Come on, really? Backups can't have name value? Do I need to bring out the list?
It depends on your league. If you can carry a player for a year or two without needing any dependable production, even for a fill-in start, then of course keep him. If your league has shallow rosters and you absolutely have to use your entire roster, then there might be some options out there that are better suited to production in 2011. Can you honestly say you would rather have him in dynasty than Peyton Hillis? Ask the Hillis owner in your dynasty league if he would trade him straight for Stewart.
I don't put it all on Stewart: he's obviously playing on a terrible team for a HC that has completely checked out and an OC that has suffered a particular amnesia that only relates to having an effective run game. But to ingnore the warning signs that are coming from him and him alone (I'm sorry but averaging 2.1 ypc two games in a row with 14 carries is a HUGE ONE) is major folly. This is a guy who is constantly battling nagging injuries and has been since college. Is it really that inconceivable that he's lost it? Especially in light of recent performance?
-
Backups don't have name value as it pertains to frame of your argument. People aren't going to overrate a backup running back who has never had a full time starting job simply based on name.OK, you made me do it. Dwill behind Foster, drafted ahead despite no production to go on
Sjax over Faulk, despite no production to go on
MJD over Fred, despite no production to go on
Gore behind Barlow, despite no production to go on
ANYONE can have name value. Name value is completely indpendent of anything else because it is name value.
- I admit I don't play in any leagues that force you to use your entire roster on a weekly basis and I can concede that in this situation, there may be better options than Stewart. However, since I'm guessing leagues without benches generally dont exist, that means that in 99.9% of leagues, Stewart is ABSOLUTELY, UNQUESTIONABLY, AND WITHOUT A DOUBT ROSTERABLE.
My dynasty league has 25 roster spots and 15 starters.
- I would take Jonathan Stewart over Peyton Hillis on my dynasty league 100 out of 100 times. I just emailed the Hillis owner in my league if he would trade Peyton Hillis for Stewart (I own neither) and he said he wouldn't be able to get to the accept button fast enough. I think you will find the VAST majority of Hillis owners would ship him for Stewart in an nanosecond.
Suit yourself. I'll check back on this at the end of 2011 and see how smart that looked. And I guarantee if I am wrong I will come back and say so.
- I'm sorry, but a 2 game sample size is a completely trivial and insignificant sample size and basing dynasty decisions on a 2 game sampling is flat out bad process at its finest.
I'm only using 2 games to emphasize that he is doing worse, not better, with more carries. I am using this entire season as my sample. Which is still small in dynasty terms I admit. No one has yet made one comment on the possibility that dealing with nagging injuries his entire college and pro career might actually be affecting him. Seems like cognitive dissonance if you ask me.
- Yes, it is very hard for me to to believe that a player at the age of 23 simply loses it essentially overnight. It can happen in baseball, which is so much mental, but really doesn't happen in football, where its mostly physical.
Not overnight, over the course of his entire career. Including college. It's just hard to see since it's coming on the heels of his best season.
- I'm more convinced than ever that your postings are both a fishing trip and simple venting over a dissapointing performance by Stewart yesterday, so I will stop giving you fodder now.
You really think I would still be posting here to say "I got you kinda!"??