I would rate Guice over 1.7 in the old vacuum but it's close and I can see why you or anyone would want out on a guy that has not even been able to play 100 snaps.FFPC
Gave - Derrius Guice
Got - 2020 1.7
I would rate Guice over 1.7 in the old vacuum but it's close and I can see why you or anyone would want out on a guy that has not even been able to play 100 snaps.FFPC
Gave - Derrius Guice
Got - 2020 1.7
An ACL tear on a non-contact run shouldn't really be held against him - those things happen.We were saying this last year. He needs to get healthy and stay healthy. Right now I consider him a bust after two years of injuries.
Yea 1.07 in a loaded class isn't really buying low.I can see this as a reason to Buy Low. I was looking to target him if such was the case.... but I am not seeing any Guice owners jumping ship.
It's actually the opposite. A non contact acl tear is a much bigger deal than one from contact; it means it's something anatomical in nature, which is unlikely to be corrected during the ACL replacement process.
Yes. I'm not very worried about his surgical knee tbhThere was much speculation making the rounds that Guice suffered damage to that ACL in his final season of college and didn't have surgery, which some teams dinged him for on his medicals, contributing to his surprising (at the time) fall. If so, that ACL may not have been in the best shape entering his rookie year. I don't know if this makes it better or worse for his value.
The MCL sprain he struggled with this season is likely a predictable result of the ACL repair, right? Compensation injuries and whatnot?
But players come back from it all the time without future issues and I’m not sure it should lead to a player being labeled “injury prone” when it’s a single occurrence.It's actually the opposite. A non contact acl tear is a much bigger deal than one from contact; it means it's something anatomical in nature, which is unlikely to be corrected during the ACL replacement process.
nice work10-team PPR
gave Ertz
got Kirk
I still have Kittle, Andrews, and Howard at TE.
I would think you could do better than Kirk for Ertz.10-team PPR
gave Ertz
got Kirk
I still have Kittle, Andrews, and Howard at TE.
I agree... would have looked for more.I would think you could do better than Kirk for Ertz.
Close for me, but the 1.02 is as high potential as Godwin and I'd gladly take Gallup over the 2.02 and 3.02. I can sure see the risk averse grabbing Godwin and being completely satisfied. A lot may come down to whether you are a strong team in your league and can coast with Godwin as a foundation piece or are in a rebuild and need the chance at a stud plus Gallup to compete.10 Team PPR
A: Gallup, Westbrook, 1.02
B: Godwin, 2.02, 3.02
1.12 easily. Johnson just looked finished even when at full strength down the stretch. There is some chance he returns to a significant role if he weren't as healthy as advertised, but I think almost none that he supplants both Drake and Edmonds into a bell cow role. And age. I'll take the first rounder in a strong RB/WR class who has a good chance of being a long term value.Team A (back to back champ) gets David Johnson
Team B (rebuilding) gets 1.12
Thanks Doc, for the opinion in line with my (uneducated but enthusiastic) feeling about the future. It wasn't long ago that people were throwing Dalvin to the dogs as 'made of glass.' Guice could still go the Kevin White route, but I think even that was ultimately a confidence and lack of talent issue more than 'injury proneness' as a career killer. I don't think Guise suffers from any lack of confidence or talent. He has already shown clear stretches of elite skills on a team with, at least yet, little competition and great other needs for their draft picks. I think Guice is far more likely to be a stud player than a 1.7, even in this strong class. I'm pretty confidently holding him everywhere.no, I wouldnt label someone injury prone based on that
That term is too loosely used by people for the wrong injury types.
I remember when Keenan Allen was considered by many to be injury prone (I recall reading FBGs calling him that too). He broke his collar bone, lacerated a kidney, and tore an acl within 2 years. That's not my definition of injury prone, and it shouldn't be anyone else's.
Guice will be unfairly labeled as injury prone, even though these 2 other knee issues are extremely likely to be related to his ACL recovery process. ACL recovery is really an 18 month process. They can return to sport at 12 but things arent back to.normal for another 6 months at least. Throw in another surgery for the meniscus and that sets him back further.
Guice is a great buy because his owner may be panicking and trying to get anything out of him that they can.
I own and have loved Ertz, but with Goedert going nowhere and cracks beginning to show in Ertz' performance (whether from shared opportunities or the beginning of the end facing 30 at a position where the beating taken often leads to early career decline) I am looking for trade opportunities. I am not a huge Kirk fan, but I think its time to get the best value you can for Zach, before a sense of production erosion becomes general.I agree... would have looked for more.
