What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Mike Evans, TB (3 Viewers)

Doesn’t need to play 90% of the snaps to produce. Even if he plays half the snaps and has a high target to route run rate, that could lead to a solid game.
Final tally was 12 targets on 38 snaps (55% snap rate)

Moral of the story: don’t always listen to the beat writers

Exactly. Does any WR play 100% of snaps in a game?
Godwin did play 96% but probably as much for his blocking than anything.
 
Doesn’t need to play 90% of the snaps to produce. Even if he plays half the snaps and has a high target to route run rate, that could lead to a solid game.
Final tally was 12 targets on 38 snaps (55% snap rate)

Moral of the story: don’t always listen to the beat writers
Actually, the beat writer was accurate. He didn't play the full complement of snaps, but when he was out there they targeted him heavily.

I said before the game that beat report was a Rohrschach test. You could interpret it to support whatever your pre-existing belief was
 
Doesn’t need to play 90% of the snaps to produce. Even if he plays half the snaps and has a high target to route run rate, that could lead to a solid game.
Final tally was 12 targets on 38 snaps (55% snap rate)

Moral of the story: don’t always listen to the beat writers
Actually, the beat writer was accurate. He didn't play the full complement of snaps, but when he was out there they targeted him heavily.

I said before the game that beat report was a Rohrschach test. You could interpret it to support whatever your pre-existing belief was
Fair point - although based on the tweet/ interview citing “snap count” and “only important downs”, I don’t think most expected a 55% snap count. Took a bit of gumption to take a chance that he’d be incorporated as much as he was last night.
 
Doesn’t need to play 90% of the snaps to produce. Even if he plays half the snaps and has a high target to route run rate, that could lead to a solid game.
Final tally was 12 targets on 38 snaps (55% snap rate)

Moral of the story: don’t always listen to the beat writers
Actually, the beat writer was accurate. He didn't play the full complement of snaps, but when he was out there they targeted him heavily.

I said before the game that beat report was a Rohrschach test. You could interpret it to support whatever your pre-existing belief was
Fair point - although based on the tweet/ interview citing “snap count” and “only important downs”, I don’t think most expected a 55% snap count. Took a bit of gumption to take a chance that he’d be incorporated as much as he was last night.
I read that report as saying they would target him in the red zone (which they did on 1st and goal from the 1, though he didn't catch it) and I thought that alone made him worth a gamble. The deep passes were a pleasant surprise
 
This guy is a league winner and I missed the boat.

I've had my back against the wall with a short bench and 0 IR spots... I had to roster Lamb through injury and play whack-a-mole with my WR's all year (Rome Odunze & Ladd McConkey owner).

Sometimes, you have to play the short game to even get to the long game. I am in the playoffs but would feel a lot better with Evans over McConkey but prior to last night's game - they both had their own flaws... I like Mike Evans >>>>>>>>>> McConkey for the remaining weeks of fantasy. He is a fringe WR1 with his TD upside.
 
I sure hope to roll out Chase, Rice and Evans in championship week, the irony not lost on me that i'd have a much better chance of making it if I just trusted Evans enough to use him last night.
 
Can't believe I snoozed on Evans after he broke collar bone.
A player like him I usually scoop up after being dropped and put on ir.
I guess with Embukas explosion to start the year,kinda made me forget Abt him n think he wouldn't be back in time for fantasy playoffs.

And I probably wouldn't of started him first game back.

Next game will be the Godwin/Embukas show if I did start him and get 4/40 out of him..

Isn't this game fun.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top