If you are being serious - this is an odd place to make that request.Guys, what are the defining characteristics of guys that do drive-by shootings and never get caught?
I'd like a study proving that, please.
I think most logical, fair minded people would conclude that illegal immigrants do vote. The question is, how many?Thats actually an interesting paper.
But, it does not support your conclusion that: "There have been studies showing that illegals do vote - today."
"It is possible that some respondents were without any documentation whatsoever (popularly called “illegal aliens”), though this cannot be confirmed or rejected with the information available as no respondent specifically self-identified themselves as illegal or undocumented (but many did not specifically identify themselves as having permanent resident status)."
Also of note: "Our results also suggest that photo-identification requirements are unlikely to be effective
at preventing electoral participation by non-citizen immigrants: In 2008, more than two thirds of
non-citizen immigrants who indicated that they were asked to show photo-identification reported that they went on to cast a vote."
Not necessarily. A lot of my smaller accounts (indian owned) are really against illegal immigration. They went thru the proper channels and did it legally.But it has to be more than just a legal/illegal distinction, right? Because otherwise, we could just decide to have open borders and then all immigration would be legal.
Would you be an illegal driver if you were 12 years old had no license, insurance and was drunk?But it has to be more than just a legal/illegal distinction, right? Because otherwise, we could just decide to have open borders and then all immigration would be legal.
I disagree wholeheartedly. I think any fair-minded person who put any thought into this would agree that undocumented immigrants are unlikely to vote in an election.I think most logical, fair minded people would conclude that illegal immigrants do vote.
No idea where you got this number. Most studies estimate 10-12 million:There are anywhere from 19-31 million of them here.
Guys, let me rephrase. I'd like to have a pollster find out why people aren't answering pollsters honestly. When do you think the best time to call them would be?If you are being serious - this is an odd place to make that request.
I don’t think I made my point clear. My point is that simply stating that you are against illegal immigration and support legal immigration is sort of meaningless. The more relevant inquiry is what sort of legal immigration do you support? Because the government could decide to grant amnesty to everyone presenting themselves at the Southern border and that would then be legal immigration. Surely those who are concerned about illegal immigration wouldn’t suddenly be in support of now legal immigrants flowing across the border at will.Not necessarily. A lot of my smaller accounts (indian owned) are really against illegal immigration. They went thru the proper channels and did it legally.
I sense your frustration at being unable to support your position.Does anybody have a link to Grandma's special recipe that she never shares with anybody?
I think a link to the ingredients would prove its existence. Thanks.
sinn,If you are being serious - this is an odd place to make that request.
I have no position nor did I take one. You're asking for a near impossibility: The proof of the existence of that which is more than inclined and encouraged to keep its very existence secret.I sense your frustration at being unable to support your position.
I find that reasonable - i.e. I believe the story/numbers.sinn,
question for you as you seem to have a grip. 2 years ago my brother in law went to the emergency room in the Phoenix area -broken arm-7:00 PM & waited for 2 hours. Nurse told him the previous `14 out of 20 patients were all undocumented, no insurance.
your take?
That's simply an immediate economic cost-benefit analysis of one piece of the puzzle that can't even be answered. There are other questions when considering the homogenous nature of groups and outsiders and the attendant costs that aren't so immediate regarding the majority culture absorbing those whose cultures differ in structure and in action. This we see in crime rates, administration of rights and responsibilities, schooling, political changes, and other things that aren't necessarily measured by immediate economic measures but that play a role in a generalized notion of what costs or benefits are.But, the real question that can't be answered here - are those undocumented people providing some economic benefit to the country (via a US business that employs them in some capacity). My sense is that most (but not all) undocumented people are here to work, and generally in jobs that citizens have shunned. So - is that economic cost, offset by the economic benefit? I honestly don't know - but that is where the conversation should be centered.
The original comment was "studies show that illegal immigrants are voting - today"I have no position nor did I take one. You're asking for a near impossibility: The proof of the existence of that which is more than inclined and encouraged to keep its very existence secret.
