Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
Maybe over the next 2-3 weeks.I think he'll get cheaper yet.
Then the window closes. Winston loves him & Godwin will only open things up by adding a legitimate weapon opposite Evans.
Maybe over the next 2-3 weeks.I think he'll get cheaper yet.
Yes, my thoughts exactly. He didn't do well with Fitz last year and probably won't to start the season this year either.Maybe over the next 2-3 weeks.
Then the window closes. Winston loves him & Godwin will only open things up by adding a legitimate weapon opposite Evans.
IMO the downtrend is the result of Evans being wholly dependent on volume in order to mask egregious inefficiency and more young talent (Howard, Godwin) joining the fray and eating into his target share. The dude just isn't going to command a 30% target share anymore and since he struggles to catch half of his targets that's no bueno. I think the window for him to be an elite WR1 has already opened and closed.I'm with Soulfly, I would not be looking to sell in dynasty. It seems like a lot of the downtrend in Evans' ADP is related to the current TB grease fire but I'm not sure that will be a huge hindrance to his production
Nah - Godwin is getting DJax targets, not Evans.IMO the downtrend is the result of Evans being wholly dependent on volume in order to mask egregious inefficiency and more young talent (Howard, Godwin) joining the fray and eating into his target share. The dude just isn't going to command a 30% target share anymore and since he struggles to catch half of his targets that's no bueno. I think the window for him to be an elite WR1 has already opened and closed.
DJax's adot last year was in line with his career average (~16 yards). Godwin (13.2) and Evans (13.8) see more similar targets, I don't think Godwin and DJax do the same thing. To be fair all of their WRs are dissimilar to some extent, including Humphries but Godwin is more likely to eat into Evans than he is DJax. And Godwin does some things better than Evans, predominately catch more of his short to intermediate targets. I'm sure Evans will see positive TD regression but I just don't see how he can vault back into elite WR1 territory unless he sees a third of the targets like he did in 2015 and 16 - and I don't think he will because TB has added too many weapons since he saw that type of target share. When he saw 30% of the targets in 2015 Charles Sims saw the second most with 13% and a washed up VJax saw 11%. In 2016 when Evans commanded a 30% target share, Humphries and Brate were tied in 2nd with 15%. Last year we began to see what the effect of adding more potent weapons looks like (Evans 23%, DJax 15%, Humphries 14%, Brate 14%, Godwin 10%). The targets were less concentrated and I do not see that reversing.Nah - Godwin is getting DJax targets, not Evans.
Evans was also just 1/9 on RZ targets last year. I don’t expect that to repeat either.
he only difference in Evans value the last 4 years is # of TDs.
There’s plenty of reason for optimism - that window is wide open.
I guess we’ll have to wait & see. I think Evans still has room to grow. He’s a 5th year player who’s seen turmoil at the QB position. He could still develop & become a better receiver, who can do more with fewer targets.DJax's adot last year was in line with his career average (~16 yards). Godwin (13.2) and Evans (13.8) see more similar targets, I don't think Godwin and DJax do the same thing. To be fair all of their WRs are dissimilar to some extent, including Humphries but Godwin is more likely to eat into Evans than he is DJax. And Godwin does some things better than Evans, predominately catch more of his short to intermediate targets. I'm sure Evans will see positive TD regression but I just don't see how he can vault back into elite WR1 territory unless he sees a third of the targets like he did in 2015 and 16 - and I don't think he will because TB has added too many weapons since he saw that type of target share. When he saw 30% of the targets in 2015 Charles Sims saw the second most with 13% and a washed up VJax saw 11%. In 2016 when Evans commanded a 30% target share, Humphries and Brate were tied in 2nd with 15%. Last year we began to see what the effect of adding more potent weapons looks like (Evans 23%, DJax 15%, Humphries 14%, Brate 14%, Godwin 10%). The targets were less concentrated and I do not see that reversing.
I know Evans' efficiency stats aren't great and I've seen him be less than sure-handed at times but he is such a physically dominant player, routinely making plays that very few WRs could make. And he's been the only show in town in the TB passing game for much of his career. Getting repeatedly force fed the ball doesn't typically lead to the best efficiency numbers. I hate to fade a player with such obvious ability based on that kind of projection, I think we could see his targets go down but his efficiency go upIMO the downtrend is the result of Evans being wholly dependent on volume in order to mask egregious inefficiency and more young talent (Howard, Godwin) joining the fray and eating into his target share. The dude just isn't going to command a 30% target share anymore and since he struggles to catch half of his targets that's no bueno. I think the window for him to be an elite WR1 has already opened and closed.
Eh, the Giants have Shepard, Engram, and Barkley commanding targets but Beckham will still have a huge season. Winston missing 3 games sucks, but he looks much more focused this preseason. In dynasty, if you can buy Evans, you must.DJax's adot last year was in line with his career average (~16 yards). Godwin (13.2) and Evans (13.8) see more similar targets, I don't think Godwin and DJax do the same thing. To be fair all of their WRs are dissimilar to some extent, including Humphries but Godwin is more likely to eat into Evans than he is DJax. And Godwin does some things better than Evans, predominately catch more of his short to intermediate targets. I'm sure Evans will see positive TD regression but I just don't see how he can vault back into elite WR1 territory unless he sees a third of the targets like he did in 2015 and 16 - and I don't think he will because TB has added too many weapons since he saw that type of target share. When he saw 30% of the targets in 2015 Charles Sims saw the second most with 13% and a washed up VJax saw 11%. In 2016 when Evans commanded a 30% target share, Humphries and Brate were tied in 2nd with 15%. Last year we began to see what the effect of adding more potent weapons looks like (Evans 23%, DJax 15%, Humphries 14%, Brate 14%, Godwin 10%). The targets were less concentrated and I do not see that reversing.
Evans has always seen more than 121 targets (122, 147, 172 and 136 in 4 season) and he's never eclipsed a 56% catch percentage (55%, 50%, 56%, 52% in 4 seasons). Here is the list of players and the number of seasons in which they saw 121+ targets and were unable to eclipse a 56% catch percentage since Evans joined the league.Getting repeatedly force fed the ball doesn't typically lead to the best efficiency numbers.
For sure. I respect the statistical argument you're making. And I don't disagree that Evans' value needs to be adjusted down a bit, but seeing him on the board as the 4th round approaches feels like a complete fire sale. Maybe I'm being stubborn but I'm not prepared to mark him down nearly that much, I still think he has special traitsEvans has always seen more than 121 targets (122, 147, 172 and 136 in 4 season) and he's never eclipsed a 56% catch percentage (55%, 50%, 56%, 52% in 4 seasons). Here is the list of players and the number of seasons in which they saw 121+ targets and were unable to eclipse a 56% catch percentage since Evans joined the league.
So although you can expect players to see a dip in efficiency when they see more volume Evans looks to be the most extreme case.
Yeah and I understand the size + speed argument and I also don't know how much Winston is to blame for the inefficiency but I just don't see a ton of upside when he's being taken as the 11th or 12th WR off the board. I think he could finish as a WR2 again this year which isn't to say he'll be a complete bust but I always end up passing on him. If he finishes as a high-end WR1 this year I'm 100% prepared to eat crow.For sure. I respect the statistical argument you're making. And I don't disagree that Evans' value needs to be adjusted down a bit, but seeing him on the board as the 4th round approaches feels like a complete fire sale. Maybe I'm being stubborn but I'm not prepared to mark him down nearly that much, I still think he has special traits
This is what I wonder too, all we have to work with are the catch rates of Evans' fellow receivers. Like in CAR, we know Newton is inaccurate because all of his WRs always have piss poor catch rates and when they move teams they improve. Ginn's adot may have fallen a tad but he went from catching 57% of his targets with Newton to 76% (and no drops) with Brees. Benjamin posted his first 60%+ catch rate after moving to BUF.Does anyone here have a sense of whether his targets have been high/low quality? I admit I haven't watched him a lot.
As for Godwin, if he is the real deal and emerges, I think it can only help Evans in terms of quality of targets, but then the workload question comes up.
32 points in my League... U tell em SF!Got him in the 3rd, and own him in dynasty.
Would take a TON to get him from me, ppl are ridiculous.
Isnt he only the 2nd player to have 4 consecutive 1000yd seasons at his age?
Mike Evans hauled in 6-of-11 targets for 137 yards and one touchdown in the Bucs' Week 3 loss to the Steelers.
