BeastMode - all of a sudden Q the Friday after a bye week? (1 Viewer)

[Judge Smails]

And a Sunday night start no less. Uggh. Abdominal. He may blow up at home...on my bench.

 

[shady inc]

I added Rawls for insurance

 

[Insein]

Is it sudden or is it.... Because he's leading in Soulflys pole?

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

Ok, is Lynch breaking down?

 

[Insein]

Ok, is Lynch breaking down?

It goes fast for running backs. Especially ones that run as hard as Lynch.

 

[Jack White]

Desperately trying to include Rawls in a package deal to the Lynch owner.

 

[Dezbelief]

Desperately trying to include Rawls in a package deal to the Lynch owner.

Redraft I hope, I would hold in dynasty.

 

[Soulfly3]

All of a sudden, as in... as of Tuesday?

https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?/topic/736794-the-soulfly-weekly-player-destroyer-thread/

 

[The General]

He's gonna play although he seems to like missing the beginning of Cardinal games.

 

[Sabertooth]

I'm not taking chances. Antonio Andréws is in for me.

 

[Jack White]

Desperately trying to include Rawls in a package deal to the Lynch owner.

Redraft I hope, I would hold in dynasty.

Yes, 90% redraft, though he is keeper-eligible in my limited keeper format.

 

[ninerfan]

He has chronic issues, boss!

 

[eoMMan]

I added Rawls for insurance

 

[scothawk]

Team expects him to play, but I think we are going to see more and more Rawls over the next few weeks to keep Lynch as healthy as possible for the playoffs assumign they make it.

Not sure where it leaves Fred Jackson.

 

[devouredbychaos]

Rawls a better option than Crowell the rest of the season? Finally dropped Rawls in redraft last week but suddenly I'm regretting it

 

[robb]

What are your thoughts on this strategy?

I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.

versus

Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??

 

[ldizzle]

What are your thoughts on this strategy?

I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.

versus

Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??

What's your league scoring and how many rbs do you start?

 

[robb]

What are your thoughts on this strategy?

I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.

versus

Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??

What's your league scoring and how many rbs do you start?

.375 PPR. RB touchdowns based on length of TD score.

Can start 2 or 3 running backs, but with Megatron, Diggs, Evans, Hurns and DJax I will only start 2 RBs this week.

 

[leave a whisper]

league i have Lynch in locks all players at 1pm EST

..... if i dont hear better news by 12:45 im starting Rawls

 

[Insein]

league i have Lynch in locks all players at 1pm EST

..... if i dont hear better news by 12:45 im starting Rawls

I hate leagues like that. They need to do away with the feature.

 

[jurrassic]

Dr. Jene calls it sports hernia territory. Dropped J Bell for Rawls. Could be a season long issue

 

[The General]

Latest report from Schefter sounds no good. The wall has been hit with Marshawn it seems.

 

[The General]

What are your thoughts on this strategy?

I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.

versus

Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??

If more reports come out that sound bad about Lynch I would probably roll the dice with Rawls over Andrews. If Lynch ends up playing then put him in.

 

[pantherclub]

What are your thoughts on this strategy?

I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.

versus

Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??

If more reports come out that sound bad about Lynch I would probably roll the dice with Rawls over Andrews. If Lynch ends up playing then put him in.

Problem with that is the game is at 830 and we wont know all day. this stinks

 

[robb]

What are your thoughts on this strategy?

I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.

versus

Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??

If more reports come out that sound bad about Lynch I would probably roll the dice with Rawls over Andrews. If Lynch ends up playing then put him in.

Problem with that is the game is at 830 and we wont know all day. this stinks

This is true....... which prompted my question!

Right now I am going to start Rawls and hope he starts...or at least plays. It's a gamble, but one I am thinking could pay off in a Seattle home game in the rain/snow.

But....... I could be talked out of it with sound reasoning!!

 

[The General]

What are your thoughts on this strategy?

I have Rawls. I was thinking of waiting until game time tonight to see if I should start Rawls. He should be able to score some points on Arizona. If Lynch starts, I could instead plug in Blue on Monday night.

versus

Simply playing Andrews this afternoon against Carolina and be done with it??

If more reports come out that sound bad about Lynch I would probably roll the dice with Rawls over Andrews. If Lynch ends up playing then put him in.

Problem with that is the game is at 830 and we wont know all day. this stinks

This is true....... which prompted my question!

Right now I am going to start Rawls and hope he starts...or at least plays. It's a gamble, but one I am thinking could pay off in a Seattle home game in the rain/snow.

But....... I could be talked out of it with sound reasoning!!

When I was talking reports it was in regards to the Schefter types who kind of give you a feel if the guy is going to play form their "insider" reports. Have another hour or so for more stuff to leak out. They aren't always right but if you have Rawls you are good either way.

Andrews against Carolina isn't a great option, if you had something better I'd do that because worse case for Seattle RB's is Lynch and Rawls end up splitting carries and Arizona isn't a great matchup.

I live about 10 miles north of the stadium and weather shouldn't be an issue.

Of all this - it won't be snowing is the one thing I can guarantee

 

[dirtyjay]

So this has become a Robbs team strategy thread?

 

[dirtyjay]

Latest report from Schefter sounds no good. The wall has been hit with Marshawn it seems.

 

[The General]

So this has become a Robbs team strategy thread?

Who cares? You can apply the same logic to other situations.

 

[johnnyboy8102]

I am rolling with Rawls. This is quickly becoming a lost season for beast mode.

 

[mullenium]

Drop Starks or James white for Rawls?

 

[elbowrm]

No way would I drop Starks for him - if a lynch owner, maybe white

 

[SameSongNDance]

Rawls needs to be owned in 10+ team leagues regardless of format.

 

[The General]

No way would I drop Starks for him - if a lynch owner, maybe white.

Yup.

 

[Das Boot]

FWIW, this is the blub update for Lynch on ESPN's fantasy league site:

Lynch (abdomen) was in so much pain Saturday that he couldn't go through the Seahawks' walk-through, Fox's Jay Glazer reports.
Spin: Lynch tested negative for a sports hernia, but he's going to be a true game-time decision Sunday night.