What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WIS V All-Time Baseball Draft: HARRRRRRRIFIC (2 Viewers)

back to baseball

GWB> :bye:

An industrial-sized broom for my industrialized sweep

magnetic-broom-2.jpg


 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
YES!!! Dying to talk CF now that I've started studying. I'll send you mine if a few minutes.
I kind of wish this had started today. :( Maybe it's just me, but proven talent this year seems a little thin.
 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
YES!!! Dying to talk CF now that I've started studying. I'll send you mine if a few minutes.
I kind of wish this had started today. :( Maybe it's just me, but proven talent this year seems a little thin.
Me too. Certainly seems like there's less 'star' talent.

 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
YES!!! Dying to talk CF now that I've started studying. I'll send you mine if a few minutes.
I kind of wish this had started today. :( Maybe it's just me, but proven talent this year seems a little thin.
It definitely seems that way...Seems like there are a lot fewer rock solid skill position guys to fill in the middle rounds...

Guys like the Mike Bells of the world...

 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
YES!!! Dying to talk CF now that I've started studying. I'll send you mine if a few minutes.
I kind of wish this had started today. :( Maybe it's just me, but proven talent this year seems a little thin.
I don't see why you couldn't pick. Unless you're just waiting for the call on the TE...
 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
YES!!! Dying to talk CF now that I've started studying. I'll send you mine if a few minutes.
I kind of wish this had started today. :( Maybe it's just me, but proven talent this year seems a little thin.
I don't see why you couldn't pick. Unless you're just waiting for the call on the TE...
:mellow:
 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
YES!!! Dying to talk CF now that I've started studying. I'll send you mine if a few minutes.
I kind of wish this had started today. :( Maybe it's just me, but proven talent this year seems a little thin.
I don't see why you couldn't pick. Unless you're just waiting for the call on the TE...
:mellow:
Well even if he did, I am definitely not ready to draft right now, need the extra week to finish projections and research...
 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
YES!!! Dying to talk CF now that I've started studying. I'll send you mine if a few minutes.
I kind of wish this had started today. :( Maybe it's just me, but proven talent this year seems a little thin.
I don't see why you couldn't pick. Unless you're just waiting for the call on the TE...
:mellow:
Well even if he did, I am definitely not ready to draft right now, need the extra week to finish projections and research...
:bs:
 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
YES!!! Dying to talk CF now that I've started studying. I'll send you mine if a few minutes.
I kind of wish this had started today. :( Maybe it's just me, but proven talent this year seems a little thin.
I don't see why you couldn't pick. Unless you're just waiting for the call on the TE...
:mellow:
Well even if he did, I am definitely not ready to draft right now, need the extra week to finish projections and research...
You just need to figure out your top 2. :thumbup:
 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
YES!!! Dying to talk CF now that I've started studying. I'll send you mine if a few minutes.
I kind of wish this had started today. :( Maybe it's just me, but proven talent this year seems a little thin.
I don't see why you couldn't pick. Unless you're just waiting for the call on the TE...
:mellow:
Well even if he did, I am definitely not ready to draft right now, need the extra week to finish projections and research...
You just need to figure out your top 2. :thumbup:
Right, but I need to get though all 119 teams before I can be sure of who my top 2 is...
 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
YES!!! Dying to talk CF now that I've started studying. I'll send you mine if a few minutes.
I kind of wish this had started today. :( Maybe it's just me, but proven talent this year seems a little thin.
I don't see why you couldn't pick. Unless you're just waiting for the call on the TE...
:mellow:
Well even if he did, I am definitely not ready to draft right now, need the extra week to finish projections and research...
You just need to figure out your top 2. :thumbup:
Right, but I need to get though all 119 teams before I can be sure of who my top 2 is...
:lmao:
 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
YES!!! Dying to talk CF now that I've started studying. I'll send you mine if a few minutes.
I kind of wish this had started today. :( Maybe it's just me, but proven talent this year seems a little thin.
I don't see why you couldn't pick. Unless you're just waiting for the call on the TE...
:mellow:
Well even if he did, I am definitely not ready to draft right now, need the extra week to finish projections and research...
You just need to figure out your top 2. :thumbup:
Right, but I need to get though all 119 teams before I can be sure of who my top 2 is...
I'll save you some time and tell you Duke has no one that will be taken in the top 2, much less the top 200.
 
