Yep told you this was your answer hours ago.I said:
That isn’t the same as saying the vaccines haven’t harmed anyone.
That study says nothing about unvaccinated people who have had COVID, which is the point you say it backs you up on.
To find out, the researchers looked to over 4.7 million fully vaccinated Israeli adults
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02516-4That study says nothing about unvaccinated people who have had COVID, which is the point you say it backs you up on.
Disagree. Delta is more contagious and at least as deadly as the variants that preceded it. Omicron could go either way.There's some very early evidence that omicron is out-competing delta in the UK. Obviously if that is the case in the UK, it will be the same elsewhere. That's not necessarily terrible news since we don't know much or really anything at all about the virulence of omicron, but delta was a fairly "nice" variant to have as the dominant strain so anything that dethrones delta is probably not going to work to our benefit.
You are a professional correct? Let's friend on LinkedIn.Disagree. Delta is more contagious and at least as deadly as the variants that preceded it. Omicron could go either way.
I'm known, don't who the heck you are.Disagree. Delta is more contagious and at least as deadly as the variants that preceded it. Omicron could go either way.
Here's what it says.https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02516-4That study says nothing about unvaccinated people who have had COVID, which is the point you say it backs you up on.
Have fun. Full study link there.
That study says nothing about unvaccinated people who have had COVID, which is the point you say it backs you up on. Apparently you don't even know what your links say.Older Israelis who have received a third dose of a COVID-19 vaccine are much less likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 or to develop severe COVID-19 than are those who have had only two jabs
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-study-covid-booster-shots-92-effective-at-preventing-serious-illness/Here's what it says.
That study says nothing about unvaccinated people who have had COVID, which is the point you say it backs you up on. Apparently you don't even know what your links say.
It says
That study says nothing about unvaccinated people who have had COVID, which is the point you say it backs you up on.COVID booster shots 92% effective at preventing serious illness
So you have a list of links you throw out, like tomatoes against a wall, even though you don't know what they say.
Its insane. I can get links that talk about the study but can't get it.So you have a list of links you throw out, like tomatoes against a wall, even though you don't know what they say.
Congrats on your list.
It's such odd schtick to make an unvaccinated study argument, and repeatedly post articles that don't use the word "unvaccinated."
It is, for some NAATs, but usually the test results aren’t given with enough detail to recognize the difference. Typically, it’s “positive” or negative”.The problem with this is I think Omicron has a fairly distinct / atypical PCR result, if I'm reading things correctly
This is not about the article. Just me. Is there a difference between unvaccinated and had covid unvaccinated,It's such odd schtick to make an unvaccinated study argument, and repeatedly post articles that don't use the word "unvaccinated."
26 Aug 2021
That last article you posted concludes:This is not about the article. Just me. Is there a difference between unvaccinated and had covid unvaccinated,
Do you accept that finding? Agree it favors vaccinating for previously infected?The researchers also found that people who had SARS-CoV-2 previously and received one dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine were more highly protected against reinfection than those who once had the virus and were still unvaccinated.
well, then, clearly you are superimmune. Uless you catch it again, then you’d be… sickI had covid, I have been around no less than 20 people that I was in meetings rooms with and they tested positive. Not once. Did I get sick.
This has been posted repeatedly here and ignored and yet we do the same unproductive circle dance every couple weeks and people continue to jump on board and engage.That last article you posted concludes:
Do you accept that finding? Agree it favors vaccinating for previously infected?
That is an LHUCKSian pulling of a number out of one's backside.belljr said:160 million people caught covid in the US?
Kids 5 an under can't get vaxxedLeeroy Jenkins said:Get your kids vaccinated. Get your “booster” (which is really shot 3 in the prime)
belljr said:160 million people caught covid in the US?
That is an LHUCKSian pulling of a number out of one's backside.
