One More Rep
Footballguy
Miller for me12 team dynasty PPR
Team A got Lamar Miller
Team B got Eddie Lacy, Tyreek Hill
Miller for me12 team dynasty PPR
Team A got Lamar Miller
Team B got Eddie Lacy, Tyreek Hill
Winston12 team PPR dynasty
Gave: Dak & Martellus Bennett
Got: Winston & DeSean Jackson
Miller.12 team dynasty PPR
Team A got Lamar Miller
Team B got Eddie Lacy, Tyreek Hill
Crabtree.12 TEam PPR:
Gave: Maclin/Garcon
Got: Crabtree
Winston.12 team PPR dynasty
Gave: Dak & Martellus Bennett
Got: Winston & DeSean Jackson
Nice deal14 team PPR devy league
Gave:
Dalvin Cook
Got:
Nuk Hopkins, Gio Bernard
Love me some Luke but give me Dez there.10 team PPR w/ IDP (.75-assist,1.5-solo)
Team A gave:
Dez and 37th overall
Team B gave:
Kuechly and 17th overall
Team A gave:
Rob Kelly
Team B gave:
29th overall
Team B owns M. Jones
I think I like Gordon in all 3Some Melvin Gordon trades: (FFPC scoring with 1.5 ppr for TE)
Team A receives: Gordon
Team B receives: 1.4/2.3/Duke Johnson
Team A receives: Gordon/2018 1st (could be anywhere)
Team B receives: L. Miller/1.6
Team A receives: Gordon/1.11
Team B receives: L. Miller/A. Hooper/1.6
Derek12 team, start 1/2/3/1, 6pt all TDs
Team A gave: Carr
Team B gave: Prescott
Is it just me or do all of these seem super light for Gordon?Some Melvin Gordon trades: (FFPC scoring with 1.5 ppr for TE)
Team A receives: Gordon
Team B receives: 1.4/2.3/Duke Johnson
Team A receives: Gordon/2018 1st (could be anywhere)
Team B receives: L. Miller/1.6
Team A receives: Gordon/1.11
Team B receives: L. Miller/A. Hooper/1.6
Nope, not just you.Is it just me or do all of these seem super light for Gordon?
OBJ12 team dynasty PPR
Team A got OBJ, Stephan Anderson (TE Hou), pick 2.8, 2.10
Team B gets Jordan Howard, Stephan Diggs, Cameron Brate, pick 1.11
Team C got Aaron Rodgers, pick 4.11
Team D got Dak Prescott, 2018 1st (mid to late)
I think a reasonable argument can be made that Gordon could see a regression if Woodhead returns to form. Gordon had 74 rec, 611 yds, 2 rec tds. How much do you think woodhead will cut into those figures?Is it just me or do all of these seem super light for Gordon?
No, he had 41 rec for 419 yards. You are looking at his career total from his two seasons.I think a reasonable argument can be made that Gordon could see a regression if Woodhead returns to form. Gordon had 74 rec, 611 yds, 2 rec tds. How much do you think woodhead will cut into those figures?
My apologies. But woodhead could still take a big chunk of this away.No, he had 41 rec for 419 yards. You are looking at his career total from his two seasons.
Point remains the same, plus he caught zero in the one full game Woodhead played.My apologies. But woodhead could still take a big chunk of this away.
I like the side getting Yeldon,Doctson and the pick12 team dynasty PPR
Team A got TJ Yeldon, Doctson, pick 1.8, 2.11
Team B got Devante Adams, Isiaah Crowell, pick 4.1
It's not necessarily just that either. Gordon was a TD dependent, volume dependent player that has averaged 3.5 and 3.9 ypc in his two seasons in the NFL. 3.X ypc guys don't generally hold down that kind of volume for long (Eddie George excluded), especially when much of that volume came from a high number of injuries to his competition.Point remains the same, plus he caught zero in the one full game Woodhead played.
The only thing I'd say is I'm not sure Woodhead will cut into his role because I'm not sure Woodhead is going to be on the team. But people forget not only did the Chargers lose Woodhead they lost Oliver, Gordon was last man standing for a OC who prefers to run a RBBC but did not have the pieces. So maybe it's Woodhead, or maybe it's someone else, but I think someone is going to take a chunk of his workload away.
At what point do we take into consideration that the Chargers O-Line was the worst in the NFL last year?It's not necessarily just that either. Gordon was a TD dependent, volume dependent player that has averaged 3.5 and 3.9 ypc in his two seasons in the NFL. 3.X ypc guys don't generally hold down that kind of volume for long (Eddie George excluded), especially when much of that volume came from a high number of injuries to his competition.
