?Congrats to all the Torrey Smith peeps
And it looks like Birdie made it by a wide margin
-QG
BassNBrew said:You think there’s even a snowballs chance 25 pt isn’t a lock?
You asked if there was a chance. There was.
This isn't a big deal.
Cut line moved 5.5 pts tonight with 62 pts posted and moved 2.5 pts or so last night. I said there was a snowballs chance in hell that it would move 25 pts, you said there was a chance. There was no chance.matuski said:I don't think anyone said it would.
Is this what that was all about? I think you seriously misunderstood somewhere along the line.
I resent that. Just because I go to the 4:00 early bird special doesn't mean that I got to bed at 7:00. I like to watch the nightly news and then Pat and Vanna first.
Like I said, you advanced as soon as Smith was announced active.I resent that. Just because I go to the 4:00 early bird special doesn't mean that I got to bed at 7:00. I like to watch the nightly news and then Pat and Vanna first.You can go to bed as soon as you see Smith isn't on the inactive list around 7 tonight
You do know there is a hurricane headed toward Florida right?450 points scored in the last two weeks but I'm wasting my time paying any attention to this contest at this point unless a hurricane decides to come through in next couple of weeks and move any (or all) of the 49ers, Bills, or Dolphins bye weeks.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/91/4c/93/914c9324200ca32bcbdcbe441692d051.jpgYou do know there is a hurricane headed toward Florida right?
Nope. Need to keep the fear of the turk.BassNBrew said:146.15
Moved 2.4 points with 39 pts on the board. Can we use some common sense on the cut line moving 25 pts over SNF/MNF going forward?
It was my fault...my bad, I was freaking outCut line moved 5.5 pts tonight with 62 pts posted and moved 2.5 pts or so last night. I said there was a snowballs chance in hell that it would move 25 pts, you said there was a chance. There was no chance.
What is this about? It's about people here posting about sweating a 25 pt margin when anyone who's remotely followed this contest or has an ounce of analytical skill knows that a 25 pt margin this week was a lock it up and take to the bank see ya next week. Really not much different than going into the Drew Brees thread and arguing that Bridgewater should be the starter. If the guy with 254 points had come in here posting about sweating 100+ point margin, it would have only been a tad more insane then sweating 25 pts this week.
That is incorrect. He needed 6.5 points to get me in. It was the TD that put me over.Like I said, you advanced as soon as Smith was announced active.
Alex Smith hasn't scored under 6.5 points in almost a decade. He scored 6 in week 16 of 2010. If he was playing, you were advancing. Also if he wasn't playing, the cut likely wouldn't have moved 5.5 points.That is incorrect. He needed 6.5 points to get me in. It was the TD that put me over.
You weren't freakiing out, you had a legit case to sweat. Anytime you're on the wrong side of the cut line it's time. I was just surprise at the large number of people freaking out when they weren't even remotely in danger. Just me, but either come here and post how awesome your team did or post your sweat situation...we can offer congrats or in the second situation root you on if it's not going to torpedo our team. You fell into the later category.It was my fault...my bad, I was freaking out
Actually you should be hoping for the reverse. You want Cook owners left alive and the owners of players you don't own out.Exactly how I feel at this point. Not gonna win the contest, but other than one week I haven't had much of a sweat so far. Dalvin Cook is my most expensive player so I'm just hoping all the other Cook owners get knocked out now, and then he can get healthy and go on a tear later in the season.
My take on uniqueness in this contest has always been that it's vastly overrated. The fun part of this contest is that what's good for one phase is suboptimal for the other, and vice versa. Ultimately all I want is for Cook to score a lot of points when I need him to score a lot of points. But if I did happen to make it to the final 250, it would be great if I was the only Cook owner there.Actually you should be hoping for the reverse. You want Cook owners left alive and the owners of players you don't own out.
Agreed. It would be best for you to have the Cooks owners get knocked out further down the road and based on the performance of their players who are different than yours.My take on uniqueness in this contest has always been that it's vastly overrated. The fun part of this contest is that what's good for one phase is suboptimal for the other, and vice versa. Ultimately all I want is for Cook to score a lot of points when I need him to score a lot of points. But if I did happen to make it to the final 250, it would be great if I was the only Cook owner there.
I don't recall anyone "sweating" it. Just saying there was a chance (thank you for quoting the repeated attempts to remind you). You are sweating my posts more than anyone the 25 point cushion.Cut line moved 5.5 pts tonight with 62 pts posted and moved 2.5 pts or so last night. I said there was a snowballs chance in hell that it would move 25 pts, you said there was a chance. There was no chance.
What is this about? It's about people here posting about sweating a 25 pt margin when anyone who's remotely followed this contest or has an ounce of analytical skill knows that a 25 pt margin this week was a lock it up and take to the bank see ya next week. Really not much different than going into the Drew Brees thread and arguing that Bridgewater should be the starter. If the guy with 254 points had come in here posting about sweating 100+ point margin, it would have only been a tad more insane then sweating 25 pts this week.
wowwow, last week, squeezed by by .50, this week landed on the cutoff, onward we go!
About the same chance as you beating Mayweather.I don't recall anyone "sweating" it. Just saying there was a chance (thank you for quoting the repeated attempts to remind you). You are sweating my posts more than anyone the 25 point cushion.
The line didn't move 25. That doesn't mean the line could not have moved 25. There was a chance.
Your awful analogies are wonderful though.
That's cool. Win this and that would be the stuff of legends.wow, last week, squeezed by by .50, this week landed on the cutoff, onward we go!