I've been trying to sell Ertz since the fantasy season ended and haven't had much luck. Not only did I feel overloaded at TE with Kittle, Ertz, Andrews, and Howard, but I also worry about Ertz starting to decline and/or Goedert stealing targets from him. I like Kirk as a player and in that offense, even if he won't ever be a WR1. Don't need him to be.according to DTC this was little short... by the value of 2.5 exactly.
Hinderly has it about the same as DTC
I think it's a pretty good return. If Fitzgerald announces his retirement today, Kirk's value balloons to that of DJ Moore last offseason.
I see this as a great buy low/sell high moment, however I dont think Kirk will be an NFL WR1, it doesnt mean he can't be a great fantasy wr. You won't be able to make this trade in 4 months...
Yeah it's too much for sure, probably by a full Sanders/Foles. Not like those are important pieces so it seems fine. I'd prefer 1 more late 2nd to even it out for you, but I still like the move.TheBottomLine said:10-team PPR.
I'm prepared to hear that I gave up too much, but I really wanted Sanders and I have a ton of draft picks and need to trim some fat to make room. So, the roster spots hold plenty of value to me.
Gave: Melvin Gordon, Emmanuel Sanders, Nick Foles, 2020 1.10
Got: Miles Sanders, 2020 2.08
I don’t think it’s too much at all. A full Foles and Emmanuel Sanders too much? Those are bit players...MG is gone, no idea what he did next and M. Sanders is a star. At this point give me Miles by a bit.Yeah it's too much for sure, probably by a full Sanders/Foles. Not like those are important pieces so it seems fine. I'd prefer 1 more late 2nd to even it out for you, but I still like the move.
I agree with this. I think Ertz has much less trade value in most leagues than a calculator would say. First because there are always owners in your league that don't value the TE position in a start one league (for strategy and team construction reasons). And then you have to factor in that basically every dynasty analyst has been recommending selling Ertz since last offseason and I'm sure the sentiment is even stronger now with the passage of another year and the emergence of Goedert. Your leaguemates will have noticed this and will likely have no interest in buying Ertz for "full value" based on production when there are younger, likely cheaper options with upside, and if you're the one selling Ertz they will be wary and won't want to pay up even if they are interested. A player at the level (and age) of Kirk to me seems like pretty much a best case scenario TBH if 2020 first rounders aren't on the table.Dr. Dan said:according to DTC this was little short... by the value of 2.5 exactly.
Hinderly has it about the same as DTC
I think it's a pretty good return. If Fitzgerald announces his retirement today, Kirk's value balloons to that of DJ Moore last offseason.
I see this as a great buy low/sell high moment, however I dont think Kirk will be an NFL WR1, it doesnt mean he can't be a great fantasy wr. You won't be able to make this trade in 4 months...
Free 3rd and 4th, and a bonus roster spot!FFPC someone actually did this, I'm rather shocked
Team A got: 2020 3rd and 4th
Team B got: Antonio Brown
I like itFFPC
I traded away: Odell Beckham Jr and Marlon Mack
I got: Joe Mixon
I still have JuJu, DJ Moore, Deebo, Metcalf 1.02, 1.10 and 2.02 as major pieces.
I don't hate OBJ but I don't think he's ever top5 consideration WR anymore. Ever. Cashing out with 2 unknowns for a beast of a RB on an ascending team with Burrow (hopefully). Mack is average'ish, some blow up weeks, good depth on an ok team. I'm shooting my shot on ceiling here.
That deal had me try to get Mixon... I offered D Freeman ATL RB & Tyler Lockett SEA WR & 2 late picks (4.11 & 4.12) for Mixon & Mercole Hardman (he has Hill, Robinson & Da Williams all KC)I traded away: Odell Beckham Jr and Marlon Mack
I got: Joe Mixon
I think if you're going after Mixon you'll need to offer a top 5+ pick in this class or an equivalent player as part of the deal. Lockett is good and he produces, but his trade value in my experience isn't as great as you'd think given where he is typically ranked (as someone who has tried to move him). Freeman is almost worth nothing now and the 4th rounders are inconsequential. To ask for Hardman as well.....I'm not surprised it was shot down immediately.That deal had me try to get Mixon... I offered D Freeman ATL RB & Tyler Lockett SEA WR & 2 late picks (4.11 & 4.12) for Mixon & Mercole Hardman (he has Hill, Robinson & Da Williams all KC)
Shot down immediately... But I like the idea of this move. Might up the picks and try again.... 2.11 is my best pick. Or include Waller
It's funny how quickly values change because I traded OBJ for Mixon and a second last offseason just before the OBJ trade to the Browns and it looked like a terrible trade at the time (and I regretted it). Now I feel like I got the better end of it.As a Mixon owner that's a pretty easy decline. you're asking for 2 really good young prospects for a rb with about 2 years left as a starter, and a wr who is pretty good but old.