There's a fatal flaw in both the assertion of the truth of the existence of a thing by proof or reason and the asking for proof of that assertion of existence by study or empirical data. It sort of takes chutzpah to ask, and it's a fool's errand to go chasing around for the information.
The only thing to say is that we know it exists from experience or we know it exists because the probability overwhelmingly suggests its existence. Your proof won't be forthcoming anytime soon.
I think you’re making my point, but I’m not sure. As I said in my previous post, the question isn’t so much about supporting “legal immigration” as it is what type of legal immigration do you support?Would you be an illegal driver if you were 12 years old had no license, insurance and was drunk?
If you removed all driving restrictions than the 12 year old would be legal.
You could solve the murder problem by making it legal to go around killing people.
Edit,
Again it's all about controlling the langue, so you can control the behavior of other people.
I'll admit, I'd like to see those. If so, that's good work, because that seems like a very difficult thing to prove or chase down.The original comment was "studies show that illegal immigrants are voting - today"
Your answer assumes a lot - but specifically that these immigrants are bringing in a culture that does not already exist.That's simply an immediate economic cost-benefit analysis of one piece of the puzzle that can't even be answered. There are other questions when considering the homogenous nature of groups and outsiders and the attendant costs that aren't so immediate regarding the majority culture absorbing those whose cultures differ in structure and in action. This we see in crime rates, administration of rights and responsibilities, schooling, political changes, and other things that aren't necessarily measured by immediate economic measures but that play a role in a generalized notion of what costs or benefits are.
In America, they are. The Mexican and South and Central Americas have language as an immediate cultural difference for, I'd guess, at least ninety percent of them. That could be overestimating, but I think anyone would grant that our current immigration/border issue revolves around people of that descent with that language issue. To not assume cultural differences between South of the border and the United States would seem to be a pie-in-the-sky notion, and really a contentious point if made to the contrary.Your answer assumes a lot - but specifically that these immigrants are bringing in a culture that does not already exist.
Someone got free healthcare?sinn,
question for you as you seem to have a grip. 2 years ago my brother in law went to the emergency room in the Phoenix area -broken arm-7:00 PM & waited for 2 hours. Nurse told him the previous `14 out of 20 patients were all undocumented, no insurance.
your take?
I am in Lexington Ky - there is a large Hispanic population mostly revolving around the horse industry. There is a part of town here where you don't need to speak English - for anything - and, in fact, you might need a bit of Spanish to conduct business. It is primarily Mexican, but there are other cultures represented in the area.In America, they are. The Mexican and South and Central Americas have language as an immediate cultural difference for, I'd guess, at least ninety percent of them. That could be overestimating, but I think anyone would grant that our current immigration/border issue revolves around people of that descent with that language issue. To not assume cultural differences between South of the border and the United States would seem to be a pie-in-the-sky notion, and really a contentious point if made to the contrary.
If one were to set about quantifying the cost of these things, then it would be useful to itemize and put forth each individual difference for debate, but it seems like we can skip that part of the debate and advance to Go, really.
So when conducting official government or private business, the cost of administering aid, benefits, translation from English, or other such things to native Spanish speakers is something to consider when one considers costs both economic and non-economic, right?I am in Lexington Ky - there is a large Hispanic population mostly revolving around the horse industry. There is a part of town here where you don't need to speak English - for anything - and, in fact, you might need a bit of Spanish to conduct business. It is primarily Mexican, but there are other cultures represented in the area.
We are in the middle (so-to-speak) of the country. That culture exists in every major city, and probably every city near the southern border.
I’ll leave it to the Board to decide who is making little sense here. 10-12 million is a pipe dream. Not even close.No idea where you got this number. Most studies estimate 10-12 million:
https://www.brookings.edu/policy2020/votervital/how-many-undocumented-immigrants-are-in-the-united-states-and-who-are-they/
the rest of your post made very little sense as well.