Regression to the man is not an uncommon thing. I'm not sure I can remember a case where a guy had this many different and seemingly obvious reasons that he should regress the next season.
Right after you ignore that it was the Vikings' line.At what point do we take into consideration that the Chargers O-Line was the worst in the NFL last year?
My bad, second worst OLine, and it's not the Vikings that are the worst.Right after you ignore that it was the Vikings' line.
None. I'm just playing around.My bad, second worst OLine, and it's not the Vikings that are the worst.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-ranking-all-32-nfl-offensive-lines-this-season/
Regardless, both were atrocious so what is the point?
You might be right, just saying that it is assumed that Gordon is guaranteed to regress based on his volume and ypc. His volume will surely decline but his overall play should only get better from here out. Might not happen right away but that line can only get better.None. I'm just playing around.
But PFF is way overstating the play of Berger.
That's been said about the Chargers' line for at least five years now.You might be right, just saying that it is assumed that Gordon is guaranteed to regress based on his volume and ypc. His volume will surely decline but his overall play should only get better from here out. Might not happen right away but that line can only get better.
True story.That's been said about the Chargers' line for at least five years now.
Or the Rams lineAndy Dufresne said:Right after you ignore that it was the Vikings' line.
Reasonable argument sure, but that still puts Gordon as a top10 RB. He's young, proved he can handle a workload while playing through injuries and is still improving. Yeah people point to his YPC and TD's but whose to say he won't improve on those as well? It's not like his numbers last year were THAT bad. He did improve after his first year after all. Maybe he's a guy that's realizing what it takes to be a pro at a sport and he's put the work in, to keep improving. Either way you look at it, you can't say he's a bad RB to own and those trades were light for whatever you think Gordon is. I see it as he adapted well after a bad rookie year and is gaining his comfort in the speed of the NFL. I expect him to improve in every category other than maybe TD's.32 Counter Pass said:I think a reasonable argument can be made that Gordon could see a regression if Woodhead returns to form. Gordon had 74 rec, 611 yds, 2 rec tds. How much do you think woodhead will cut into those figures?
Went through a couple of recent RB's and Gordon's first 2 seasons looks a lot like Devonta Freeman's actually. 3.8 and 4.0 in Freeman's first 2 years with massive jumps in TD's (1 to 11). Gordon was used more as a rookie than Freeman was but their 2nd year jumps are similar. For Freeman he's another guy it's fair to question if he's in that top tier or not (I tend to say no, others might say yes), but they're both in that 2nd tier after Bell/Zeke/DJ I believe.Serious question here because I don't know the answer. What guys in recent memory have started their careers with two seasons of YPC as low as Gordon's (assuming a significant number of carries) and gone on to have a nice career?
There have been a decent handful of guys to have a poor YPC as a rookie and go on to have nice careers, but I can't really think of many that were sub 4ypc in each of their first two years and did. The most recent I can think of is Thomas Jones and that was 16 years ago now (man I'm old).
FWIW I believe this is the same argument I was making regarding Trent Richardson after his 2nd year when people still believed, though to be fair of course his YPC was much worse.
The line play would be one thing if this were a Ronnie Brown situation where he jumped off the page when he ran and you thought to yourself "wow how did that guy manage to get 2 yards on that play!". But when I watched Gordon play this year I didn't see anything remarkable about him other than him being the guy with the ball in his hands a lot.
I think if he'd been a 4th round pick in the draft we'd all be assuming he was some JAG that was soon to be replaced right now.
Maclin put up ~85/1200/9 in his last two healthy seasons. I'd gamble on him getting back to that, if doing so comes with Garcon for free.Crab easily! He's was the #1 target in Oakland last year over Cooper.
I doubt he re-signs with SD. They'll bring in some depth, but I think they like Gordon as the workhorse.32 Counter Pass said:I think a reasonable argument can be made that Gordon could see a regression if Woodhead returns to form. Gordon had 74 rec, 611 yds, 2 rec tds. How much do you think woodhead will cut into those figures?
I don't trust Alex Smith and it seemed to me that KC liked running their offense through Kelce and Tyreek. Plus, I think they want to be a running team...Maclin put up ~85/1200/9 in his last two healthy seasons. I'd gamble on him getting back to that, if doing so comes with Garcon for free.
I think that's all fair. I think it's safe to say that Crabtree is the safest asset involved. I think it's close enough, but would side with the volume here.I don't trust Alex Smith and it seemed to me that KC liked running their offense through Kelce and Tyreek. Plus, I think they want to be a running team...
