Hostages in IranMoscow OlympicsEconomyAmy CarterLotsa reasons.I voted Carter just for the Panama Canal debacle.
Blasphemy.it was close. both nixon and reagan are worthy of contempt. however, our current president is really staking his claim for being the "worst" of the last 50 years.
total blasphemy! Why do you hate America?it was close. both nixon and reagan are worthy of contempt. however, our current president is really staking his claim for being the "worst" of the last 50 years.
Another blasphemer!I want to say Reagan or Nixon, but in reality, it's GWB.
I want to say Reagan or Nixon, but in reality, it's GWB.
:last50yearsdown?:TannerBoyle said:No Warren G Harding option? What a crappy poll.
Nixon at least had a few positives one could list. The entire Carter presidency was a symphony of failures.Good to see Big **** Nixon getting a pass nowadays.
Or exclude Bush, limiting the pole to former Presidents.Carter should be the answer here but too many Bush haters on this board. Take this poll in about 10 years for better results.
Fool do not talk which you know nothingJFK, for almost destoying the world during the Cuban Missle Crisis.
Carter blew foreign realtions and the economy. At least the economy is doing fairly well under Bush.Carter has to be the answer here. Nobody remembers the Arab oil boycott, gas lines, the hostage taking, inflatio, price controls, more inflatio, etc. The entire presidency was an unmitigated disaster that makes Bush look like a genius in comparison.Nixon at least had a few positives one could list. The entire Carter presidency was a symphony of failures.Good to see Big **** Nixon getting a pass nowadays.
No. Carter tried a rescue and blew it.Can someone smarter and older than me elaborate on why Carter is considered such a miserable failure? Please include specifics if you don't mind.I've heard that he wasn't the "tough" guy on some issues, but was he a total failure?I've heard that Carter did most of the negotiating for the hostage release, only to have Reagan steal his thunder after the election - is this not the case?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misery_index_%28economics%29Can someone smarter and older than me elaborate on why Carter is considered such a miserable failure? Please include specifics if you don't mind.
I've heard that he wasn't the "tough" guy on some issues, but was he a total failure?
I've heard that Carter did most of the negotiating for the hostage release, only to have Reagan steal his thunder after the election - is this not the case?
remind me of what made reagan great again? he restored our faith in america and was a good president! iran-contra anyone? he won the cold war! gorbachev had everything to do with glasnost, while reagan was engaged in his "star wars" boondoggle. he was a good man? he was asleep at the wheel during the AIDS crisis, if you'll recall. the economy? certainly, streamling gov't was a good thing but volker's policies at the fed kept inflation down. reagan kept everything but military spending under wraps. as a result, we went from a creditor nation to the world's largest debtor nation. hmmm. looking at the man's record again, i might have to change my vote.Blasphemy.it was close. both nixon and reagan are worthy of contempt. however, our current president is really staking his claim for being the "worst" of the last 50 years.
I think you are speaking of Clinton here?Oh oh oh wait....INflatio. Never mind, my bad.Carter blew foreign realtions and the economy. At least the economy is doing fairly well under Bush.Carter has to be the answer here. Nobody remembers the Arab oil boycott, gas lines, the hostage taking, inflatio, price controls, more inflatio, etc. The entire presidency was an unmitigated disaster that makes Bush look like a genius in comparison.Nixon at least had a few positives one could list. The entire Carter presidency was a symphony of failures.Good to see Big **** Nixon getting a pass nowadays.
Back then we weren't as used to crooked repubs, now we are.Good to see Big **** Nixon getting a pass nowadays.
Double digit inflationgas rationingtop marginal tax rates of 70%...that's a startCan someone smarter and older than me elaborate on why Carter is considered such a miserable failure? Please include specifics if you don't mind.I've heard that he wasn't the "tough" guy on some issues, but was he a total failure?I've heard that Carter did most of the negotiating for the hostage release, only to have Reagan steal his thunder after the election - is this not the case?
the economy has nothing to do with the President.Where do people get this idea?Carter's failures are not even close to the magnitude of GW's.This should be GW in a landslide...worst president of the modern era, and judging by the last election all of America knows it...except of course for the South, which lives in its own little world.Carter blew foreign realtions and the economy. At least the economy is doing fairly well under Bush.
Every silver lining has a cloud with you doesn't it?Iran-contra was insignificant compared to his restoring faith in America.remind me of what made reagan great again? he restored our faith in america and was a good president! iran-contra anyone? he won the cold war! gorbachev had everything to do with glasnost, while reagan was engaged in his "star wars" boondoggle. he was a good man? he was asleep at the wheel during the AIDS crisis, if you'll recall. the economy? certainly, streamling gov't was a good thing but volker's policies at the fed kept inflation down. reagan kept everything but military spending under wraps. as a result, we went from a creditor nation to the world's largest debtor nation. hmmm. looking at the man's record again, i might have to change my vote.Blasphemy.it was close. both nixon and reagan are worthy of contempt. however, our current president is really staking his claim for being the "worst" of the last 50 years.
