putting out in the next couple days headed THIS IS IMPORTANT. Of all the stuff that will be in this thread - from me intentionally, from others, from me responding to others - it is the part i most want everyone to understand. It's complicated, so ask me questions about it, y'all - it's a vital part of the Human Owner's Manual, but among the most difficult to explain clearly and i want to get it right when i do it f'realsies. Stay with it, my friend.
wikkidpissah said:THIS IS IMPORTANT
THIS is why you can't improvise your way through life and expect to be happy
THIS is why a billionaire living the dream can be as miserable as a Bidi girl sold into slavery by her family.
THIS is why everyone's upbringings (except those involving molestation & severe privation) are moot.
THIS is why our inner ape won't let our inner computer run the show.
THIS is why we are constantly sabotaging ourselves and why we take life, even when it doesn't affect us, personally.
...
wikkidpissah said:
...And your closet's passive functions may be even more poisonous. This is the organ of dis-ease Freud sought. Why, and how i found out about it, next time.
I really look forward to getting deeper into this.wikkidpissah said:That is what is happening when you can't let go of a slight, a moral outrage, social discomfiture or fugitive notion. Your animalistic alarm system has been moved up one or more levels of security and not informed why.
This snippet clarifies some things for me that I think I misunderstood earlier. Nice.wikkidpissah said:One doesn't feel it as rage, per se,..
I like the picture you painted here.wikkidpissah said:The reason why a child who doesn't get his impulse item at the checkout counter tears at his clothes and bugs out his eyes or whose dolly being left behind causes more grief than if the whole family had been eaten by raptors is rage over a failure at dominance.
There's a whole lot of awesomeness to digest up in there. I'm going through it for the third time...That's why i never started this thread on my own, tho i've taught or treated a couple dozen FFAppers on my program - Chief D sees the Hand of God in found pennies and song mixes and gets 25 responses in an hour, I announce & describe a foundation of personality which replaces Freud's concepts about our inner ####storm and get a joke, a f'realsies & a smilie in 24 hours. I'll post the next lesson next week but, seriously............
My experience with watching toddlers has always left me curious about their need to test boundaries. May I humbly suggest that rage may be superseded by the individual's need for CONTROL. I feel like rage may be the bi-product (energy) derived from one's lack of control in their personal environment. An 18-month old throwing Cheerios on the floor is testing her control over her environment. She may feel rage if not allowed to do this. She may develop strong rage if yelled at or spanked. She may grow up with more problematic rage than others if further attempts to control her life and environment are stifled with hostile punishments. I wonder if fixing ones rage is is akin to attacking a cold with a cough drop. So, I'm suggesting that anyone who learns to control their rage may still struggle with their inability to control their world to their satisfaction.Sigmund Freud was dead right that we all are subconsciously compelled to do things we don't understand and wouldn't consciously conceive to do.
Sigmund Freud was dead wrong that we all are subconsciously compelled to do things we don't understand and wouldn't consciously conceive to do because of sex.
wikkid say in the FFA of the USA that we all are subconsciously compelled to do things we don't understand and wouldn't consciously conceive to do because of rage.
That's right. Rage. These days are all about rage. Actually, all our days from the very beginning are about rage. And that's why nice won't win, @Joe Bryant. That's why acting decently and expecting decency and pretending everything will be alright will not abide until rage has been controlled, conquered, and ultimately defeated. That is the essential difference between how we'll be acting centuries from now and how we act now. Surprisingly, it's rather simply achieved in the individual. I'm doing this to show people how.
First, we have to understand rage and why it is such a vital and compelling part of what we are.
The first thing we have to understand is the Law of Life. The first job of any living organism, system or being is survival. Just because the human brain can conceive of the Divine Comedy, the 9th Symphony, the Theory of Relativity and Geico commercials is entirely separate from the fact that the brain's first act will always be consideration of its and its host's survival. Even though human understanding is easily the highest function in four and a half billion years of earthly progress, it is way way way way way down the list of your brain's priorities.
If i continue to post portions of my manual in this thread, you will read a lot about the dictates of survival but, for now, i want to concentrate on a single aspect. Domination. The surest way to survive is to entirely dominate one's surroundings. Therefore, it is, always has been and will be the first and strongest instinct of any animal. Domination - have it all and have it NOW. nufced
Unfortunately, anything which fuels or enhances or protects life and aids or ensures survival is something other beings are going to want, too. Pretty much every nature show you can watch involves competition for the benefits of any environment. The second instinct is to do whatever is necessary, up to and past the risk of one's life, to compete for the necessities and abiding luxuries of existence. To the death or run from death, fight or flight - the 2nd instinct of any animal.