So when conducting official government or private business, the cost of administering aid, benefits, translation from English, or other such things to native Spanish speakers is something to consider when one considers costs both economic and non-economic, right?
There is no seamless interaction here between any sort of private or official business, no?
At first maybe. But after a while they catch on. We've seen them literally openly march and demonstrate for their "rights".I disagree wholeheartedly. I think any fair-minded person who put any thought into this would agree that undocumented immigrants are unlikely to vote in an election.
You cut off my quote to make it look like I was saying that all illegals vote. I merely said that they do vote but that the degree and magnitude was in question. Let’s agree that the numbers will never be known. One, because Liberals won’t ever dare do a study on it. And two, few if any Conservative groups will do a study because today’s climate is too toxic.I disagree wholeheartedly. I think any fair-minded person who put any thought into this would agree that undocumented immigrants are unlikely to vote in an election.
Undocumented aliens are extremely unlikely to go to a Government building to register to vote, where they would have to provide documentation - that they don't have, and risk being caught for not having said documentation and deported. Then, they would be extremely unlikely to show up at a polling station, where they like have to provide some form of ID, and hope the government did not figure out they were undocumented when they registered to vote.
The non-citizens who do vote are documented residents - whether here on a student visa, work visa, or green card, or other status where they think they are entitled to vote.
Btw - I agree with your hypothesis. I don’t think the number is substantial. But it’s not zero, which is the blanket statement that I was responding to.The original comment was "studies show that illegal immigrants are voting - today"
If you are telling me those studies don't exist - then I believe you.
I really like to read and learn all kinds of things. My hypothesis - as laid out here several times - is that undocumented people are extremely unlikely to risk deportation and/or jail by going to a government building to register to vote - where they will be asked for documents they don't have.
I believe that undocumented people are very resourceful - and are not above fudging some documentation to get work, or lodging , etc. But, I don't see them making that same effort to vote in an election - there simply is not the upside for a single vote - even if they thought all of their compatriots were voting with them.
Yeah I was clearly referring to a little more important elections than school board or municipal. Because that’s what I thought you were referring to as well.ekbeats said:Tim also said that no illegals vote, which was also disproved. San Fran and at least 10 other municipalities allow for illegals to vote in local elections.
This isn’t a matter of opinion for members of the board to decide. There’s an actual number: studies suggest 10-12 million. You don’t get to ignore information that doesn’t go your way. That’s the whole point of my thread about the MSM.ekbeats said:I’ll leave it to the Board to decide who is making little sense here. 10-12 million is a pipe dream. Not even close.
You’re so cocksure aren’t you.This isn’t a matter of opinion for members of the board to decide. There’s an actual number: studies suggest 10-12 million. You don’t get to ignore information that doesn’t go your way. That’s the whole point of my thread about the MSM.
Well, at least you admitted you were wrong, which is a start.Yeah I was clearly referring to a little more important elections than school board or municipal. Because that’s what I thought you were referring to as well.
I wasn’t aware of the school board/municipal stuff. But now that I am, I don’t care.
We’re never going to know for sure until we give them legal status and make them part of the Census.You’re so cocksure aren’t you.
Yale, MIT study: 22 million, not 11 million, undocumented immigrants in US
Drivers licenses are a damn good idea- that way they get insurance and our roads are safer. And the ones who break the laws are easier to catch.By the way - 16 states plus DC have laws on the books to allow unauthorized immigrants to obtain a driver's licenses. Often times that is all that is required to vote. Years ago in PA automatic voter registration cards were sent out out to illegal aliens who had obtained drivers licenses, causing all sorts of confusion. If you guys think there are foolproof measures in place preventing illegal aliens from voting you’re sorely mistaken.
That’s actually a good point by you.Drivers licenses are a damn good idea- that way they get insurance and our roads are safer. And the ones who break the laws are easier to catch.
It always amazes me how one side of this argument claim to be on the side of a “lawful society”, and yet they do everything they can to keep these poor people in the shadows, which makes us all far less safe.
