What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

NFC Championship GB@Seattle (1 Viewer)

Expecting more out of the Hawks today, honestly. Maybe they have something in this drive... *bounces off Wilson's hands* Or not...

 
Considering the only points today for Seattle was a fake Fg, Green Bays defense has put on a dominating performance.

 
Mike Periera saying that personal foul was not a dead ball foul, not loss of down. Terrible call.
It's literally not even possible for it not to be a dead ball foul. If it wasn't a dead ball foul, then there was zero reason to even call it a penalty. But it clearly happened after the sack and was clearly a dead ball foul.

Mike Pereira sticking up the for refs when they clearly blew it once again. And he is getting shredded for it on Twitter.
But who is to say the fault is the ref's? It may have been the fault of the Packers coaches. They may not have understood the explanation from the refs and declined the penalty. The refs may be asking themselves "What the hell were they thinking?"
This could be possible too. Won't know till after the game.
Good point... could've been a coaching mishap. Doubt it though as the refs didn't explain "after the play" like they normally do. Not sure why they didn't... I agree I'm not entirely sure how you can have a "late hit" without it being a dead ball foul. If the ball isn't dead, then it shouldn't be a late hit.
wasn't it called unnecessary roughness during the play?
Yeah, but how is that roughness during the play? It's not like it was hard hit or anything, he just fell ontop of the guy as he went to the ground. That call shouldn't be allowed "during" the play. It should either be after the play or not at all.
Its listed as unnecessary roughness. Terrible call.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top