It's nowhere close to OBJ and mack. Although I personally would not trade Mixon for Mack and obj...
Right. Some might even prefer Sutton who is going to be a stud.FFPC
Sutton, Courtland
Hill, Justice
2021 2nd Round
For
Henry, Derrick
Westbrook, Dede
In league but not involved other than envy\jealousy that an 11-2 team could pick up Henry so cheaply. Two owners have lodged official complaints which is pretty silly imho. Its bad but not close to must be reversed bad; right?
wht is it bad? nfl rushing leader for a studly young wrFFPC
Sutton, Courtland
Hill, Justice
2021 2nd Round
For
Henry, Derrick
Westbrook, Dede
In league but not involved other than envy\jealousy that an 11-2 team could pick up Henry so cheaply. Two owners have lodged official complaints which is pretty silly imho. Its bad but not close to must be reversed bad; right?
I think if you're going after Mixon you'll need to offer a top 5+ pick in this class or an equivalent player as part of the deal. Lockett is good and he produces, but his trade value in my experience isn't as great as you'd think given where he is typically ranked (as someone who has tried to move him). Freeman is almost worth nothing now and the 4th rounders are inconsequential. To ask for Hardman as well.....I'm not surprised it was shot down immediately.
Thanks both for the feedback. I understood it was unlikley, but I was hoping to get a counter. Maybe he likes Ingram over Freeman and only needs the 2.11 to be added.... I was just looking to find a starting point as to the availablilty or cost.my first impression reading that post was "well yeah take out Hardman and maybe..." then I realized Mixon is 23 and Freeman is 28 soon, and not nearly as good of a producer as Mixon.
I agree, would need a lot more.
It's the recency bias based on what he's done in the playoffs. Obviously he had a great season overall as well, but given his age and heavy workload I agree he's not a terrible sell high candidate. I don't see this deal as lopsided either.This is funny... DTC has Sutton for Henry in favor of Sutton...
Hinderly has a 2nd and Sutton pretty close to Henry.
Certainly not enough to file a complaint. Can't blame anyone for seeing Henry as a sell high and Sutton as a buy.
The way Henry runs, I'm not sure he has longevity in his career (but what do I know). Sutton is just starting to bud out... he has about a decade ahead of him.
I prefer Sutton, but I have an irrational hatred for Derrick Henry.FFPC
Sutton, Courtland
Hill, Justice
2021 2nd Round
For
Henry, Derrick
Westbrook, Dede
In league but not involved other than envy\jealousy that an 11-2 team could pick up Henry so cheaply. Two owners have lodged official complaints which is pretty silly imho. Its bad but not close to must be reversed bad; right?
Which side do you think got hosed?WOW... this just went thru.... 12 Team 1.5 PPR TE, 1.0 PPR RB, 0.5 PPR WR Bonus at 50 yards TE & 100 Rush/Rec RB/WR (so TE heavy league)
Team A (lost Championship and now rebuild mode) GAVE: KC TE T. Kelce & SF WR E. Sanders
Team B (competitive but injury bug bit hard 2019) GOT: NYG E Engram, 1.04 & 2.09
FYI - Team B Injuries = Cam, Guice, AJ Green, Ker Johnson (so he has potential for a competitive future)
I'd pay it for AB and I've turned down several similar type offers for him.FFPC someone actually did this, I'm rather shocked
Team A got: 2020 3rd and 4th
Team B got: Antonio Brown
WOW... this just went thru.... 12 Team 1.5 PPR TE, 1.0 PPR RB, 0.5 PPR WR Bonus at 50 yards TE & 100 Rush/Rec RB/WR (so TE heavy league)
Team A (lost Championship and now rebuild mode) GAVE: KC TE T. Kelce & SF WR E. Sanders
Team B (competitive but injury bug bit hard 2019) GOT: NYG E Engram, 1.04 & 2.09
I think he sold Kelce short, not hosed but missed on other value. Engram 2020 is in final year of contract and I do not trust Gettleman. I am not a fan of Engram due to injury history (34 of 48 games played last 3 seasons) I don't think they will resign him and uncertain future.Which side do you think got hosed?