Tre-Quan Smith was my savior! Continue on to next week to sweat it again!Tre'Quan Smith (my flyer) has the best chance to be used replacing Cooper's dud.
I have used 24 out of 29 so far. $208 out of $250 used. Most expensive WR is still unused, but he isn't a dud just yet (Goodwin).Used 23 out of 30 so far. Hilariously two of the sevent unused are my most expensive QB and 2nd most expensive WR. $199 out of $250 used.
-QG
I have used 24 of 30 and $209 of $250 so surprisingly close to you.I have used 24 out of 29 so far. $208 out of $250 used. Most expensive WR is still unused, but he isn't a dud just yet (Goodwin).
Pos Player $ St SPts
QB Jameis Winston $10 0 0.00
QB Andy Dalton $6 3 96.35
QB Josh Allen $3 1 31.70
QB Sam Darnold $3 1 27.40
RB Todd Gurley $37 5 128.00
RB LeVeon Bell $37 0 0.00
RB Peyton Barber $8 0 0.00
RB Bilal Powell $7 5 47.90
RB Chase Edmonds $3 0 0.00
WR Antonio Brown $37 5 102.30
WR Anthony Miller $7 0 0.00
WR Keelan Cole $7 2 35.60
WR Michael Gallup $6 0 0.00
WR Chris Godwin $6 3 48.10
WR John Brown $6 4 67.20
WR John Ross $5 1 13.20
WR TreQuan Smith $3 1 26.10
TE Rob Gronkowski $26 4 66.80
TE Jared Cook $8 4 88.00
TE Nick Vannett $3 0 0.00
TE Ryan Griffin $3 1 15.50
PK Zane Gonzalez $2 1 7.80
PK Kaimi Fairbairn $2 1.5 19.80
PK Cody Parkey $2 2.5 33.30
PK Jason Sanders $2 0 0.00
DT Washington Redskins $3 0 0.00
DT Oakland Raiders $2 1 16.00
DT Miami Dolphins $2 2 19.00
DT Indianapolis Colts $2 1 9.00
DT Cleveland Browns $2 1 16.00
You know who I hope gets knocked out? All 1242 of the remaining 18-player teams. Those are the stud-filled teams that are hard to compete with at the end. No offense to anyone reading this with 18 players.I have used 24 of 30 and $209 of $250 so surprisingly close to you.
Here's hoping a lot of Saints based teams get knocked out this week. Otherwise, they are looking very hard to beat.
Most of them will get knocked out, that's a certainty. And historically I think the winner is not usually an 18-person roster (but I might be misremembering).You know who I hope gets knocked out? All 1242 of the remaining 18-player teams. Those are the stud-filled teams that are hard to compete with at the end. No offense to anyone reading this with 18 players.
Last year, the top 25 consisted of teams that had everything except 29 players - which is what I have.Most of them will get knocked out, that's a certainty. And historically I think the winner is not usually an 18-person roster (but I might be misremembering).
Last year the highest finish for an 18-man roster was 15, but in 2016 an 18-man team won.Most of them will get knocked out, that's a certainty. And historically I think the winner is not usually an 18-person roster (but I might be misremembering).
Technically, you used Hurst in week 2I've used $205 out of $250, and 21 out of 28 players. Interestingly, I have one unused player from each category (two for WR), but yet I still feel pretty confident that all of those unused players will get used at some point, with the possible exception of Gallup who just seems like wasted space. Unused players so far:
Winston (will likely get used at some point now that he's playing, if only for covering bye weeks)
Kerryon Johnson (almost certain he'll get used, but he's just been edged out a couple of times so far)
Gallup (as mentioned, may be wasted, but here's to hoping he somehow finds life later in the season)
E. St. Brown (was basically a $2 throw-in but he almost counted last week, and if injuries continue for GB, he may be useful)
H. Hurst (just starting to see playing time after injury, may need him given my lack of talent at TE)
Lambo (almost certain to be used at some point, but haven't needed him yet and he was my most expensive kicker)
Dallas D (have to figure they'll get used during bye weeks or somewhere down the road)
Haha, yes, I debated whether I should count that as him being used.Technically, you used Hurst in week 2
If my notes are accurate, this is how many players the winner has had each year:Last year the highest finish for an 18-man roster was 15, but in 2016 an 18-man team won.
I checked, and you are correct about the above numbers. Also, I disagree that 2010 thru 2017 isn't a large enough sample size. The reason is because only 1 team had a large roster, 3 had the minimum, and 4 had medium-sized rosters. 18, 18, 18, 23, 24, 25, 25, and 28, when all those teams could have had 30. 87.5% of teams were small or medium, and 12.5% were large. If the numbers were more spread out from 18 to 30, I would agree. In the end, I think you are more likely to make the finals with a large roster, but the winner is more likely to be the lucky studly team that avoided injury.If my notes are accurate, this is how many players the winner has had each year:
So since 2010 when the rosters were expanded to allow 18-30 players, 3 of 8 winners have been 18 players, 4 had 23-25 players, and 1 had 28 players. In 2009 the largest possible roster won as well. There's maybe some merit to the idea that an 18-player roster that survives to the end is stronger than a larger roster, but it hasn't really played out that way in our small sample of actual contest seasons (as opposed to, say, the idea that larger rosters will have a higher survival rate over the course of the season, which does always consistently happen).
- 2017 - 23
- 2016 - 18
- 2015 - 28
- 2014 - 24
- 2013 - 18* (2-week final round)
- 2012 - 25
- 2011 - 18
- 2010 - 25
- 2009 - 24* (Rosters had to be 20-24 players)
- 2008 and prior all rosters were 22 players.