The Jets have an above average defense, above average special teams, and a below average offense. Teams with less than five wins that changed coaches
improved 29 out of 31 times since 1990. The Jets were one of the best teams in the league in 2004, and one of the worst in 2005 -- it's hard to make the claim that the Jets were "worse" than the average team with less than five wins. I'd imagine the Jets were a good deal better, since they were a very good team devastated by injuries. I don't know why you'd say they're at most going to win just one more game this year.
Mangini has one year of coordinator experience and is very young, so I expect he'll experience some growing pains before he enjoys success. The Jets also changed both offensive and defensive coordinators and their personnel on defense is not a great fit for the hybrid that Mangini wants to implement. They also traded away their best pass rusher and lost their best CB. Their QB and RB positions are uncertain without much reason for optimism. The offensive line has been almost completely rebuilt and will rely heavily on two rookies. They don't have a NT and are weak at OLB in a 3-4.
Here are four of the youngest guys ever hired to be coaches, and how they did their first year. Sure it sounds like he might experience growing pains because he's young, but I'm not sure the stats bear it out. Herm Edwards was supposed to have significant growing pains because he had never even been a coordinator before, but his first year with the Jets was tied for the best year out of five.
Head Coach Age First year's recordBill Cowher 35 11-5 Jon Gruden 35 8-8John Madden 29 12-1-1Don Shula 33 8-6Changing coordinators on both sides of the ball is neither good nor bad in a vacuum. I think the Jets OC and DC are just fine, although I do think they lost two pretty good ones.The rest of your comments are valid, but you forget what you're comparing them to. Sure the Jets OL is young, and there's no doubt that the Jets QB and RB are shaky. But last year, the Jets OL was horrible and the Jets QB and RB were pathetic. There's certainly reason for optimism that all three positions will be better in 2006.
A healthy Martin, Blaylock and Cedric Houston sounds better than a banged up Martin, injured Blaylock and rookie Houston.
A healthy Pennington, Ramsey, Clemens and Bollinger sounds a lot better than a banged up Pennington, an over the hill Testaverde, and a green Bollinger.
A young OL with the two best prospects in the draft and improvements at LG and RT sounds a lot better than the slop the Jets lined up with in 2005.
I agree with you about the personnel for the Jets 3-4, but we don't really know how often the Jets will play that. Surely Mangini will abandon it if he thinks the personnel doesn't suit the scheme. I don't think D-Rob is a great NT, but I do think Bryan Thomas would be a very good OLB. Losing Abraham hurts for sure, as does losing Ty Law. But the additions of a healthy Barton, Andre Dyson, and more seasoning out of Justin Miller and the three safeties should help balance that out.
The Jets don't have a
great defense, but they were one of the best in the league in 2004. In 2005, the defense was on the field all the time but more than held its own. It's hard to judge a defense when the opponents run 554 times against you (most in the league), despite having an above average yards per carry against. The offense was horrible last year and the defense was spotty because of that (some games it didn't show up like against Denver). But overall, the defense has been very good the last few years, and I think it should be above average again in 2006.
Winning 6 games really isn't difficult in today's NFL, and they should certainly challenge for .500.