Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
WIS V All-Time Baseball Draft: HARRRRRRRIFIC (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter RnR
- Start date
ScottNorwood
Footballcutie
Scott > Smutton
Mr. Pickles
Footballguy
all set here.
only one SP picked so far is worse (tom seaver)no, that's not true. there were one or two that weren't even on the list, but i can't remember who they were.Is he really THAT badthis is true. more picks like '66 koufax, and you'll be falling like larry in an obstacle coursePlenty of time to blow it.That's the highest Harrrrr has ever ranked me
amos rusie, that was one of them
ScottNorwood
Footballcutie
Meh, you're probably right. How is our team doing in the harr-rankings so far?03 Bondsmore HR + more BB = more runs allowed
Sutton is a beast in this sim.
42 Williams
97 Piazza
27 Hornsby
99 Walker
86 Scott
97 Clemens
looks pretty good to me. i'd want to have more arms by this point in the draft, but those are all solid picksMeh, you're probably right. How is our team doing in the harr-rankings so far?03 Bonds
Sutton is a beast in this sim.
42 Williams
97 Piazza
27 Hornsby
99 Walker
86 Scott
97 Clemens
ScottNorwood
Footballcutie
era is bogus. If he gives up unearned runs it's still going to hurt your team.you don't think he will?I'll trade you my next pick for Sutton
it seems that some of you think i would only offer a guy for trade if he sucks.
sutton should be top 10 in league era.
Sammy3469
Footballguy
You have at a minimum 2 Pedro, 2 Maddux, a W. Johnson, and 2 Koufax seasons that are way better. That's 7 and I'm not even to the deadball era guys. I guess he could slide in somewhere below that, but I'd be surprised unless you have a severe pitchers park.you don't think he will?I'll trade you my next pick for Sutton
sutton should be top 10 in league era.
that Clemens K-Rate.
I always thought clowns were nice
ScottNorwood
Footballcutie
Confused? If a guy hits the ball in play and reaches on an error and your pitcher allows him to score that's not good. Does that clarify things?
ScottNorwood
Footballcutie
Cool. Capella's been helping us with our picks.looks pretty good to me. i'd want to have more arms by this point in the draft, but those are all solid picksMeh, you're probably right. How is our team doing in the harr-rankings so far?03 Bonds
Sutton is a beast in this sim.
42 Williams
97 Piazza
27 Hornsby
99 Walker
86 Scott
97 Clemens
he knows his baseballCool. Capella's been helping us with our picks.looks pretty good to me. i'd want to have more arms by this point in the draft, but those are all solid picksMeh, you're probably right. How is our team doing in the harr-rankings so far?03 Bonds
Sutton is a beast in this sim.
42 Williams
97 Piazza
27 Hornsby
99 Walker
86 Scott
97 Clemens
ThisGuy
Ignored by Nipsey
But he can't pick a collegehe knows his baseballCool. Capella's been helping us with our picks.looks pretty good to me. i'd want to have more arms by this point in the draft, but those are all solid picksMeh, you're probably right. How is our team doing in the harr-rankings so far?03 Bonds
Sutton is a beast in this sim.
42 Williams
97 Piazza
27 Hornsby
99 Walker
86 Scott
97 Clemens
Kraft...
Footballguy
But the boy can sing like an AngelBut he can't pick a collegehe knows his baseballCool. Capella's been helping us with our picks.looks pretty good to me. i'd want to have more arms by this point in the draft, but those are all solid picksMeh, you're probably right. How is our team doing in the harr-rankings so far?03 Bonds
Sutton is a beast in this sim.
42 Williams
97 Piazza
27 Hornsby
99 Walker
86 Scott
97 Clemens
Last edited by a moderator:
Sammy3469
Footballguy
63 is basically the same across the board except Koufax strikes more people out (which matters). 64 is basically the same statistical makeup as Suttons with a few more HRs, but more Ks.63 won't sim better than sutton.and 64 is worse than most pitchers picked thus far.65 and 63 down? and I could easily make an argument his 64 season is also better than Suttons 72.
I really don't see why you don't like those 2 years.
Doctor Detroit
Please remove your headgear
ScottNorwood
Footballcutie
I'm pretty confident that about 95% of the pitchers are going to suck in this SIM. The lineups are just too good.63 is basically the same across the board except Koufax strikes more people out (which matters). 64 is basically the same statistical makeup as Suttons with a few more HRs, but more Ks.63 won't sim better than sutton.and 64 is worse than most pitchers picked thus far.65 and 63 down? and I could easily make an argument his 64 season is also better than Suttons 72.
I really don't see why you don't like those 2 years.
Sammy3469
Footballguy
me too...I think there will be a lot of 8-6 games.I'm pretty confident that about 95% of the pitchers are going to suck in this SIM. The lineups are just too good.63 is basically the same across the board except Koufax strikes more people out (which matters). 64 is basically the same statistical makeup as Suttons with a few more HRs, but more Ks.63 won't sim better than sutton.and 64 is worse than most pitchers picked thus far.65 and 63 down? and I could easily make an argument his 64 season is also better than Suttons 72.
I really don't see why you don't like those 2 years.
UlyssesNorris
Faulknerian Idiot Man-Child.
Looking at a few things.
Pick on its way in a few moments.
Pick on its way in a few moments.
i like 63 a lot. i have it two slots below sutton's 72.63 is basically the same across the board except Koufax strikes more people out (which matters). 64 is basically the same statistical makeup as Suttons with a few more HRs, but more Ks.63 won't sim better than sutton.and 64 is worse than most pitchers picked thus far.65 and 63 down? and I could easily make an argument his 64 season is also better than Suttons 72.
I really don't see why you don't like those 2 years.
There is nothing worse than sitting in a thread for an hour WHILE YOU ARE ON THE CLOCK and then posting you have a pick coming. That is not shtick, that is signing your death warrant, rookie. i'm happy to have drafted 4 pitchers from that 5%I'm pretty confident that about 95% of the pitchers are going to suck in this SIM. The lineups are just too good.63 is basically the same across the board except Koufax strikes more people out (which matters). 64 is basically the same statistical makeup as Suttons with a few more HRs, but more Ks.63 won't sim better than sutton.and 64 is worse than most pitchers picked thus far.65 and 63 down? and I could easily make an argument his 64 season is also better than Suttons 72.
I really don't see why you don't like those 2 years.
Notorious T.R.E.
Showdown!™ Administrator
Morning, Gents.
Tremendous Upside
Footballguy
How you doing this morning ace?Morning, Gents.
UlyssesNorris
Faulknerian Idiot Man-Child.
This may be a Major Reach:
Dwight Gooden, 1985
Dwight Gooden, 1985
ScottNorwood
Footballcutie
How confident can you be of that? Isn't there a (dean) chance they might flop?i'm happy to have drafted 4 pitchers from that 5%I'm pretty confident that about 95% of the pitchers are going to suck in this SIM. The lineups are just too good.63 is basically the same across the board except Koufax strikes more people out (which matters). 64 is basically the same statistical makeup as Suttons with a few more HRs, but more Ks.63 won't sim better than sutton.and 64 is worse than most pitchers picked thus far.65 and 63 down? and I could easily make an argument his 64 season is also better than Suttons 72.
I really don't see why you don't like those 2 years.
Last edited by a moderator:
