zamboni
Footballguy
Et tu, Jeremy?It’s also just a report by Jeremy Fowler, who may be plugged in, but no one knows for sure what the game plan is and the Bucs’ coaches certainly aren’t going to divulge it.
Et tu, Jeremy?It’s also just a report by Jeremy Fowler, who may be plugged in, but no one knows for sure what the game plan is and the Bucs’ coaches certainly aren’t going to divulge it.
Final tally was 12 targets on 38 snaps (55% snap rate)Doesn’t need to play 90% of the snaps to produce. Even if he plays half the snaps and has a high target to route run rate, that could lead to a solid game.
They will be playing from behind,so highly doubt itQJ might get 35 carries in that gameBetween Evans, McLaurin and Judkins for final flex. Leaning McLaurin currently.
Final tally was 12 targets on 38 snaps (55% snap rate)Doesn’t need to play 90% of the snaps to produce. Even if he plays half the snaps and has a high target to route run rate, that could lead to a solid game.
Moral of the story: don’t always listen to the beat writers
Godwin did play 96% but probably as much for his blocking than anything.Final tally was 12 targets on 38 snaps (55% snap rate)Doesn’t need to play 90% of the snaps to produce. Even if he plays half the snaps and has a high target to route run rate, that could lead to a solid game.
Moral of the story: don’t always listen to the beat writers
Exactly. Does any WR play 100% of snaps in a game?
Actually, the beat writer was accurate. He didn't play the full complement of snaps, but when he was out there they targeted him heavily.Final tally was 12 targets on 38 snaps (55% snap rate)Doesn’t need to play 90% of the snaps to produce. Even if he plays half the snaps and has a high target to route run rate, that could lead to a solid game.
Moral of the story: don’t always listen to the beat writers
Fair point - although based on the tweet/ interview citing “snap count” and “only important downs”, I don’t think most expected a 55% snap count. Took a bit of gumption to take a chance that he’d be incorporated as much as he was last night.Actually, the beat writer was accurate. He didn't play the full complement of snaps, but when he was out there they targeted him heavily.Final tally was 12 targets on 38 snaps (55% snap rate)Doesn’t need to play 90% of the snaps to produce. Even if he plays half the snaps and has a high target to route run rate, that could lead to a solid game.
Moral of the story: don’t always listen to the beat writers
I said before the game that beat report was a Rohrschach test. You could interpret it to support whatever your pre-existing belief was
I read that report as saying they would target him in the red zone (which they did on 1st and goal from the 1, though he didn't catch it) and I thought that alone made him worth a gamble. The deep passes were a pleasant surpriseFair point - although based on the tweet/ interview citing “snap count” and “only important downs”, I don’t think most expected a 55% snap count. Took a bit of gumption to take a chance that he’d be incorporated as much as he was last night.Actually, the beat writer was accurate. He didn't play the full complement of snaps, but when he was out there they targeted him heavily.Final tally was 12 targets on 38 snaps (55% snap rate)Doesn’t need to play 90% of the snaps to produce. Even if he plays half the snaps and has a high target to route run rate, that could lead to a solid game.
Moral of the story: don’t always listen to the beat writers
I said before the game that beat report was a Rohrschach test. You could interpret it to support whatever your pre-existing belief was
I have Chase, Rice, Evans, and Jamo Williams.I sure hope to roll out Chase, Rice and Evans in championship week, the irony not lost on me that i'd have a much better chance of making it if I just trusted Evans enough to use him last night.