Anarchy99
Footballguy
He averaged 7.2 ypc in college. That’s pretty close to what Michel averaged per game in 2019.
He averaged 7.2 ypc in college. That’s pretty close to what Michel averaged per game in 2019.
Could be but Bolden is there for special teams so someone has to beat him out in that area.I was thinking there goes Bolden(assuming he is still on the team). Over the cap shows they can save 1.5 million but have a 0.5 million cap hit if they cut Bolden. Sony actually seemed better to me when he got in last season.
looks like a safety with Chung upside and a swing tackle. both need to develop.Blackbear said:These last few picks... anything interesting about these guys? Seems kind of ho hum.
Yes this is true. His profile said he has special teams high upside. Also, this tweet says he played special teams at Oklahoma.Boston said:Could be but Bolden is there for special teams so someone has to beat him out in that area.
Thanks for clearing that up for Cam.Anarchy99 said:I saw that that is probably not likely to be his actual number. Just a prop for a photo opp. His college number was 10.
??? It says right in the article Terry already signed with SEA.Hopefully Pats get in on the udfa bidding for Terry. https://www.tomahawknation.com/florida-state-football-fsu-seminoles/2021/5/1/22414924/free-agent-tracker-undrafted-marvin-wilson-round-selection-pick-contract-team-nfl-tamorrion-sign
They updated the article. Originally, when I posted, it was questioning where they would go.??? It says right in the article Terry already signed with SEA.
Yes. Wynn also. From what I have seen, they supposedly are far more inclined to pick of Wynn's option than Michel's. The logic being Wynn has played pretty well when on the field and competent tackles are harder to come by. Michel, on the other hand, won't be in high demand from other teams and won't be worth what they would have to pay him. If they decided they wanted him back, they could simply re-sign him for less than the 5th year option cost.I think tomorrow is deadline to see if Patriots pick up Michel fifth year option.
Plus, Wynn might be low mileage this year behind Brown at tackle. So could him as a 1b at left tackle and fill in for the inevitable injuries where Onwenu goes to guard if someone is injured on the interior. Michel seems to be injury prone, and I doubt he makes it an entire feature back and as such he wouldn’t be worth the 5.5 million option. Both guys had a ton of promise when drafted and both have had a lot of lost games due to injuries.Yes. Wynn also. From what I have seen, they supposedly are far more inclined to pick of Wynn's option than Michel's. The logic being Wynn has played pretty well when on the field and competent tackles are harder to come by. Michel, on the other hand, won't be in high demand from other teams and won't be worth what they would have to pay him. If they decided they wanted him back, they could simply re-sign him for less than the 5th year option cost.
Just curious why you think Wynn would play less? I would expect the starting tackles to be Brown and Wynn and Onwenu and Mason at guard.Plus, Wynn might be low mileage this year behind Brown at tackle. So could him as a 1b at left tackle and fill in for the inevitable injuries where Onwenu goes to guard if someone is injured on the interior. Michel seems to be injury prone, and I doubt he makes it an entire feature back and as such he wouldn’t be worth the 5.5 million option. Both guys had a ton of promise when drafted and both have had a lot of lost games due to injuries.
NE still has an $8M cap hit to navigate for when Chung officially retires (submitted on paper). They will likely wait until 6/1 and then they will have a $4.3M cap hit for this year and a $3.6M cap hit for next year. So as they stand now, they are at around $11M in cap space.I looked at our top 51 and tried to project the final 53. It appears as though after cuts that are straight forward with no bold moves... the amount recovered by cutting some guys and replacing with cheaper options is offset by paying the top rookies this season that would get over the top 51 threshold. So I expect not much change in the salary cap from where we are now due to roster cuts and rookie signings. However, it was said either here or on sport radio we can expect a bump in pay for Gilmore to the tune of 5 million. So if that happens and not other big cuts or signings occur I think Pats would be left at 10 or 11 million in cap space.
Well I would have Brown at left tackle. In 2018 he played great there. Some of that allure was how he got out in space and road graded too. For our team that is a heavy plus. However when he went to Raiders he got gimpy, and I had heard he is a bit less mobile now and perhaps carrying too much weight. Combine that with Wynn being injury prone I think in my brain on average we might get on starting tackle our of both of them. Hopefully, and it would be great, if both play to potential and don’t get injured. With Onwenu, I saw a consistent improvement at right tackle throughout the season. So this is why I am thinking Onwenu will play a lot of right tackle as Brown and Wynn might be gimpy at times.Just curious why you think Wynn would play less? I would expect the starting tackles to be Brown and Wynn and Onwenu and Mason at guard.
