Wonderlic Results (1 Viewer)

[Holland Freeze]

This may have been covered already closer to the combine but where have people found the results of the Wonderlic test?

 

[JPeso]

This site has all but 2008.

http://www.unc.edu/~mirabile/Wonderlic.htm

Many 2008 guys listed here.

http://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/index...p;thread=282592

 

[KellysHeroes]

This site has all but 2008.

http://www.unc.edu/~mirabile/Wonderlic.htm

Many 2008 guys listed here.

http://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/index...p;thread=282592

this is very interesting

 

[JPeso]

Sample test here is interesting. Follow directions carefully.

http://www.sportsline.com/spin/story/10014830

 

[KellysHeroes]

McNabb w/ a 14...

McNair w/ a 15

Vinyy Test w/ a 17

Cunningham w/ a 15

Marino w/ a 15

Terry Bradshaw w/ a 15

Jim Kelly w/ a 15

Jeff Goerge w/ a 10

Garrarg w/ a 14

 

[ArlingtonTerp]

The data for the 2008 numbers in that link is messed up. It's in the form X/Y in most of them, but some have a single number, and a few are X/Y/Z. The poster says it is from different tests. It makes sense actually that most of the multiple scores are actually single tests with number correct/number answered. That is the only way to explain many of the scores. There has only been one guy to ever get a 50, but there are multiple guys with 50s there, so it is obviously not their score. 17/50 would be completely impossible if it were two scores, and it would have been pretty big news if anyone got a 50 or close to it, and a scandal if a guy went from 17 to 50.

From Wikipedia, here are average scores from other professions:

* Chemist - 31

* Programmer - 29

* Journalist - 26

* Sales - 24

* Bank teller - 22

* Clerical worker - 21

* Security guard - 17

* Warehouse - 15

 

[bcr8f]

http://potencial.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/...nderlic-scores/

 

[ArlingtonTerp]

http://potencial.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/...nderlic-scores/

That looks like the same list with the same problems. Obviously, they can't be individual scores. They look like number correct/number answered for the most part, but there are some single scores, and some in the form X/Y/Z. The posters don't really know the source.

 

[KellysHeroes]

The data for the 2008 numbers in that link is messed up. It's in the form X/Y in most of them, but some have a single number, and a few are X/Y/Z. The poster says it is from different tests. It makes sense actually that most of the multiple scores are actually single tests with number correct/number answered. That is the only way to explain many of the scores. There has only been one guy to ever get a 50, but there are multiple guys with 50s there, so it is obviously not their score. 17/50 would be completely impossible if it were two scores, and it would have been pretty big news if anyone got a 50 or close to it, and a scandal if a guy went from 17 to 50.

From Wikipedia, here are average scores from other professions:

* Chemist - 31

* Programmer - 29

* Journalist - 26

* Sales - 24

* Bank teller - 22

* Clerical worker - 21

* Security guard - 17

* Warehouse - 15

Nice