Wow. You deflected quick!We’re never going to know for sure until we give them legal status and make them part of the Census.
I think we should be able to control our border, no? Shouldn't we know who is in our country at all times - as much as we can anyway? If Biden wanted to reward them by making all illegals legal, I wouldn't like it but I can't change it.bigbottom said:I don’t think I made my point clear. My point is that simply stating that you are against illegal immigration and support legal immigration is sort of meaningless. The more relevant inquiry is what sort of legal immigration do you support? Because the government could decide to grant amnesty to everyone presenting themselves at the Southern border and that would then be legal immigration. Surely those who are concerned about illegal immigration wouldn’t suddenly be in support of now legal immigrants flowing across the border at will.
Handing out citizenship would remove them from being undocumented and would not differentiate between those who came legally and those who broke the law to get here.We’re never going to know for sure until we give them legal status and make them part of the Census.
Attempting to identify them without giving them any kind of legal status (nobody is in favor of “handing out citizenship; it has to be a process) would be a form of persecution, which was the whole intent.Handing out citizenship would remove them from being undocumented and would not differentiate between those who came legally and those who broke the law to get here.
How would that help us determine how many are "illegal aliens"?
.How about....allowing a new census question to help identify how many non-citizens there are in the United States. And where they are. (The questions on citizenship were abandoned after 1950).
Anyone ever think of that??
Oh yeah...someone did.
No deflection at all. I gave you a study that says 10-12 million. You offered a study that says more. Based on what I have seen, the one you offered was an outlier, because several studies I’ve seen have suggested the lower number. But again, we’ll never know for sure until we give them legal status.Wow. You deflected quick!
These are two separate questions. I find it disgusting that we play this game of having laws regarding immigration and, for decades, have refused to enforce them. And I don't mean just the border. Ronald Reagan got amnesty passed based upon the promises of closing the border and going after employers of illegal immigrants. We were told this would take care of the problem forever. So we legalized millions of illegal immigrants and then didn't do either of the things promised to end the problem altogether.bigbottom said:I don’t think I made my point clear. My point is that simply stating that you are against illegal immigration and support legal immigration is sort of meaningless. The more relevant inquiry is what sort of legal immigration do you support? Because the government could decide to grant amnesty to everyone presenting themselves at the Southern border and that would then be legal immigration. Surely those who are concerned about illegal immigration wouldn’t suddenly be in support of now legal immigrants flowing across the border at will.
Thanks for the context. Employer who takes advantage of a class of workers by paying sub-standard wages and passes it off as convenience. Then in the same breath will fight for an increase in minimum wage knowing that it won't affect him since he "pays for the job". True POS.So far from union wages.
Ok...
I wholeheartedly object to this line of thinking.But, the real question that can't be answered here - are those undocumented people providing some economic benefit to the country (via a US business that employs them in some capacity). My sense is that most (but not all) undocumented people are here to work, and generally in jobs that citizens have shunned. So - is that economic cost, offset by the economic benefit? I honestly don't know - but that is where the conversation should be centered.
No idea where you got this number. Most studies estimate 10-12 million:
https://www.brookings.edu/policy2020/votervital/how-many-undocumented-immigrants-are-in-the-united-states-and-who-are-they/
the rest of your post made very little sense as well.
This isn’t a matter of opinion for members of the board to decide. There’s an actual number: studies suggest 10-12 million. You don’t get to ignore information that doesn’t go your way. That’s the whole point of my thread about the MSM.
Wth man?We’re never going to know for sure until we give them legal status and make them part of the Census.
If the profits go down, that means the prices don't go up. If the prices go up, then the profits won't go down.You are definitely one of the few conservatives who are in favor of higher wages, lower profits, and higher product prices!
You could have saved yourself a lot of circular typing by just saying: “I agree”If the profits go down, that means the prices don't go up. If the prices go up, then the profits won't go down.
Realistically, the wages would go up, profits would take a portion of the hit and prices would take the other portion up.