I had already factored in 7.5 million in dead cap money for the guys not on the foster which includes Chung and Edelman retiring.NE still has an $8M cap hit to navigate for when Chung officially retires (submitted on paper). They will likely wait until 6/1 and then they will have a $4.3M cap hit for this year and a $3.6M cap hit for next year. So as they stand now, they are at around $11M in cap space.
Plus I don't think they are anywhere close to done with tinkering with the roster. They will make a trade or two or bring in guys cut from other rosters between now and September. Depending upon who is involved, they might have dead money if they move one of their own players. As you said, if they bring someone else in, the increase to the cap is only whatever amount is above Player 51 in terms of salary (so roughly any salary over around $850K).
They could make more cap space by cutting or restructuring contracts, but at this point it doesn't look like they have a pressing need to do so.
I should tell you I have them cutting 9 players current in the top 51. I just think certain guys that are getting paid more than others contribute nothing meaningful relatively.NE still has an $8M cap hit to navigate for when Chung officially retires (submitted on paper). They will likely wait until 6/1 and then they will have a $4.3M cap hit for this year and a $3.6M cap hit for next year. So as they stand now, they are at around $11M in cap space.
Plus I don't think they are anywhere close to done with tinkering with the roster. They will make a trade or two or bring in guys cut from other rosters between now and September. Depending upon who is involved, they might have dead money if they move one of their own players. As you said, if they bring someone else in, the increase to the cap is only whatever amount is above Player 51 in terms of salary (so roughly any salary over around $850K).
They could make more cap space by cutting or restructuring contracts, but at this point it doesn't look like they have a pressing need to do so.
Patscap and Spotrac both have NE currently at $15.5M, but IIRC Chung's retirement is not included in that. The best thing they could do at this point is extend Gilmore, which would give him more money and reduce his 2021 cap number. Whether that is advisable or not is a different question.I had already factored in 7.5 million in dead cap money for the guys not on the foster which includes Chung and Edelman retiring.
Which 9 guys are you including in that list?I should tell you I have them cutting 9 players current in the top 51. I just think certain guys that are getting paid more than others contribute nothing meaningful relatively.
*Matt LacosseWhich 9 guys are you including in that list?
*Matt Lacosse - I doubt they keep 5 TE and LaCosse would be the most likely candidate to get cut (or traded if they can con someone into giving up anything for him).*Matt Lacosse
*Akeem Spence
*Tashawn Bower
*Leroy Reynolds
*Cody Davis
*Brandon King
*Raekwon McMillan
*Dan Vitale
*Brandon Bolden
*Anfernee Jennings
Martin is not in top 51. So that is irrelevant.*Matt Lacosse - I doubt they keep 5 TE and LaCosse would be the most likely candidate to get cut (or traded if they can con someone into giving up anything for him).
*Akeem Spence - Spence was dirt cheap last year but his salary triples this year. No value add to the roster. I agree his days are numbered.
*Tashawn Bower - Similar situation as Spence.
*LaRoy Reynolds - Reynolds seems redundant at LB . . . but they just signed him this off season. Maybe he is a special teams specialist?
*Cody Davis - Davis isn't getting cut. They just signed him and guaranteed him $2.1M.
*Brandon King - He's been there for 6 years . . . sure they could cut him, but htey could have done that any number of times and haven't.
*Raekwon McMillan - Another new signee. Unlike Davis, he was only guaranteed $250K, so he is on the fence for making the roster.
*Dan Vitale - Vitale, Dalton Keene, and Jakob Johnson could be fighting for one roster spot. Vitale is the most expensive and would cost a few hundred thousand against the cap when the other guys wouldn't cost anything. So his spot is definitely in jeopardy.
*Brandon Bolden - BB loves him and he's been around for ever. He even left and came back. I would be a little bit surprised if they released him. They sort of already paid him for this year with what they paid him when he signed his latest contract. They will move on from guys when they feel like they made a mistake. I am just not sure they view Bolden as a bad investment.
*Anfernee Jennings - Bill will almost always give drafted players 2 years with the team before he moves on. I don't see them releasing Jennings. They might trade him or Winovich, but I don't they flat out cut them.
Another player I would consider in the moving on from list is Joejuan Williams. Hereally hasn't played much. They signed G Marcus Martin this off season and guaranteed close to nothing of his contract. Not many other guys on the roster jump out as mostly roster filler players who could be cut.
Martin is on the books for $1,056,470 and counts as one of the Top 51. His contract is the same as Bower's, so if one made it into the Top 51 then they both did.Martin is not in top 51. So that is irrelevant.
Jowaun Williams I had them keeping. But I could be convinced he can be cut. Though his contract doesn’t seem in line with a cut given his potential.
You highlighted my biggest weakness or decision which was Cody Davis. I might be convinced easily to change my thoughts.
I tried to combine pure talent and money involved.
