What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WIS V All-Time Baseball Draft: HARRRRRRRIFIC (1 Viewer)

Holy crap, this thing is really starting - no way I can do this now - next week, maybe, after that I'm free for about 2 months, but not now. I thought we'd finish the stadium draft and then start players and I thought that would be a week from now. Sorry, no shtick I can't do this.
:lmao:
 
Holy crap, this thing is really starting - no way I can do this now - next week, maybe, after that I'm free for about 2 months, but not now. I thought we'd finish the stadium draft and then start players and I thought that would be a week from now. Sorry, no shtick I can't do this.
No clock or anything at this point, don't panic
 
Holy crap, this thing is really starting - no way I can do this now - next week, maybe, after that I'm free for about 2 months, but not now. I thought we'd finish the stadium draft and then start players and I thought that would be a week from now. Sorry, no shtick I can't do this.
You can't make one pick now? You won't pick again until next week easy.
 
Holy crap, this thing is really starting - no way I can do this now - next week, maybe, after that I'm free for about 2 months, but not now.  I thought we'd finish the stadium draft and then start players and I thought that would be a week from now.  Sorry, no shtick I can't do this.
You can't make one pick now? You won't pick again until next week easy.
Just take a Babe Roof and come back next Tuesday.
 
The partnership of GWB and Bogart has started off slightly rocky, but extremely steady. There was pushing for another player and then another Ruth year, but in the end, cooler heads (the one who prepared) prevailed...
Here is the transcript:Bogart: Let's take "PLAYER X" with the first pick.

GWB: No.

Bogart: Okay, let's take Babe Roof 1921.

GWB: No.

Bogart: Why don't you just tell me who you want to pick?

GWB: We're taking Babe Roof 1920

Bogart: DO IT

 
1.01 Babe Ruth

1.02 Babe Ruth

1.03 Babe Ruth

yeah, this is a ####### blast, good call on this rule, douchebags!!

edit.....i think i spelled douchebags wrong

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The partnership of GWB and Bogart has started off slightly rocky, but extremely steady. There was pushing for another player and then another Ruth year, but in the end, cooler heads (the one who prepared) prevailed...
Here is the transcript:Bogart: Let's take "PLAYER X" with the first pick.

GWB: No.

Bogart: Okay, let's take Babe Roof 1921.

GWB: No.

Bogart: Why don't you just tell me who you want to pick?

GWB: We're taking Babe Roof 1920

Bogart: DO IT
So Boggie's the catcher?
 
The partnership of GWB and Bogart has started off slightly rocky, but extremely steady. There was pushing for another player and then another Ruth year, but in the end, cooler heads (the one who prepared) prevailed...
Here is the transcript:Bogart: Let's take "PLAYER X" with the first pick.

GWB: No.

Bogart: Okay, let's take Babe Roof 1921.

GWB: No.

Bogart: Why don't you just tell me who you want to pick?

GWB: We're taking Babe Roof 1920

Bogart: DO IT
So Boggie's the catcher?
Looks that way.
 
I'll give 8-1 odds he doesn't take a Ruth.
That would've been interesting if '20 or '21 slipped to his 4th pick, but at this point you'd have to offer 250 to 1 odds before I'd consider it.
 
1.01 Babe Ruth

1.02 Babe Ruth

1.03 Babe Ruth

yeah, this is a ####### blast, good call on this rule, douchebags!!
("douchebags" looks on the money to me)As I think about it ... it's going to take a round or two for the picks to get somewhat varied and interesting. Even now, though, there are still issues like batting-versus-pitching.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
1.01 Babe Ruth

1.02 Babe Ruth

1.03 Babe Ruth

yeah, this is a ####### blast, good call on this rule, douchebags!!

edit.....i think i spelled douchebags wrong
Just think of all the great seasons that haven't been drafted?!? The possibilities are endless.
 
I'll give 8-1 odds he doesn't take a Ruth.
That would've been interesting if '20 or '21 slipped to his 4th pick, but at this point you'd have to offer 250 to 1 odds before I'd consider it.
His #1-1a pick is still there. He will take him.
No doubt. Honestly, we should probably just give him his player and move on.. we could make some progress. ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll give 8-1 odds he doesn't take a Ruth.
That would've been interesting if '20 or '21 slipped to his 4th pick, but at this point you'd have to offer 250 to 1 odds before I'd consider it.
His #1-1a pick is still there. He will take him.
No doubt. Honestly, we should probably just give him his player and move on.. we could make some progress. ;)
Who is "his player"? This could affect my trading.
 
I'll give 8-1 odds he doesn't take a Ruth.
That would've been interesting if '20 or '21 slipped to his 4th pick, but at this point you'd have to offer 250 to 1 odds before I'd consider it.
His #1-1a pick is still there. He will take him.
Yeah, I don't think there's any doubt who he'll take.
I would say there are at least 2 other arguable non pitching options available though
non-pitching? You think he's taking a pitcher?
 
I'll give 8-1 odds he doesn't take a Ruth.
That would've been interesting if '20 or '21 slipped to his 4th pick, but at this point you'd have to offer 250 to 1 odds before I'd consider it.
His #1-1a pick is still there. He will take him.
Yeah, I don't think there's any doubt who he'll take.
I would say there are at least 2 other arguable non pitching options available though
Not for the OBP lover in him.
 
I'll give 8-1 odds he doesn't take a Ruth.
That would've been interesting if '20 or '21 slipped to his 4th pick, but at this point you'd have to offer 250 to 1 odds before I'd consider it.
His #1-1a pick is still there. He will take him.
Yeah, I don't think there's any doubt who he'll take.
I would say there are at least 2 other arguable non pitching options available though
non-pitching? You think he's taking a pitcher?
No, I was just saying there are two other non pitchers possibly worth taking in addition to the guy you think, guess non pitchers wasn't really a necessary adjective there :shrug:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll give 8-1 odds he doesn't take a Ruth.
That would've been interesting if '20 or '21 slipped to his 4th pick, but at this point you'd have to offer 250 to 1 odds before I'd consider it.
His #1-1a pick is still there. He will take him.
Yeah, I don't think there's any doubt who he'll take.
I would say there are at least 2 other arguable non pitching options available though
non-pitching? You think he's taking a pitcher?
No, I was just saying there are two other non pitchers possibly worth taking in addition to the guy you think, guess non pitchers wasn't really a necessary adjective there :shrug:
Gotcha.
 
have we established whether trading is allowed yet?

if not, I'll vote again for no trading
I thought HARRRRRRRRRRRRR had said no trading during the draft, but afterwards was OK.
During the draft is the best time to trade. :angry:
I agree, as long as there are no Larry Deals
Speaking of which, I'm looking to trade down from my #8 spot. I'll entertain offers via PM.
Everyone is now willing to trade down as their players keep sliding to them.Hell, 8 picks gone and only one player gone, this is GREAT!!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top