I know ALOT more people (dozens) who have been vaccinated and gotten covid than people who have been reinfected (0)fatness said:My oldest son believes what you believe. He's had COVID once, in April 2020, and is currently waiting on the results from his test yesterday to see if he has it again. I personally know people who are not vaccinated who have had COVID twice.
Prior COVID-19 infection does not protect as well as vaccine against reinfection: CDCAlso, does the first covid infection prevent hospitalization for the 2nd? In other words, does natural immunity act like the vax?
Patients hospitalized with COVID-like symptoms were five times more likely to test positive for Sars-Cov-2, if they were unvaccinated and had a prior history of having COVID-19, compared to those who received the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine and had no history of coronavirus infection, according to a report last week by the CDC.
Kids 5 an under can't get vaxxed
They still don't know if the vax protects against omicron
2 strikes. One more and you're out
Well then I'll throw a my bad. The worldometers had it at like 60. I appreciate the the civil responseSorry, if it's been posted - I'm sort of scrolling past a lot of these. That number is from the CDC. They estimated that the actual number of cases in the US are in that ball park due to under reporting.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burden.html
How do you know?The vaccine isn't going to be 0% effective. And if they are above 70% that is still amazing and where the original target was anyway.
I'm talking about hospitalization not reinfection.
How do you know?
DamnHot off the press from Your Local Epidemiologist....
I'll be honest, I had thought thus far that Omicron was going to be a nothing burger. Wishful thinking I guess. But this concerns me a bit.
Omicron Update: Dec 4 (YLE)
- This (South Africa data over the pandemic and including up through 11/27/21) is the first evidence to show us that the rate of reinfection with Omicron is high—3 times higher than Delta. In other words, infection-induced immunity is not doing a great job at stopping Omicron.
- US is seeing case growth across the nation with 94,926 new cases per day. Hot spots are clustered in the Northern states who were largely untouched by Delta during the summer, but all geographic areas in the United States are increasing.
- Not nearly enough people are fully protected going into the Winter months. Only 59.7% of the United States is fully vaccinated (which the CDC defines as not having a booster, which really needs to change). Only 22% of 18+ are boosted and, even more concerning, only 46% of those aged 65+.
I don't know. That last link I gave you was a study of hospitalized patients, patients that lived. There have been multiple links posted showing unvaccinated people are far more likely to be hospitalized. Perhaps you could look up the answer you're seeking.Someone unvaxxed but previously infected can also get covid at a higher rate than the above person (according to the article above) but what are their chances of being hospitalized compared to the first person.
I literally just read something about the scientific debate on this. Another hypothesis is this is not a delta variant "child" but mutated (branched off much earlier) from an immunecompromised hostAnd now Omicron may have incorporated some genetic sequencing from the "common cold" which was encountered when in common cells. Which could be why it transmits easier . . . .
One interview I heard speculated that South Africa being the epicenter may indicate the mutation could be due to a co-infection with HIV because SA has a high incidence of undiagnosed cases.I literally just read something about the scientific debate on this. Another hypothesis is this is not a delta variant "child" but mutated (branched off much earlier) from an immunecompromised host
I thought Delta transmitted like chicken pox which is much more infectious than the common cold.And now Omicron may have incorporated some genetic sequencing from the "common cold" which was encountered when in common cells. Which could be why it transmits easier . . . .
I think hospitalizations are indeed up in South Africa.The early results seem to be checking all the boxes of concern - spreading wildly, evading natural and vaccine immunity and affecting younger kids. The biggest piece is severity. High cases that don’t result in hospitalizations and deaths negate much of the other concerns. In the next couple weeks we will see if these huge case jumps in SA result in surging hospitalizations. We’re also 7-10 days away from getting data from the vaccine manufactures on how resistant the variant is.
Those are the two most important things to watch in the next two weeks and will determined how screwed we are.
I thought Delta transmitted like chicken pox which is much more infectious than the common cold.
Probably not. IIRC the CDC #s peg it at around half the country.That is an LHUCKSian pulling of a number out of one's backside.