Buckfast 1 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 I'm debating starting Hasselbeck, Houshmandzadeh, and Burleson against the favorable Arizona passing defense matchup. I have an alternative QB and an alternative WR that are ranked almost identically to Hasselbeck and Burleson. As a general matter, do you think you would take the risk of starting three players from one offense in a favorable matchup and hope for a big day or do you think it is better to diversify your risks by starting other players? My guess is that the first option is probably bigger risk/reward whereas the second option is safer. Any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.