Thanks for answering and based on how people feel about Engram I thought that was way you probably felt.I think he sold Kelce short, not hosed but missed on other value. Engram 2020 is in final year of contract and I do not trust Gettleman. I am not a fan of Engram due to injury history (34 of 48 games played last 3 seasons) I don't think they will resign him and uncertain future.
Kelce has missed 1 game in last 5 season & signed thru 2021... Granted Kelce is 30 & Engram is 25 yo...
I see Kelce as a Sell High... this was not high IMO
Errrrrrr I'm going to say Team B by an entire Kelce, Sanders, Engram, 1.04 and 2.09. Holy cow. This is like that heads I win tails you lose scenario. Love it. I can never get this one to work, though.WOW... this just went thru.... 12 Team 1.5 PPR TE, 1.0 PPR RB, 0.5 PPR WR Bonus at 50 yards TE & 100 Rush/Rec RB/WR (so TE heavy league)
Team A (lost Championship and now rebuild mode) ***GAVE***: KC TE T. Kelce & SF WR E. Sanders
Team B (competitive but injury bug bit hard 2019) ***GOT***: NYG E Engram, 1.04 & 2.09
FYI - Team B Injuries = Cam, Guice, AJ Green, Ker Johnson (so he has potential for a competitive future)
I would much rather have Henry over Sutton, particularly in that lg where i have thomas,evans,allen,kupp,mclaurin,gallup and desperate for rb. Many of my tms r wr heavy and my feeling is there r lot more young promising wrs than solid rbs. As has been pointed out there is a lot of love for Sutton and i did call out the protests as silly so not pounding the table over it.wht is it bad? nfl rushing leader for a studly young wr
Why would anyone give that for Noah Fant?FFPC
Gave - Noah Fant
Got - 1.05 and John Ross
Yikes. Even in TE Premium that seems like an extreme overpay.FFPC
Gave - Noah Fant
Got - 1.05 and John Ross
I'm not in any TE premium leagues but did he even get drafted before or at 1.05 last offseason in such leagues? It's hard to imagine one could turn a profit on him.Why would anyone give that for Noah Fant?
he went between around 1.08 and 2.02 in mine.I'm not in any TE premium leagues but did he even get drafted before or at 1.05 last offseason in such leagues? It's hard to imagine one could turn a profit on him.
the only thing I'd argue here is that TE's usually take longer so usually worth more in year 2 or 3 then as a rookie. Fant flashed enough that we are pretty positive he'll be good. I didn't think it was that far off but I sold him as I like the top half of rd1 in this draft. In several of my FFPC league he went 1.4-1.7 last yearhe went between around 1.08 and 2.02 in mine.
The furthest I would fall giving up the 1.01 is 1.06. Also, I wouldn't have given two 2nd rd picks to move down to 1.06. The most I would have considered is the 1.01 and one 2021 2nd for the 1.06 and two 2021 1st rd picks. I wouldn't even do that for the 1.07. I would want one of Swift, Dobbins, Etienne, Jeudy, Lamb, or Taylor.12 team PPR Superflex
Team A gives:
2020 1.01
2021 2nd
2021 2nd
Team B gives:
2020 1.07
2021 1st
2021 1st
I agree with your overall point but every year a RB or WR that no one is hyping yet goes to a prime location and gets “overdrafted” so one or two of those guys will likely drop to 1.07.The furthest I would fall giving up the 1.01 is 1.06. Also, I wouldn't have given two 2nd rd picks to move down to 1.06. The most I would have considered is the 1.01 and one 2021 2nd for the 1.06 and two 2021 1st rd picks. I wouldn't even do that for the 1.07. I would want one of Swift, Dobbins, Etienne, Jeudy, Lamb, or Taylor.
Regardless, I wouldn't have given two 2nd rd picks in the deal, just one, even if I was willing to get the 1.07 instead of it being the 1.06. Not to mention that one or two of those players I listed in my top 6 could end up in a crappy situation.I agree with your overall point but every year a RB or WR that no one is hyping yet goes to a prime location and gets “overdrafted” so one or two of those guys will likely drop to 1.07.