The Z Machine
Footballguy
I've visited CMU once and went to Georgia Tech for graduate school. I'm not a huge Georgia Tech undergrad booster. I think their quality of life isn't great. The male/female ratio is still pretty whack, and the fraternities are too "southern" for my taste. Those frats tend to dominate a lot of the social scene, which is also not my preference. Grad school is a whole 'nother ball of wax though, and since grad students are over 21, the Atlanta nightlife scene offers a lot for anyone.There seem to be some people knowledgeable of engineering here, so maybe I can gather some info to help my daughter make her decision. Looks like she will be deciding between Rice, Carnegie Mellon, GA Tech and Illinois.
Just looking at things like US news rankings, Rice is listed higher up on the "national university" rankings, while below the other three on the engineering-specific rankings. Then when looking at specific majors she is considering, CMU is ranked highest for computer engineering, while GA Tech is ranked highest for aerospace engineering.
But putting aside rankings, and putting aside cost and location - what are some other pluses/minuses for these schools that can help one make a decision? Are any of these clearly better or worse than the other?
I think some things that are very important to my daughter are being around students who are smart, working under teachers that she can respect, getting good opportunities for summer internships and jobs upon graduation, and being in a collaborative environment where everyone tries to bring each other up (as opposed to a cutthroat environment where each kid is looking out for themselves). Does one of these schools fit that profile better than another?
CMU is a beautiful campus, right in Pittsburgh, so similar in the campus situation. From my recollection, the social scene is better there, less dominated by frats. I think the lack of big time college sports can be a plus or minus depending on one's disposition.
Overall, the education received at both will be good to excellent. Both make good quality engineers with lots of potential for grad work if desired. CMU might be better for training for grad school and GT might be better for training to go directly into the workforce, but it's splitting hairs a bit.