Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I don't know that they'll pull him again during a game like Chicago. My argument is that the $21M injury guarantee is not something they're (the Glazers) are worried about. If they were he'd be inactive on game days. As it is he's been the backup and if Fitz were injured in game he'd be playing. They have Ryan Griffin on the roster as well, so if they were 100% sure they were moving on from Winston after this year Griffin would be active and backing up Fitz.
Between the 2 of them, they've thrown 18 INTs in the last 7 games. Maybe coaches keep swapping them out so that neither sets a record for turnovers.
It'd be pretty remarkable if ownership were making gameday inactive decisions. That's Jerry Jones level meddling. At least he's the GM.
So you don't think if the owner had already made the decision to move on from Winston after this year they wouldn't tell the coaching staff to make him inactive to insure he doesn't get injured?
To clarify, I didn't mean to imply you're wrong here. Just making the point that what you're suggesting would be a pretty astonishing level of meddling.
My point is simply that anyone counting on Fitz to remain the starter for the rest of the season for fantasy purposes shouldn't be. He is on a short leash. As is Koetter.
Fitz might be inconsistent and may melt down, but I don't think the cold has any bearing on things. He played most of his college and nfl career in cold cities.
22 INTs in the last 8 games. Just keep swapping them out so that neither ends up with a 40 INT season on their resume.
They have no o-line and below average skill players so I doubt Fitzmagic is going to happen.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
