Had him picked for many iterations. Kicking myself pretty hard for thinking in the end "I won't need Denard, let's go with Fitzgerald and Brown at WR, early bye week, Fitz will bounce back and Brown mitigates some risk".Down to at least 40 Denard owners left. This one is out with 129.9. So close and TE trio of Graham/Eifert/Wright got me a goose. Earliest exit ever.The 41 of us Denard Robinson owners are liking what's going on with him
Enjoy it while it lasts, good luck.
can no longer access the o.ffense site at work, but how many Bailey owners are still alive? I took him in large part hoping he'd provide an edge later in the year with a low population of owners.Julio Jones and Steve Smith have counted every week thus far. Stedman Bailey hasn't yet. Still alive despite almost zero rb points for 5 weeks running
Man, that REALLY sucks.This guy was knocked out when Roethlisberger took those kneel downs
http://subscribers.footballguys.com/contest/2014/112498.php
-QG
Yes, stat correction moved the carry from Stewart to Ogbonnaya.Hmm, Jonathan Stewart shows up with 7.7, but nfl.com has him with 7.2 (there appears to be 1 carry for 5 yards that may have changed).
larger rosters might be surviving at a better rate, but look at the top 500 entries-- the average roster size is 21 (20.9 to be exact).Size Count Alive Surv Rate18 5667 1176 20.80%19 1920 472 24.60%20 1519 440 29.00%21 1169 384 32.80%22 1013 342 33.80%23 742 276 37.20%24 538 212 39.40%25 457 177 38.70%26 329 122 37.10%27 249 108 43.40%28 218 99 45.40%29 177 76 42.90%30 272 116 42.60%http://o.ffense.com/fbg35k/owned.phpTop 500 Overall Entries: http://o.ffense.com/fbg35k/overall.php
- average roster size alive is 21.2 and the average roster size to start the contest was 20.4larger rosters might be surviving at a better rate, but look at the top 500 entries-- the average roster size is 21 (20.9 to be exact).Size Count Alive Surv Rate18 5667 1176 20.80%19 1920 472 24.60%20 1519 440 29.00%21 1169 384 32.80%22 1013 342 33.80%23 742 276 37.20%24 538 212 39.40%25 457 177 38.70%26 329 122 37.10%27 249 108 43.40%28 218 99 45.40%29 177 76 42.90%30 272 116 42.60%http://o.ffense.com/fbg35k/owned.phpTop 500 Overall Entries: http://o.ffense.com/fbg35k/overall.php
It's overall (the elimination week is displayed in the table). I thought it would be fun/informative to include teams that were eliminated but are otherwise doing great.Is the top 500 for overall or just teams still alive?
Size Count AvScore Avg SD 200+ wks18 5667 153.14 23.93 0.2619 1920 154.58 23.06 0.2520 1519 156.35 22.42 0.2621 1169 157.67 21.96 0.2622 1013 158.02 21.45 0.2923 742 159.45 21.29 0.2824 538 160.31 20.93 0.2625 457 159.32 20.48 0.2426 329 159.85 21.06 0.2527 249 161.46 20.05 0.2528 218 160.80 20.22 0.2629 177 161.67 19.95 0.2730 272 159.99 20.56 0.31Tot 14270 155.84 22.65 0.26
Rick James said:larger rosters might be surviving at a better rate, but look at the top 500 entries-- the average roster size is 21 (20.9 to be exact).
Size Top 500 All Alive18 30.6% 29.4%19 12.4% 11.8%20 9.6% 11.0%21 13.0% 9.6%22 8.2% 8.6%23 6.8% 6.9%24 4.6% 5.3%25 3.8% 4.4%26 3.0% 3.1%27 1.8% 2.7%28 1.6% 2.5%29 2.6% 1.9%30 2.0% 2.9%Avg 21.0 21.2
Yup week 10 is the one I'm sweating as well. No Luck, Morris, White , Jennings, Walsh, and Minnesota Defense. And of course Freese is on a perma-bye. The other 19 will have to step it up.need Ingram to turn it on. him and Cunningham seem to be my best hopes at RB.
The Luck/Hilton week 10 bye is going to be tough if I get that far.