Evans was given chance after chance downfield and delivered, fighting through double-coverage multiple times to eventually finish with 137 yards. Normally DeSean Jackson would join him in the mix downfield, but it was primarily Evans and Chris Godwin (5-74-1) who were trusted with jump-balls throughout the evening. Now at 23-367-3 on the year, Evans remains a strong WR1 whether it's Ryan Fitzpatrick or Jameis Winston under center in Week 4.
Sep 25 - 1:09 AM
remind me again why people were avoiding him?Got him in the 3rd, and own him in dynasty.
Would take a TON to get him from me, ppl are ridiculous.
Isnt he only the 2nd player to have 4 consecutive 1000yd seasons at his age?
It was probably having Jameis as his QB that scared away people.remind me again why people were avoiding him?
was it tying the above record that turned folks off, orrrr???
I sold him early this year. Last year was not fun to own him. I think he’s a beneficiary of the magic right now which may or may not continue for a couple reasons. Sellers remorse currently. Just saying last year sucked.It was probably having Jameis as his QB that scared away people.
I had him his rookie year, and last year. The yards have always been there, the TDs have been fickle.I sold him early this year. Last year was not fun to own him. I think he’s a beneficiary of the magic right now which may or may not continue for a couple reasons. Sellers remorse currently. Just saying last year sucked.
Seems to score a boatload of TDs every second year and he is due. Toot Toot
I don’t want to pick on SameSongNDance because I've generally found your analysis to be sharp but I think it’s worth revisiting this debate to make one point. Analytics are a powerful tool but to me at least they should always be secondary to good old-fashioned talent evaluation. Football isn’t like baseball, there are a myriad of interconnected factors that can be hard to parse and distill into statistics. And a lot of the stats we do have are not particularly sticky / predictive. I think it’s better not to rely on target and efficiency projections too much and to break ties in favor of raw football ability. If your statistical model predicts that Mike Evans is a WR2, scrap it and go with the eyeball method because he is really f*cking good.IMO the downtrend is the result of Evans being wholly dependent on volume in order to mask egregious inefficiency and more young talent (Howard, Godwin) joining the fray and eating into his target share. The dude just isn't going to command a 30% target share anymore and since he struggles to catch half of his targets that's no bueno. I think the window for him to be an elite WR1 has already opened and closed.
Nah, it's cool I deserve to be picked on for my take. I was going to come in here and eat crow eventually but I wanted to wait until we at least reached the halfway mark. But Evans did break his 100+ yard drought as soon as week 1.I don’t want to pick on SameSongNDance because I've generally found your analysis to be sharp but I think it’s worth revisiting this debate to make one point. Analytics are a powerful tool but to me at least they should always be secondary to good old-fashioned talent evaluation. Football isn’t like baseball, there are a myriad of interconnected factors that can be hard to parse and distill into statistics. And a lot of the stats we do have are not particularly sticky / predictive. I think it’s better not to rely on target and efficiency projections too much and to break ties in favor of raw football ability. If your statistical model predicts that Mike Evans is a WR2, scrap it and go with the eyeball method because he is really f*cking good.
I think there’s more than a chance Winston plays this season, I think it’s close to an inevitability. I also agree that Evans is unlikely to maintain his current pace. But there aren’t 12 fantasy WRs who are better than him or who I’d rather have on my team, I guess that’s my main point.Nah, it's cool I deserve to be picked on for my take. I was going to come in here and eat crow eventually but I wanted to wait until we at least reached the halfway mark. But Evans did break his 100+ yard drought as soon as week 1.
I did mention somewhere in here that it could be Winston that has bogged Evans down and there's obviously still a chance Winston plays this season although I don't know if or when that may happen. But also, Fitz has gotten off to a historical pace - this was something no model or method could even remotely predict. If you told someone that Fitz would be the owner of 1230/11/4 line after the first 3 weeks of the season they'd wonder what you were smoking. So unless we think Fitz is going to finish the year with a 6,600 yards and 59 TDs I think it's kind of safe to assume Evans pace will slow down, along with Godwin, DJax and Howard.
Do you think that will be the case when Winston is back under center? What if now is just a great time to sell high?I think there’s more than a chance Winston plays this season, I think it’s close to an inevitability. I also agree that Evans is unlikely to maintain his current pace. But there aren’t 12 fantasy WRs who are better than him or who I’d rather have on my team, I guess that’s my main point.
