Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I'd say Hooper for 12 if you need a TE is fine even though I expect his value to be significantly worse in Cle as it was in ATL. I love the Russ trade. I'd pay an aging Big Ben off of an injury and late picks for DangeRuss.
I agree with everything you say here but nearly spit out my water when I read “20 td upside.”
I think this was a great deal for you. I'm not sold on D-Hop's value in AZ (he will be good but just a step down from where he was). 2 and 6 could get you Taylor or Swift and Lemb or Jeudy. Good move. I traded Nuke this offseason too on the day of their trade.
That is a hell of a team.12 team PPR dynasty. I think I have the best roster I've ever had in any league, in 20+ years of doing this. I have some stinkers too, but this one has just become a super power
Gave: JuJu and Gallup
Got: M Thomas and 3.8 Pick.
Update roster where we start 1qb, 2rb, 3wr, 1te, 1 reg flex
Mahomes, Jones, T. Hill
Zeke, Chubb, Jacobs, Lindsay, Henderson, Edmonds
Thomas, Hopkins, Hill, Evans, Hollywood Brown, Hardman, Preston Williams
Kelce, Engram
Picks 1.3, 3.8, 3.11
I'll have a tough time deciding which player to sit out of those bolded each week. Wonderful problem to have yes I know.
I take D-Hop, Evans, and Ertz in a landslide. Kupp can't stay healthy & LA's offense could struggle without Gurley, I like DK/Calvin but not even close to D-Hop/Evans, Guice can't stay on the field, and they didn't even get a 1st back in the deal. This is an easy one for me.Bazinga! said:
The Evans owner got robbed here. Johnson isn't going to be a monster and those picks aren't high enough.
Yeah seriously I'm taking an inventory immediately on other Evans owners in my leagues.
I was doing the same. I'm about to look at rosters and see what I can find. Not sure about 20 TDs but if anyone is selling him at any discount at all, I'll take it.
I don’t get why someone would spend a first round pick on a player and then sell for a loss before he gets his chance (And when his team went out of their way to give him his chance).
Qbs being easier to come by in this format, give me the better of the other asset, so 1.09
1.02 for same reason as above
jacobs by a lot a lot
Rodgers side but close
1.10
pretty fair, give me deebo tho
green side
brees side
Ok - that's an outlier. I still think it's selling low but makes a little more sense with that added info.
I agree, but in my leagues no one seems interested in him. I have offered him up for what I have seen him go for and the usual response is not interested in him. We have shallow starting requirements, but I have been targeting WR needy teams. FBG seems higher on him than the reality in my leagues.
I'd say Henderson by a mile. No reason to sell on him now unless you get a good haul. I think I take 1.5 too but roster makeup would matter in this deal.
No way I put my faith in Goff and Ingram is up there in age for RBs and will lost touches to Hill. I take TB12 and the best asset in this trade at 1.09.
I think this one is pretty close. That is a big haul for 1.02 but I think I'd want to wait until the draft when we know where people are going as well as let the draft fever hit people for bigger offers. I like 1.02 here but could see the argument for the Murray/Mack side of things.
This is Jacobs by a mile. TE premium would help the other side but Henry will lose value with Rivers gone, Conner is about to be a memory in my opinion, and had to give up 2.9 to get 3.2. This is close to robbery.
I love me some Kamara and Allen is definitely under rated but Amari will have a longer prime, A-Rod isn't close to done yet, and you should be able to get talent still at 1.10 so I'd take the Cooper side but it isn't by a lot.
I'd say Deebo by a long shot here. Smith/Hurts is close and I don't think you find a Deebo talent at 1.7. Hide yo chains.
I'm not a huge fan of either side here but I could see the upside at 1.13 due to SF. AJ Green can't stay on the field so I could see wanting to get out from under him.
Henderson generated next to no buzz in camp last year, could not pass Malcolm Brown on the depth chart. That worries me even though Henderson did look good in his very limited chances. But I'd lean on the two seconds in what I believe are both deep drafts.
Drake is 26 but with little wear and tear is going in round one of a lot of redrafts I've seen and I only have to move back 8 spots. Seems like I should prefer Drake side, might after the NFL draft, but right now I probably can't up a shot at one of the big 5 RB's/Lamb/Juedy. But this is close and if I'm competing now and need a RB I would be swayed.
1.9
1.2 but don't hate it for what 1.2 is getting to give it up.
Jacobs
Kamara
1.10
1.7 and Hurst by a ton
Gallup and IMO the most lopsided trade you posted.
Chubb's a great runner, arguably the best in the NFL. But Hunt's figures to crimp his passing game usage a year, lower his upside and then he's 26. Chubb seems like he just got here but when he enters that second contract at age 27 he's already going to get some age devaluation by many in fantasy. Moore might be better in the present, but the odds of him being great for a significantly longer stretch then Chubb are huge. I'd take Moore in a vacuum, especially with you indicating you have 3 RB's you like more.
You've outlined my thought process exactly, we're on the same page. And going 4 RB1's every week has won me multiple championships so it wasn't easy, but I just see too much downside in Chubb becoming a guy who needs a TD to not piss you off every week. Whereas I can see Moore as a 100+ catch guy and he's 22.
I'm in some that are dead as could be and it's frustrating in general but also those are leagues I tend to make my worst trades because only way I can get someone to do something is overpay.I wish I was in leagues that make trades. My Zealots leagues are boring in comparison.
Pretty even deal. 100 RECs is bullish on Moore. Doubt Bridgewater is that pass-heavy and surrounding weapons will make ceiling of usage the question with Moore.
I'll try out Davis for that price.
JuJu side
Not a Guide believer. I'll take KJ.
1.03 bigly
Smith
Seems to be a common refrain regarding Zealots leagues. I only have one league with quite a few trades and that's mainly one guy that trades players for draft picks throughout the season and then trades his draft picks for players leading up to the draft. I think he's addicted to trading.I wish I was in leagues that make trades. My Zealots leagues are boring in comparison.
I agree with the overall assessment but not because of the bolded. Hill was a non-factor last season - and was behind and UDFA in Edwards. Not sure why that changes this year.
Yep. The only way to make them is to give up way too much. I can empathize. My main league is now dead with new owners coming in and not dealing. My new league is one where I'm still getting the lay of the land. I traded in this thread earlier and gave too much to get the deal done, but I stand by it.
