Judge Smails
Footballguy
And a Sunday night start no less. Uggh. Abdominal. He may blow up at home...on my bench.
It goes fast for running backs. Especially ones that run as hard as Lynch.Ok, is Lynch breaking down?
Redraft I hope, I would hold in dynasty.Desperately trying to include Rawls in a package deal to the Lynch owner.
Yes, 90% redraft, though he is keeper-eligible in my limited keeper format.Redraft I hope, I would hold in dynasty.Desperately trying to include Rawls in a package deal to the Lynch owner.
shady inc said:I added Rawls for insurance
What's your league scoring and how many rbs do you start?What are your thoughts on this strategy?
I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.
versus
Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??
.375 PPR. RB touchdowns based on length of TD score.What's your league scoring and how many rbs do you start?What are your thoughts on this strategy?
I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.
versus
Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??
I hate leagues like that. They need to do away with the feature.league i have Lynch in locks all players at 1pm EST
..... if i dont hear better news by 12:45 im starting Rawls
If more reports come out that sound bad about Lynch I would probably roll the dice with Rawls over Andrews. If Lynch ends up playing then put him in.robb said:What are your thoughts on this strategy?
I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.
versus
Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??
Problem with that is the game is at 830 and we wont know all day. this stinksIf more reports come out that sound bad about Lynch I would probably roll the dice with Rawls over Andrews. If Lynch ends up playing then put him in.robb said:What are your thoughts on this strategy?
I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.
versus
Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??
This is true....... which prompted my question!Problem with that is the game is at 830 and we wont know all day. this stinksIf more reports come out that sound bad about Lynch I would probably roll the dice with Rawls over Andrews. If Lynch ends up playing then put him in.robb said:What are your thoughts on this strategy?
I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.
versus
Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??
When I was talking reports it was in regards to the Schefter types who kind of give you a feel if the guy is going to play form their "insider" reports. Have another hour or so for more stuff to leak out. They aren't always right but if you have Rawls you are good either way.This is true....... which prompted my question!Problem with that is the game is at 830 and we wont know all day. this stinksIf more reports come out that sound bad about Lynch I would probably roll the dice with Rawls over Andrews. If Lynch ends up playing then put him in.robb said:What are your thoughts on this strategy?
I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.
versus
Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??
Right now I am going to start Rawls and hope he starts...or at least plays. It's a gamble, but one I am thinking could pay off in a Seattle home game in the rain/snow.
But....... I could be talked out of it with sound reasoning!!
Latest report from Schefter sounds no good. The wall has been hit with Marshawn it seems.
Who cares? You can apply the same logic to other situations.So this has become a Robbs team strategy thread?
Yup.No way would I drop Starks for him - if a lynch owner, maybe white.