The third instinct is a lot tricker. It is to measure risk against reward when in competition, then to respond accordingly. That is the instinct which separates primates, humans even more so, from other animals and its understanding is the essential goal of human life.
The job of human parenthood is to get offspring to the third instinct as quickly and completely as possible. The only effective way to do so is to continually and consistently frustrate the dominance and fight-to-the-death instincts of their children. The product of the frustration of dominance is rage.
til next -
This is spot on, but 99% of rage is much more insipid than that. The lion's share of our behavior is leaks or sublimations or abstractions of rage, passively discharged. Flamboyance is rage, hyperactivity is rage, gossip is rage, insomnia is rage, cheering is rage, most FFA discussion (the need to rate one's favorites over another's) is rage and, most of all, taking life personally - a phrase my students hear more than any other - is rage. One need not ever feel the actual full voice of rage to have one's entire life colored by it. As i said, if you place the word "rage" where Freud put "sex" you'd have a much clearer picture of how the modern human operates.My experience with watching toddlers has always left me curious about their need to test boundaries. May I humbly suggest that rage may be superseded by the individual's need for CONTROL. I feel like rage may be the bi-product (energy) derived from one's lack of control in their personal environment. An 18-month old throwing Cheerios on the floor is testing her control over her environment. She may feel rage if not allowed to do this. She may develop strong rage if yelled at or spanked. She may grow up with more problematic rage than others if further attempts to control her life and environment are stifled with hostile punishments. I wonder if fixing ones rage is is akin to attacking a cold with a cough drop. So, I'm suggesting that anyone who learns to control their rage may still struggle with their inability to control their world to their satisfaction.
If an individual was given literally everything that they wanted would they still have rage? I'd submit the rage comes from the inability to express desires, urges, and control as they like.
Society teaches us to keep our rage in check but the batter of control remains in the baking bowl. Example: A guy making $45k/yr at the unstable plant who buys a $60k boat may not be acting out of Rage but his inability to Control other aspects of his life. He may not have much say in his job but is sure going to have some fun. It's his way of exercising Control in his own life
I do not have a healthy baseline of love, security, and community. So, I do struggle with rage but, somehow, have it mostly in check. However, I'm still an unhealthy person because I've never been allowed/encouraged to forge a healthy sense of control. As such, in one of those who feels life happens to me than the other way around. I'd guess healthy folks do not feel this way, take fewer selfies, and generally accept limits better, capitalizing on those things they positively can control.
Admittedly, I may be using the term rage more superficial than what was intended by Wikkid.
Dominance. Submission. Conqueror. Conquest. Con. Mark. Victor. Vanquished.THIS IS IMPORTANT
THIS is why you can't improvise your way through life and expect to be happy
THIS is why a billionaire living the dream can be as miserable as a Bidi girl sold into slavery by her family.
THIS is why everyone's upbringings (except those involving molestation & severe privation) are moot.
THIS is why our inner ape won't let our inner computer run the show.
THIS is why we are constantly sabotaging ourselves and why we take life personally, even when it's none of our business.
Rage.
Yeah, wikkid, you already said that. What about it?
Well, i could go into the amygdala and hippocampus and our triune brain structure and preternatural alarm systems (as the Human Owner's Manual will), but the greatest discovery in my 20+ years work on achieving & maintaining happiness is the key to why people with good lives and fine resolve can fall apart, sink into pain and become unable to trust anything inside themselves and spend each day in fear of falling down an awful inner hole. It is why we can have a great day and be a mess by bedtime.
Due to a design flaw in our mechanism, every human being has an inaccessible pool of distilled rage under the surface. One doesn't feel it as rage, per se, but it poisons or at least colors everything we do. It is why each and every occurence can light an inner fuse. It is relatively easy to explain and, once realized, develops its own mechanism to counter it, like a new muscle from exercise.
As I said earlier, the first instinct of every organism, every person, every itty bitty baby is dominance. This is why toddlers smash Cheerios and milk on the tray of their hi-chairs without even being in an attack mode and will flat punch a smiling face that gets close enough to do so. Conquer everything - the surest step to survival and, therefore, the first.