Does Garçon really tip the needle at all here? I can't imagine even really factoring him into this. He'll be a 31 year old heading into an unknown destination with two career 1000 yard seasons under his belt, having never scored more than 6 TDs in a year during his career. Seems more like a roster clog than anything else.I think that's all fair. I think it's safe to say that Crabtree is the safest asset involved. I think it's close enough, but would side with the volume here.
Agreed. He's barely worth a roster spot to be honest. I realize he's coming off a decent season, but he's useless to a rebuilding team (even as trade bait) and a contender should have better options (even for depth).Does Garçon really tip the needle at all here? I can't imagine even really factoring him into this. He'll be a 31 year old heading into an unknown destination with two career 1000 yard seasons under his belt, having never scored more than 6 TDs in a year during his career. Seems more like a roster clog than anything else.
Does Garçon really tip the needle at all here? I can't imagine even really factoring him into this. He'll be a 31 year old heading into an unknown destination with two career 1000 yard seasons under his belt, having never scored more than 6 TDs in a year during his career. Seems more like a roster clog than anything else.
When talking about Crabtree--yeah, he certainly moves the needle for me. His 2016 play was more impressive than his blanket production. He was a stud last season. He finished top 10 in YAR and DYAR, top 15 in DVOA. PFF graded him as the 8th best WR in the league last year. He's only a year older than Crabtree, who also has only 2x 1,000 yard seasons in his career. I also expect the Redskins to re-sign him and let Jackson walk.Agreed. He's barely worth a roster spot to be honest. I realize he's coming off a decent season, but he's useless to a rebuilding team (even as trade bait) and a contender should have better options (even for depth).
You both might be right!When talking about Crabtree--yeah, he certainly moves the needle for me. His 2016 play was more impressive than his blanket production. He was a stud last season. He finished top 10 in YAR and DYAR, top 15 in DVOA. PFF graded him as the 8th best WR in the league last year. He's only a year older than Crabtree, who also has only 2x 1,000 yard seasons in his career. I also expect the Redskins to re-sign him and let Jackson walk.
He's a top 30 NFL WR likely to re-sign with a top 5 offense that is losing 100 targets it will need to spread around. I think he's a good bet for WR2/3 numbers over the next couple years--and I've got room on all of my rosters for that.
Edit: He has very little trade appeal and could see his value drop in FA, so I certainly understand the apprehension. I don't mean to make it sound like he's anything more than he is. But he's a guy I'm targeting and he just more than bridges the gap between Maclin and Crabtree for me.
It's actually pretty bleak when you look at it. I used 300 carries as the limit and YPC 3.9 or less for first two years and in both cases I used totals, not just one season. So any RB who first two years in the league got 300 carries and averaged 3.9 yards or less after two seasons.Serious question here because I don't know the answer. What guys in recent memory have started their careers with two seasons of YPC as low as Gordon's (assuming a significant number of carries) and gone on to have a nice career?
I moved Garçon in this deal but do like him. That said even if he does stay (I expect him to follow the money and likely not be in as good a situation as he was this year personally) his output is likely to drop and it could be significant. Reed missed a lot of time, Doctson was hurt almost all year and they had little going on throwing to RBs. I could see a lot of that changing next year. He has little trade value right now as you indicated. If I needed more depth I could understand taking the Maclin side but for me this was about raising my WR3 floor, reducing my variance and increasing overal value to my team. If I wanted a first round pick I could probably get one for Crabtree but Maclin plus Garcon? Not likely.When talking about Crabtree--yeah, he certainly moves the needle for me. His 2016 play was more impressive than his blanket production. He was a stud last season. He finished top 10 in YAR and DYAR, top 15 in DVOA. PFF graded him as the 8th best WR in the league last year. He's only a year older than Crabtree, who also has only 2x 1,000 yard seasons in his career. I also expect the Redskins to re-sign him and let Jackson walk.
He's a top 30 NFL WR likely to re-sign with a top 5 offense that is losing 100 targets it will need to spread around. I think he's a good bet for WR2/3 numbers over the next couple years--and I've got room on all of my rosters for that.
Edit: He has very little trade appeal and could see his value drop in FA, so I certainly understand the apprehension. I don't mean to make it sound like he's anything more than he is. But he's a guy I'm targeting and he just more than bridges the gap between Maclin and Crabtree for me.
Looks like a nice deal to get 2.4This isn't exactly earth shattering, but....
10-team best ball PPR
Dion Lewis, 4.05, 4.09, 5.09
for
2.04
Rather have Dion straight up over 2.4, especially in best ball.This isn't exactly earth shattering, but....
10-team best ball PPR
Dion Lewis, 4.05, 4.09, 5.09
for
2.04