To be clear, my greater point is that taking such a stats-based approach is a bit of a high wire act, one variable changes and your whole model can go to #####. I’d rather go with the playground approach of just taking the best players. I do make adjustments based on situation but that’s more like fine tuning and not at the core of my player rankings.Do you think that will be the case when Winston is back under center? What if now is just a great time to sell high?
That’s what occurred to me as well.That's a reasonable take. But Fitz has being throw more catchable balls his whole career vs Winston. Winston is not an accurate passer.
You actually have to wonder how much of Evans low catch% is just playing with Winston.
But the positive when/if Winston comes back is volume for Evans.
I agree with everything you're saying.That's a reasonable take. But Fitz has being throw more catchable balls his whole career vs Winston. Winston is not an accurate passer.
You actually have to wonder how much of Evans low catch% is just playing with Winston.
But the positive when/if Winston comes back is volume for Evans.
As I said here & elsewhere, he passed the eye test. He’s a big, physical WR who can win battles against most DBs.Lotta chit chat going on in here using fancy words and theorems....
But mike evans is just damn good, no analysis necessary
This is why we have to listen to all the negativity...Lotta chit chat going on in here using fancy words and theorems....
But mike evans is just damn good, no analysis necessary
Did you watch Winston in the preseason at all?My only concern with him is Winston.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but Winston played against a lot of 2nd teamers where he should shine. That's an unfair comparison to a MNF game. And Fitz looked better than Winston in the preseason. For example, Winston had another of those boneheaded throws into triple coverage one preseason game he was lucky was caught.Hot Sauce Guy said:Did you watch Winston in the preseason at all?
He looked significantly better than Fitzmagic did on SNF.
Fitz threw just head scratching Ints - that was a horrific game. Sure, he ended up with 400+ and 3, but the picks, and especially the pick-6, were brutal.
And at the end, with the game on the line, a legit chance to win, or at least tie, he melted down completely - stared down his receivers & threw into double coverage, twice in a row. He should have had another pick.
i could see Winston’s return helping Peyton Barber, and I’m not so sure the WRs would take a huge hit. Maybe DeSean Jackson, but the chances he stays healthy all year are slim anyway.
For all Fitz's failures he's played better in 2018 thanWinstonanyone has ever played.
I don't want to be a jerk, but it's not helpful to understand the player value when you post a ridiculously lopsided deal with a dummy owner.I’m close to getting Evans/Miller/Goff for AB/Buck Allen/ Ben
may have to go Mack instead of Allen.
So you would go Mack if you had to?I don't want to be a jerk, but it's not helpful to understand the player value when you post a ridiculously lopsided deal with a dummy owner.
Ironically I came in here for a legit dynasty price check contribution. In .5ppr I'm offering Dion, early 1st and late 1st to WR rich RB poor (has Henry) owner.
For sake of thread and value discussion, in a vacuum this deal gets done, but owner is worried it will make my team too good.
So ME going rate of two firsts + part feels about right to me
Wrong forum. If that's dynasty you are already stealing it doesn't matter if it's Mack or Allen.So you would go Mack if you had to?
As for yours I’d do it.
As an Evans owner that offer seems pretty lowball, Dion Lewis is on the worst offense in football in a timeshare situation. Evans is in the god tier for dyno alongside basically 3 other guys in Hopkins, Odell, and Thomas. I would need the conversation to start at around four firsts in total value. If one of your picks ended up being the 1.1 we could reevaluate come draft time.Ironically I came in here for a legit dynasty price check contribution. In .5ppr I'm offering Dion, early 1st and late 1st to WR rich RB poor (has Henry) owner.
For sake of thread and value discussion, in a vacuum this deal gets done, but owner is worried it will make my team too good.
So ME going rate of two firsts + part feels about right to me
I think the taste of a disappointing 2017 lingers with this owner as well as the specter of Winston returning bringing back those dud days of last year. Might not be an uncommon line of thinking.As an Evans owner that offer seems pretty lowball, Dion Lewis is on the worst offense in football in a timeshare situation. Evans is in the god tier for dyno alongside basically 3 other guys in Hopkins, Odell, and Thomas. I would need the conversation to start at around four firsts in total value. If one of your picks ended up being the 1.1 we could reevaluate come draft time.