Though of course there's the ultimate conundrum which is "what if the larger roster sizes were as popular as the smaller sized ones"Size Top 500 All Alive18 30.6% 29.4%19 12.4% 11.8%20 9.6% 11.0%21 13.0% 9.6%22 8.2% 8.6%23 6.8% 6.9%24 4.6% 5.3%25 3.8% 4.4%26 3.0% 3.1%27 1.8% 2.7%28 1.6% 2.5%29 2.6% 1.9%30 2.0% 2.9%Avg 21.0 21.2This is the distribution of the top 500 live teams (the top 500 on my site includes all teams alive and dead) vs. the distribution of all live teams. It is skewed a little bit to the smaller rosters but not by too much.Rick James said:larger rosters might be surviving at a better rate, but look at the top 500 entries-- the average roster size is 21 (20.9 to be exact).
If this gets changed I will be #4001 at 130.95. Knew I was in trouble last night when Tomlin decided to throw the ball even after HOU used its last TO.CalBear said:Yes, stat correction moved the carry from Stewart to Ogbonnaya.jdkapow said:Hmm, Jonathan Stewart shows up with 7.7, but nfl.com has him with 7.2 (there appears to be 1 carry for 5 yards that may have changed).
Are you sure the line doesn't move down to meet you?If this gets changed I will be #4001 at 130.95. Knew I was in trouble last night when Tomlin decided to throw the ball even after HOU used its last TO.CalBear said:Yes, stat correction moved the carry from Stewart to Ogbonnaya.jdkapow said:Hmm, Jonathan Stewart shows up with 7.7, but nfl.com has him with 7.2 (there appears to be 1 carry for 5 yards that may have changed).
I see 4 teams that drop: 111039 at 131.45, 107710 at 131.35, C McCann at 131.35, and 100810 at 131.20. Group at 131.00 would be last in by my eyeball check.Are you sure the line doesn't move down to meet you?If this gets changed I will be #4001 at 130.95. Knew I was in trouble last night when Tomlin decided to throw the ball even after HOU used its last TO.CalBear said:Yes, stat correction moved the carry from Stewart to Ogbonnaya.jdkapow said:Hmm, Jonathan Stewart shows up with 7.7, but nfl.com has him with 7.2 (there appears to be 1 carry for 5 yards that may have changed).
-QG
Yes, the cutline will be 131 if the correction is made.I see 4 teams that drop: 111039 at 131.45, 107710 at 131.35, C McCann at 131.35, and 100810 at 131.20. Group at 131.00 would be last in by my eyeball check.Are you sure the line doesn't move down to meet you?If this gets changed I will be #4001 at 130.95. Knew I was in trouble last night when Tomlin decided to throw the ball even after HOU used its last TO.CalBear said:Yes, stat correction moved the carry from Stewart to Ogbonnaya.jdkapow said:Hmm, Jonathan Stewart shows up with 7.7, but nfl.com has him with 7.2 (there appears to be 1 carry for 5 yards that may have changed).
-QG
#51 Week 9 will be the true test for me with Forte, Nelson, and Tate on BYE and then week 11 with Murray and Dez out.Ignoratio Elenchi said:Size Count Alive Surv Rate18 5667 1176 20.80%19 1920 472 24.60%20 1519 440 29.00%21 1169 384 32.80%22 1013 342 33.80%23 742 276 37.20%24 538 212 39.40%25 457 177 38.70%26 329 122 37.10%27 249 108 43.40%28 218 99 45.40%29 177 76 42.90%30 272 116 42.60%http://o.ffense.com/fbg35k/owned.phpTop 500 Overall Entries: http://o.ffense.com/fbg35k/overall.php
ESPN has it: http://games.espn.go.com/ffl/tools/statcorrections?scoringPeriodId=7Yes, the cutline will be 131 if the correction is made.
Just wanted to say Thanks QG.Always root for this sort of entry to stick aroundAP AND RICE GUY CHUGGING ALONG. LOL. How, IDK!
-QG
112060What entry number are you? I would like to see your team168 with very little chance of an increase tonight. But that would certainly have kept me in it. So, FLuck! *
*my weekly post disparaging Andrew Luck's INT in week 2, costing Adam Vinatieri an easy FG and knocking me out. Will continue to post "FLuck" weekly until I miss the cut again.
I wonder how close I am to being named in the hard luck award?
Oof, a quarter?Looks like a quarter of us have Sanders. That's got to be almost got to be a punch ticket to next week?
Iggy, you got any stats about teams not advancing that had a non-QB player post 39+ points.
Sanders and Tate…who needs RBs anyway.DWI said:Gates and Tate a good start to week.
I am as well. Works sometimes after a few refreshes.Am I the only one having trouble getting the live scoring to load?
I have probably refreshed it 30+ times and got it to go through 2 times, the one time I tried to put my team in and submit and I never got it through.I am as well. Works sometimes after a few refreshes.Am I the only one having trouble getting the live scoring to load?