Funk and I had the exact same players in the top 6, only differing by 1 spot here and there.

:hifive:
PM that list your unlucky #8 drafter. I'm interested in whatcha got. Will answer yours.
 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
Fourthed. Any objections should speak now.
That's fine...COuld we hae a rehash of the scoring overall?
PASSING: .05 pt per yard; TD = 6 pts; 1 int= -2 ptRUSHING: .10 pt per yard; TD = 6 pts

RECEIVING: .10 pt per yard; TD= 6 pts

TIGHT ENDS: 1 pt per reception

KICKING: Extra Point= 1 pt; 17-39 yd FG= 3 pt, 40-49 yd FG= 4 pt; 50-59 yd FG= 5 pt; 60+ yd FG= 6 pt

DEFENSE: Each team starts with 30 PTS, -1 PT for every PT scored against the team. (Ex. Penn St allows 17 pts..... 30-17 = 13 fantasy points) ; Turnover = 3 pts, Sack= 2 pts, Touchdown= 6 pts

SPECIAL TEAMS: Touchdown= 6 pts

That's what the front page reads.

 
Funk and I had the exact same players in the top 6, only differing by 1 spot here and there.

:hifive:
PM that list your unlucky #8 drafter. I'm interested in whatcha got. Will answer yours.
Sent. :banned:
:popcorn: Let's see what RnR says.

The Wife just took a new job at a huge raise. :thumbup:

But isn't starting until September. August finances could get a little tight. :thumbdown:

 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
Fourthed. Any objections should speak now.
That's fine...COuld we hae a rehash of the scoring overall?
PASSING: .05 pt per yard; TD = 6 pts; 1 int= -2 ptRUSHING: .10 pt per yard; TD = 6 pts

RECEIVING: .10 pt per yard; TD= 6 pts

TIGHT ENDS: 1 pt per reception

KICKING: Extra Point= 1 pt; 17-39 yd FG= 3 pt, 40-49 yd FG= 4 pt; 50-59 yd FG= 5 pt; 60+ yd FG= 6 pt

DEFENSE: Each team starts with 30 PTS, -1 PT for every PT scored against the team. (Ex. Penn St allows 17 pts..... 30-17 = 13 fantasy points) ; Turnover = 3 pts, Sack= 2 pts, Touchdown= 6 pts

SPECIAL TEAMS: Touchdown= 6 pts

That's what the front page reads.
Didn't know that was up there...Thanks...

 
I'd rather not make TE's required. Just give them 1 pt per reception like Aaron suggested.
Thirded.Funk - want to exchange projected top 7 picks via PM?
Fourthed. Any objections should speak now.
That's fine...COuld we hae a rehash of the scoring overall?
PASSING: .05 pt per yard; TD = 6 pts; 1 int= -2 ptRUSHING: .10 pt per yard; TD = 6 pts

RECEIVING: .10 pt per yard; TD= 6 pts

TIGHT ENDS: 1 pt per reception

KICKING: Extra Point= 1 pt; 17-39 yd FG= 3 pt, 40-49 yd FG= 4 pt; 50-59 yd FG= 5 pt; 60+ yd FG= 6 pt

DEFENSE: Each team starts with 30 PTS, -1 PT for every PT scored against the team. (Ex. Penn St allows 17 pts..... 30-17 = 13 fantasy points) ; Turnover = 3 pts, Sack= 2 pts, Touchdown= 6 pts

SPECIAL TEAMS: Touchdown= 6 pts

That's what the front page reads.
Didn't know that was up there...Thanks...
I was afraid of that. That's why we need our own thread of some sort, utter chaos. :excited:
 
Let's see what RnR says.
I agree on the contents of the top 7 that TRE sent, not necessarily the order. I do agree there is a drop off out there after #7, and I'm the one that could fall victim to it at the #8 pick. Ugh. :cry:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The vote on TE pt/rec seems to be a runaway, so unless I hear any strong opposition within the next few hours, we'll go ahead and make that a rule this season.