Not likely I get everything right, but at least I took a stab. You should post your inside top 51 cuts for clarity.
Maybe then the numbers here are wrong for Martin? https://overthecap.com/salary-cap/new-england-patriots/Martin is on the books for $1,056,470 and counts as one of the Top 51. His contract is the same as Bower's, so if one made it into the Top 51 then they both did.
At that point in the roster hierarchy, they are looking at $150,000 or so in cap savings (less whatever they would take on in dead cap money from bonuses). IMO, they care more about the fit and depth of the players, not so much if they would save $100,000 or so against the cap.
They will bring in and let go a number of players between now and 4 months until w get to September. There are any number of guys in the $1.2M or less category that could turnover and really not impact their cap situation very much.
As I said, there are a ton of guys crammed together in relatively close proximity on the Top 51 bubble (and several of which will chance by opening day).Maybe then the numbers here are wrong for Martin? https://overthecap.com/salary-cap/new-england-patriots/
So this may explain the reason we are off by a few million. You still didn’t give me your top inside top 51 cuts.As I said, there are a ton of guys crammed together in relatively close proximity on the Top 51 bubble (and several of which will chance by opening day).
HERE are the numbers that Spotrac uses. I use them only because I find their layout easier to read.
I would say the leading candidates are Lacosse, Spence, Bower, Vitale, Martin, Williams. But a lot will depend who they sniff around on as far as cuts go from other teams (or even their own players).So this may explain the reason we are off by a few million. You still didn’t give me your top inside top 51 cuts.
So many clowns on that radio station, they just live for complaining.I will call it like I see it. From me else where in NY Jets thread...
”We have transplant Zolak that is evidently coked up everyday because he never did #### as a QB. His cohost is a tub of butter.
Felger is a GreenBay guy that searches each day to be controversial. Mazz is a puppet for him.
Two shows prime time to do nothing but aggravate people. Call into their show and you never get to ask a legit question.
Can’t wait for tomorrow when they #### on Patriots picks again.
This is the worst sense of click bait, this 98.5. Their existince is to serve piss off New England fans. I bet not one of those yards played. ”
If he plays like he did last year he will be on the bench by week 8...Bobby Kraft did not pay all that money to lose games because of incompetent QB play...if Cam plays well than things are even better as you don’t have to rush Jones.Lombardi doesn’t think Jones will play until 2022. LINK
I do think BB somehow is pot committed to Cam this season. Not sure why, but I think Newton will play way more this season than people here want.
I agree re: commitment to Cam. Everything Bill does is a siege mentality from the bunker. Cam was nothing but the good soldier last year despite no camp / low pay / getting covid / no weapons / getting blasted in the court of public opinion, and I'm sure nothing would tickle BB more than to see Cam go ham and break the top 5.Lombardi doesn’t think Jones will play until 2022. LINK
I do think BB somehow is pot committed to Cam this season. Not sure why, but I think Newton will play way more this season than people here want.
I remember vividly arguing with friends in a bar over Brady vs. Bledsoe to the point where one of my "Bledsoe" friends stormed out of the bar.I think some of you are trying too hard to analyze Bill Belichick's state of mind. And by doing so, you're making this much too complex.
Belichick will play the quarterback which he thinks will give the Patriots the best chance to win. Right now, he thinks that's Cam Newton. But, he'll give Mac Jones every chance to earn the job.
When Week 1 comes, if Belichick thinks Mac Jones is the better quarterback, then Jones will be the starter. Belichick will make the unemotional and practical choice.
Belichick was willing to permanently replace Drew Bledsoe in 2001 in Week 11 with six games remaining in the season. Tom Brady was only 5-3 in his first eight starts.
And remember, Bledosoe signed a ten-year, $103 million contract in March of 2001. He was supposed to be the Patriots' quarterback for the rest of his career. Moving from Bledsoe to Brady permanently was not an obvious choice.
For this reason you would have to think Josh Mcdaniels will have a lot to say about who starts at QB.One strange thing is that the offensive installed may favor one QB and not the other. It seems they had to change the playbook to suit Newton. Maybe a lot of the designed runs and RPO are not what you’d call if Jones is in there. Should be interesting to hear from pfw guys if they are allowed to watch practices.
I waver between whether it is comedy or idiocy the fact that some people believe that a year after TB12 won a Super Bowl that BB will continue playing Cam if he plays like last year and they hover around .500 with an inept offense and a first round rookie on the bench who by all accounts projects to be NFL ready pretty quickly.I remember vividly arguing with friends in a bar over Brady vs. Bledsoe to the point where one of my "Bledsoe" friends stormed out of the bar.
The likes of Felger and Mazz keep saying that "Bill is in bed with Cam" next year, but history shows that Bill is going to put the guy on the field who gives him the best chance to win.