A single person ending up owning everything is the exact opposite of the trend in capitalism. In capitalism, the median person achieves greater wealth over time. In your version of it, the median person ends up with literally nothing. It's not obvious that your version is more correct than what's been observed so far.I guess I thought it was a pretty safe assumption. If you have 10 teams and they keep playing games where the loser goes out of business, eventually there will only be one team left right? At least that's how it seems to me theoretically.