Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Mike Bell vs. Cadillac (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter tuffnutt
- Start date
SeniorVBDStudent
Footballguy
I owned lucky Pierre last year....NO would be crazy to replace Bell with Thomas imo...
SleeperPix
Footballguy
Barring injuries??? Caddy, and it's not close
War Eagle
Footballguy
This is a great question.
My GUESS is that whichever one stays the healthiest.
Folks can deny it, turn a deaf ear to it, but bottom line is that Bell has talent, was recognized for it in the pre-season, came out and took advantage of an opportunity running hard and the coaching staff is already saying he has carved out a place for carries and will battle with Pierre for touches.....AKA Pierre has to earn his way BACK in.
Caddy looked healthy. He ran HARD! Maybe too hard. He runs so violently that I just can't see him staying healthy. WISH he would, he's a bad man that's never had a full season to show it outside the rookie year.
My GUESS is that whichever one stays the healthiest.
Folks can deny it, turn a deaf ear to it, but bottom line is that Bell has talent, was recognized for it in the pre-season, came out and took advantage of an opportunity running hard and the coaching staff is already saying he has carved out a place for carries and will battle with Pierre for touches.....AKA Pierre has to earn his way BACK in.
Caddy looked healthy. He ran HARD! Maybe too hard. He runs so violently that I just can't see him staying healthy. WISH he would, he's a bad man that's never had a full season to show it outside the rookie year.
BobbyLayne
Footballguy
Bell has talent but its all relative; in NOLA he is no better than the 3rd stringer RB, FB, special teams, etc.
If everyone gets and stays healthy, Bell loses his job, Caddy doesn't.
If everyone gets and stays healthy, Bell loses his job, Caddy doesn't.
Gopher State
Footballguy
Caddy and don't think twice
thriftyrocker
Footballguy
Caddy has more talent and a better chance of sticking barring injury. But he has much less upside. 50% share on a bad team. Not involved in the passing game. Goalline TBD (maybe Graham gets some there).
Three headed monster in NO is just as valuable. And if Pierre actually goes down or isn't as effective, goldmine.
Three headed monster in NO is just as valuable. And if Pierre actually goes down or isn't as effective, goldmine.
SleeperPix
Footballguy
Caddy got it at the goalline and put it in. And "if" Pierre goes down.......what is Ward goes down???
thehornet
Footballguy
3rd Stringer? What?Reggie Bush isnt a Running Back anymore. Isn't that clear?
thriftyrocker
Footballguy
Graham gets carries. I just don't think the team would give him a full workload. Maybe ever. At least for the next 10 weeks or so.
War Eagle
Footballguy
Folks just don't get it....he plays the new X position.
Folks just don't get it....he plays the new X position.
thehornet
Footballguy
well played, but you know the truth.someone should tell NO they have him listed as the #1 RBWar Eagle said:thehornet said:Folks just don't get it....he plays the new X position.
az_prof
Footballguy
But isn't TB as much of a three headed monster as NO, with Ward (getting lots of money), Graham (the reliable vet), and Caddy? How do we know that Caddy will be featured or even get the lion share of carries any given week? Seems similar to Bush, Thomas, and Bell. Beyond who is the 'starter', which is inclonclusive, you might say NO has a more explosive offense and so all those RBs are worth more than the TB guys. Or, you might say that the focus in NO will always be the pass and this week Bell was an exception to the rule who benefited from a blowout. Or, do you try to figure out what role the guy will have and match it to your scoring system? This last seems the best way to compare these guys.travdogg said:
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar threads