Hey, at least he had better taste in women than Clinton.And JFK was in with the mob, not to mention he was shagging Maralyn Monroe while raising a family.
Good posting. GWB by 14 lengths. Reagan beats Nixon by a nose for Place.I want to say Reagan or Nixon, but in reality, it's GWB.
Bush and Carter are probably on fairly even ground as far as foreign policy goes, but Carter blows GWB away when it comes to domestic policy, and that's saying a lot, because GWB's domestic policy sucks.the economy has nothing to do with the President.Where do people get this idea?Carter blew foreign realtions and the economy. At least the economy is doing fairly well under Bush.
Carter's failures are not even close to the magnitude of GW's.
This should be GW in a landslide...worst president of the modern era, and judging by the last election all of America knows it...except of course for the South, which lives in its own little world.
The economy has everything to do with disposable income, which has everything to do with tax cuts. The last election is pretty much meaningless, as it was as much a vote against incumbents in Congress as it was against the war. And the seats lost were fewer than a typical election in the sixth year of a presidency.Bush has slipped significantly down the list, even IMO, but Carter is still more deserbing of the bottom rung. LBJ would probably be next on my list.the economy has nothing to do with the President.Where do people get this idea?Carter's failures are not even close to the magnitude of GW's.This should be GW in a landslide...worst president of the modern era, and judging by the last election all of America knows it...except of course for the South, which lives in its own little world.Carter blew foreign realtions and the economy. At least the economy is doing fairly well under Bush.
Usually I like to correct revisionists of Reagan's record, but I think I'll let this one go. It speaks for itself.remind me of what made reagan great again? he restored our faith in america and was a good president! iran-contra anyone? he won the cold war! gorbachev had everything to do with glasnost, while reagan was engaged in his "star wars" boondoggle. he was a good man? he was asleep at the wheel during the AIDS crisis, if you'll recall. the economy? certainly, streamling gov't was a good thing but volker's policies at the fed kept inflation down. reagan kept everything but military spending under wraps. as a result, we went from a creditor nation to the world's largest debtor nation. hmmm. looking at the man's record again, i might have to change my vote.Blasphemy.it was close. both nixon and reagan are worthy of contempt. however, our current president is really staking his claim for being the "worst" of the last 50 years.
Carter should be the answer here but too many Bush haters on this board. Take this poll in about 10 years for better results.
disposable income is only a very small piece of the pie in a global economy...I love it when presidents try to take credit for the economy. Bush didn't effect the economy nor did Clinton.The economy has everything to do with disposable income, which has everything to do with tax cuts.
The last election is pretty much meaningless, as it was as much a vote against incumbents in Congress as it was against the war. And the seats lost were fewer than a typical election in the sixth year of a presidency.
This might have some validity. Isn't the worst president always the current one?Or exclude Bush, limiting the pole to former Presidents.
X Clinton left the office as one of the most popular non-war time Presidents in the history of the United States.This might have some validity. Isn't the worst president always the current one?Or exclude Bush, limiting the pole to former Presidents.
Exactly...just wait till we see what become of the Middle East.Not good.This poll will be even more lopsided in ten years' time. W in a landslide.
If I voted against a Republican incumbent it would have been because of domestic issues. Fortunately, I got to vote against a democratic incumbent (Cantwell). Unfortunately, she won.You see to forget that Congress' approval ratings were lower than the President's.But keep drinking the MSM koolaid. I know you like it!disposable income is only a very small piece of the pie in a global economy...I love it when presidents try to take credit for the economy. Bush didn't effect the economy nor did Clinton.The economy has everything to do with disposable income, which has everything to do with tax cuts.The last election is pretty much meaningless, as it was as much a vote against incumbents in Congress as it was against the war. And the seats lost were fewer than a typical election in the sixth year of a presidency.Almost everybody agrees it was a referendum on the war. Only far righties comically attempt this spin.
Yeah, nothing like a military failure to hurt the legacy of a Prez.No. Carter tried a rescue and blew it.Can someone smarter and older than me elaborate on why Carter is considered such a miserable failure? Please include specifics if you don't mind.I've heard that he wasn't the "tough" guy on some issues, but was he a total failure?I've heard that Carter did most of the negotiating for the hostage release, only to have Reagan steal his thunder after the election - is this not the case?
You act like the Middle East wasn't a mess before all this.Exactly...just wait till we see what become of the Middle East.Not good.This poll will be even more lopsided in ten years' time. W in a landslide.
So carter's shortcoming lead to the killing of a few American's and Bush's disastrous foreign policy has lead to the death of tens of thousands of innoncent persons.Good, glad we're on the same page here.Yeah, nothing like a military failure to hurt the legacy of a Prez.No. Carter tried a rescue and blew it.Can someone smarter and older than me elaborate on why Carter is considered such a miserable failure? Please include specifics if you don't mind.I've heard that he wasn't the "tough" guy on some issues, but was he a total failure?I've heard that Carter did most of the negotiating for the hostage release, only to have Reagan steal his thunder after the election - is this not the case?