Next up... 50 vs. 100 entry fee.

Vote either 50, 100, or don't care either way.

Kraft is out of town and already said he didn't care either way, so I guess he starts off the voting on this one.

 
The vote on TE pt/rec seems to be a runaway, so unless I hear any strong opposition within the next few hours, we'll go ahead and make that a rule this season.

Next up... 50 vs. 100 entry fee.

Vote either 50, 100, or don't care either way.

Kraft is out of town and already said he didn't care either way, so I guess he starts off the voting on this one.
I'll take $100, but either is alright.I'm willing to get into this discussion about top picks if anyone is interested in sending a PM my way.

 
I'll vote 100.

Making the vote...

50 (2): Funk, Tre

100 (2): jag, RnR

either (1): kraft

This one may go down to the wire.

 
While all of you are here, let's collectively look at the schedule and make sure there aren't any conflicting games from the MAC or something this year. Last year we had some trouble with Toledo playing on a Thursday and then a Wednesday, putting two games in one scoring week.

 
While all of you are here, let's collectively look at the schedule and make sure there aren't any conflicting games from the MAC or something this year. Last year we had some trouble with Toledo playing on a Thursday and then a Wednesday, putting two games in one scoring week.
I'll take a look this afternoon sometime. Was our week Thursday-Wednesday? How about the December 2nd games? Are we going to go with the same approach as last year and combine the last two weeks?
 
Are we going to go with the same approach as last year and combine the last two weeks?
Gotta be honest, that worked out, but it was kinda shady the way everyone was picking up players from the teams that had 2 games in 2 weeks. The players from Colorado, La Tech, etc were flying off the waiver wire. Is there any way we can do this more effectively this year?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are we going to go with the same approach as last year and combine the last two weeks?
Gotta be honest, that worked out, but it was kinda shady the way everyone was picking up players from the teams that had 2 games in 2 weeks. The players from Colorado, La Tech, etc were flying off the waiver wire. Is there any way we can do this more effectively this year?
How did we use the lineups? I think it's fine if a player gets credit for two games during the combined week as long as that player fills up two starting spots. A lot of scrubs will probably get picked up late, but I don't see a huge advantage if starting a player twice means that you give up two of the starting spots. The one thing I don't want to see is that someone gets screwed because their stud plays twice during the final two weeks and they only get to use one of them.
 
How about this as a roster solution:

You get 12 games at every position...period...

So with 4 Qbs, you'd get 48 QB games...

6 RB, you'd get 72 RB games, etc...

It's up to the individual owner to decide when to use them (with the most you can use in any week being 4 for QBs, 6 for RBs, etc...)

 
How about this as a roster solution:

You get 12 games at every position...period...

So with 4 Qbs, you'd get 48 QB games...

6 RB, you'd get 72 RB games, etc...

It's up to the individual owner to decide when to use them (with the most you can use in any week being 4 for QBs, 6 for RBs, etc...)
I don't think the software has the capabilities to handle this, and it would be a nightmare to track manually.
 
How about this as a roster solution:

You get 12 games at every position...period...

So with 4 Qbs, you'd get 48 QB games...

6 RB, you'd get 72 RB games, etc...

It's up to the individual owner to decide when to use them (with the most you can use in any week being 4 for QBs, 6 for RBs, etc...)
I don't think the software has the capabilities to handle this, and it would be a nightmare to track manually.
Good idea though. I'm bored out of my mind here at work, someone send me some rankings. :yawn:

 
How about this as a roster solution:

You get 12 games at every position...period...

So with 4 Qbs, you'd get 48 QB games...

6 RB, you'd get 72 RB games, etc...

It's up to the individual owner to decide when to use them (with the most you can use in any week being 4 for QBs, 6 for RBs, etc...)
I don't think the software has the capabilities to handle this, and it would be a nightmare to track manually.
Good idea though.
Yeah, solid idea TU.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top