Frye is more the fault of ####ty play calling. When your down by 20 in the 2nd and you run on 3rd and 8 you can't win.Tough call between Collins and Frye.
Probably something to do with 17-45 overallWhy in the world is David Carr on this list?Because he's 0-2?
hard to pick on a guy who, although bad, hasn't been on the job more than 2 weeks.if you have seen 1 offensive series of any of the titans games, you would pick COLLINS.... i'd rather have jeff george here!!!!
No way Brooks should be 2:1 over Collins.Kerry Collins is ####### TRASH.
Which is why I dont understand the Titans not letting Volek get the gig. He did well in the past, give him a shot. It's not like Collins is going to win a game for them...if you have seen 1 offensive series of any of the titans games, you would pick COLLINS.... i'd rather have jeff george here!!!!
Because...Nah...forget it.Why in the world is David Carr on this list?Because he's 0-2?
The Browns need a new O.C. Of Frye's int's this year, one was off Edwards hands, and one was off Droughns hands. Both passes were on target, chest high. Last year I remember 1 int that was off Edwards hands.lol @ Frye being on here. he's got what, 7 starts?
This tells me more about just how bad VY is..Collins is the easy choice for me.Great move by the Titans to give this guy a week before you name him the starter.![]()
I really don't think anyone knows how good or bad VY is at this time.This tells me more about just how bad VY is..Collins is the easy choice for me.Great move by the Titans to give this guy a week before you name him the starter.![]()
I really don't think anyone knows how good or bad VY is at this time.This tells me more about just how bad VY is..Collins is the easy choice for me.Great move by the Titans to give this guy a week before you name him the starter.![]()
The Titans brass are just looking more silly with each passing week.No way Brooks should be 2:1 over Collins.Kerry Collins is ####### TRASH.He got my vote. I remember looking @ the in-game stats on nfl.com and seeing him 1-8 for "0" yards to start the game. Volek must have really pizd someone off in the front office for them to deal w/ that.
Brunell gets my vote too. He has enough assets on the offense to produce, but doesn't. He also has minimal physical ability. At least some of the other guys can make all the throws if needed.You could really narrow this down to:Brooks, Brunell, Simms, PlummerI vote for Brunell![]()
Probably something to do with 17-45 overallWhy in the world is David Carr on this list?Because he's 0-2?
So being #2 in the league in passer rating after playing two good defenses means nothing at this point?Had to go with carr. He is a total loser and will NEVER take the Texans to the playoffs....EVER.Most of the rest have accomplished something other than JP Loserman but he is looking better than last year. Carr NEVER improves. Garbage time this week allowed him to pad his stats.
Well in my case with Frye I felt I should say something because, well, who besides me here actually watches Browns games lol?For the record, I wasn't singling out any certain players with the list of QBs in the poll...I just picked names that were either involved in some sort of QB controversy in late preseason/recent news stories, are averaging less than 1 TD/game, making multiple turnovers, or have some history of poor performance.
Brooks looked decent week 1 but his line was horrible. People hate him for mistakes in New Orleans, but that isn't fair. Brunnel and the whole Skins O looks bad now but will rebound.I voted Losman.
I do. I think my eyes may bleed next week though.Well in my case with Frye I felt I should say something because, well, who besides me here actually watches Browns games lol?
If you watched him Sunday you would realize he doesn't belong on this list. Even if he's not as good as he once was he's still better than the fodder on this list.Metux said:Brett Farve should be on this list. He thru 29 Int's last year. He just not as good as he once was. I love the guy and am a big fan, that why it hurts to watch him go down with the ship.
I will let his coach tell you what it means.Probably something to do with 17-45 overallWhy in the world is David Carr on this list?
Because he's 0-2?So being #2 in the league in passer rating after playing two good defenses means nothing at this point?Had to go with carr. He is a total loser and will NEVER take the Texans to the playoffs....EVER.
Most of the rest have accomplished something other than JP Loserman but he is looking better than last year. Carr NEVER improves. Garbage time this week allowed him to pad his stats.
http://www.houstontexans.com/news/detail.p...20Latest%20News(on why he believes QB David Carr does not deserve blame) “We’re all to blame. When we don’t win, we all lose, as a group, coaches and players. Good things happen when we win as a team and it’ll always be that way. David sets his performance, in the past two weeks his numbers are very, very good. You guys can tell by looking at the quarterback ratings and those type of things, but we’re not after numbers. We’re after figuring out a way to win. That’s the way I coach David, and David knows that. He’s got to be a consistent player. He played unbelievable the fourth quarter yesterday, but he’s got to play well in those first three for our football team to have a chance; he’s got to be a four-quarter player. I’ll keep coaching him to become that, but he is getting better as a player. but just getting better sometimes isn’t good enough. You’ve got to take big steps. We’re after him to take big steps and plan on him doing that.”
I think he'd do like Brooks did last weekend- 2 snaps, 2 fumbles, and taken out for an injury.Brunell should really win this, imagine him playing behing Oakland's O-Line