Parents, whether they intend to or not, civilize their children by constantly frustrating every attempt at dominance until the child becomes willing and able to consider alternatives, which the parent then teaches them or doesn't.
Once again, the product of the frustration of dominance is rage. The reason why a child who doesn't get his impulse item at the checkout counter tears at his clothes and bugs out his eyes or whose dolly being left behind causes more grief than if the whole family had been eaten by raptors is rage over a failure at dominance.
There are thousands and thousands of incidents of childhood rage in every life. Too many to count and, certainly, remember.
Wrong. We remember all of them. Not the incidents, but the effects, and those memories are cumulatively and quantitatively stored in our psyches without the stories of their cause attached (mostly because they are all too reactive & silly) as tabs for later access. Unfair. Indulge me a brief explanation of the science of the phenomenon.
The human pre-frontal cortex, often metaphorically referred to as the conductor of our orchestra of thoughts and impulses, is the culmination of four and a half billion years of earthy progress, God's divine plan or both. The most poorly-functioning one is capable of more combinations than there are atoms in this solar system. It has two rapid growth periods, each of approximately 18 months' duration - the first, from ages 6 months to 2 years, so that an infant can begin to distinguish the importance of input and remember things of significance. The second phase may or may not coincide with physical puberty - the science hasn't gone far enough to establish a connection or lack of one - but usually occurs between ages 11-13, when the final growth spurt hardwires the brain into a single coordinated organ of function.
This allows a period of approximately ten years when the brain is virtually a sponge - aware enough for simple understanding, but without executive function to interfere with intake. Really an excellent blueprint for optimum development, except for one thing.
The hardwiring of the completion of the second growth spurt cuts off and seals a lot of useful function. I could go a little ways into the effects it has on dreams, memory and other mental processes but neither the science nor my understanding is evolved enough for a complete picture. The sealing keeps rote lessons and important codes of behavior available for ready access and confident use but, while this hierarchy works beautifully for our active and reactive needs, it leaves a lot of information unlabelled and only loosely stored in a forgotten closet, so to speak. Pieces can fall out, which is why we can suddenly "know" Jeopardy answers that we had no remembrance of learning (and which i have a feeling that our dreamscapes file &/or discard), but it's mostly useless, homeless junk.
Including, unfortunately, the nameless rage of every childhood frustration, right there behind the times tables, state capitals, manners, lessons, tastes. One has reasons for using all the other rememberings, so they have tabs for quick & easy recall, but everything one experiences bounces off one's entire capacity, including this dark closet of............wait for it............triggers. Any experience that bounces off a nameless memory can spark a fuse down to our lowest, animal processes. That is what is happening when you can't let go of a slight, a moral outrage, social discomfiture or fugitive notion. Your animalistic alarm system has been moved up one or more levels of urgency and not informed why.
And your closet's passive functions may be even more poisonous. This is the organ of dis-ease Freud sought. Why, and how i found out about it, next time.
That can literally explain everything that's wrong with the world and very little of what's right. We have an amazing living computer, the culmination of all earthly things, inside us but invariably let a monkey push the buttons.that closet full of rage is like a barrel full of monkeys, fighting for the the controls of a spaceship. Give them some peanuts and set the controls for true northeastwestsouth. The monkeys are entertaining, useful and oftentimes good company. But they have no business at the controls of a spaceship.
I must be quite far along in your program. this is a chapter I'd like to readIn addition, one of the things people who've had success with the program invariably note is how repulsive other people begin to appear to them once they have. I had to develop an entire chapter dedicated to dealing with that. Knowing how trapped y'all are makes me yearn to see you free, if only for the reduction in personal wear & tear.
when you start to see the entire human race like an ex whose pettiness you can't believe love once excused, it's a trip....I must be quite far along in your program. this is a chapter I'd like to read
No intent to slight. This is deep, thought provoking stuff. Need time to absorb, reflect, thinkThat's why i never started this thread on my own, tho i've taught or treated a couple dozen FFAppers on my program - Chief D sees the Hand of God in found pennies and song mixes and gets 25 responses in an hour, I announce & describe a foundation of personality which replaces Freud's concepts about our inner ####storm and get a joke, a f'realsies & a smilie in 24 hours. I'll post the next lesson next week but, seriously............
Agreed. Looking forward to the next installment.This needs to keep going.