Eephus
Footballguy
Self-medicate beforehandIt is, go for it...trust meChecking in here for the first time today... it's not worth trying to catch up on the last several pages, right?
Self-medicate beforehandIt is, go for it...trust meChecking in here for the first time today... it's not worth trying to catch up on the last several pages, right?
10 - sad by the loss, but ecstatic with where the team is, and the process it went through to get to this point.I'm not confusing anything.You are confusing things.I was thinking this too.USA played 4 games and finished 1-2-1? Last 3 games they were 0-2-1?
Are we really that happy over this and that we played hard and gave a good effort? I obviously don't know much but it looked to me like we overmatched for much of the tourney and were only saved by a world class goalie.
I think for me, that's one of the big obstacles in that we're supposed to be happy with just being competitive.
And this isn't remotely like having 300 NBA teams and making the Sweet 16. There is no salary cap or draft allocation or evening out of the players. The NBA or NFL by definition has self imposed parity where teams all play from a level field. Our country has huge financial, population and resource advantages and we're told to be happy with being competitive. I think for many, that's an issue. Just my observation.
J
We all want the team to do better. Not a single US fan is satisfied per say. We all hope and expect the team to do better in the coming decades.
But I think we also understand realistically the gap between the US and these teams was (outside of Ghana which we were even).
There is a significant difference between understanding where the US stands today and calling it a failure because they lost to teams significantly better than they were.
On a scale of 1 (very unhappy) to 10 (extremely happy), where are you with the US team?
J
Thanks. How unique are you in feeling like this do you think?10 - sad by the loss, but ecstatic with where the team is, and the process it went through to get to this point.I'm not confusing anything.You are confusing things.I was thinking this too.USA played 4 games and finished 1-2-1? Last 3 games they were 0-2-1?
Are we really that happy over this and that we played hard and gave a good effort? I obviously don't know much but it looked to me like we overmatched for much of the tourney and were only saved by a world class goalie.
I think for me, that's one of the big obstacles in that we're supposed to be happy with just being competitive.
And this isn't remotely like having 300 NBA teams and making the Sweet 16. There is no salary cap or draft allocation or evening out of the players. The NBA or NFL by definition has self imposed parity where teams all play from a level field. Our country has huge financial, population and resource advantages and we're told to be happy with being competitive. I think for many, that's an issue. Just my observation.
J
We all want the team to do better. Not a single US fan is satisfied per say. We all hope and expect the team to do better in the coming decades.
But I think we also understand realistically the gap between the US and these teams was (outside of Ghana which we were even).
There is a significant difference between understanding where the US stands today and calling it a failure because they lost to teams significantly better than they were.
On a scale of 1 (very unhappy) to 10 (extremely happy), where are you with the US team?
J
I think the casual fan looks at the WC as a 3-week tournament every four years. In reality it is a two and half year tournament - which will kick off again next year. Watching the Finals is like seeing the tip of the ice berg. Every team that made it to the finals accomplished something already. The next step is getting out of the group - some easier than others, but that is the next milestone for teams to judge themselves by. In 2010, the US had an easy group, in 2014, the US had an incredibly difficult group - with two top-5 teams in the world. Getting out of that group is a huge accomplishment - for Germany also.
his general thoughts are similar to mine (not sure if you saw my response) but our numbers were significantly different.Thanks. How unique are you in feeling like this do you think?10 - sad by the loss, but ecstatic with where the team is, and the process it went through to get to this point.I'm not confusing anything.You are confusing things.I was thinking this too.USA played 4 games and finished 1-2-1? Last 3 games they were 0-2-1?
Are we really that happy over this and that we played hard and gave a good effort? I obviously don't know much but it looked to me like we overmatched for much of the tourney and were only saved by a world class goalie.
I think for me, that's one of the big obstacles in that we're supposed to be happy with just being competitive.
And this isn't remotely like having 300 NBA teams and making the Sweet 16. There is no salary cap or draft allocation or evening out of the players. The NBA or NFL by definition has self imposed parity where teams all play from a level field. Our country has huge financial, population and resource advantages and we're told to be happy with being competitive. I think for many, that's an issue. Just my observation.
J
We all want the team to do better. Not a single US fan is satisfied per say. We all hope and expect the team to do better in the coming decades.
But I think we also understand realistically the gap between the US and these teams was (outside of Ghana which we were even).
There is a significant difference between understanding where the US stands today and calling it a failure because they lost to teams significantly better than they were.
On a scale of 1 (very unhappy) to 10 (extremely happy), where are you with the US team?
J
I think the casual fan looks at the WC as a 3-week tournament every four years. In reality it is a two and half year tournament - which will kick off again next year. Watching the Finals is like seeing the tip of the ice berg. Every team that made it to the finals accomplished something already. The next step is getting out of the group - some easier than others, but that is the next milestone for teams to judge themselves by. In 2010, the US had an easy group, in 2014, the US had an incredibly difficult group - with two top-5 teams in the world. Getting out of that group is a huge accomplishment - for Germany also.
J
My thoughts? 7 or 8.On a scale of 1 (very unhappy) to 10 (extremely happy), where are you with the US team?
J
I am becoming less unique every day.Thanks. How unique are you in feeling like this do you think?10 - sad by the loss, but ecstatic with where the team is, and the process it went through to get to this point.I'm not confusing anything.You are confusing things.I was thinking this too.USA played 4 games and finished 1-2-1? Last 3 games they were 0-2-1?
Are we really that happy over this and that we played hard and gave a good effort? I obviously don't know much but it looked to me like we overmatched for much of the tourney and were only saved by a world class goalie.
I think for me, that's one of the big obstacles in that we're supposed to be happy with just being competitive.
And this isn't remotely like having 300 NBA teams and making the Sweet 16. There is no salary cap or draft allocation or evening out of the players. The NBA or NFL by definition has self imposed parity where teams all play from a level field. Our country has huge financial, population and resource advantages and we're told to be happy with being competitive. I think for many, that's an issue. Just my observation.
J
We all want the team to do better. Not a single US fan is satisfied per say. We all hope and expect the team to do better in the coming decades.
But I think we also understand realistically the gap between the US and these teams was (outside of Ghana which we were even).
There is a significant difference between understanding where the US stands today and calling it a failure because they lost to teams significantly better than they were.
On a scale of 1 (very unhappy) to 10 (extremely happy), where are you with the US team?
J
I think the casual fan looks at the WC as a 3-week tournament every four years. In reality it is a two and half year tournament - which will kick off again next year. Watching the Finals is like seeing the tip of the ice berg. Every team that made it to the finals accomplished something already. The next step is getting out of the group - some easier than others, but that is the next milestone for teams to judge themselves by. In 2010, the US had an easy group, in 2014, the US had an incredibly difficult group - with two top-5 teams in the world. Getting out of that group is a huge accomplishment - for Germany also.
J
I don't have it in a location I can link to. If someone has a generic storage location I can send it to them and they can link to it. I can tell you that the US was 10-2-4 in qualifying (w-d-l) scoring 29 and allowing 13.Can you post your spreadsheet link so people see the time involved and games played before the Finals?this isn't the World Cup, it's the World Cup Finals.
they played almost 70 games during the cycle including 2 Gold Cups.I don't have it in a location I can link to. If someone has a generic storage location I can send it to them and they can link to it.I can tell you that the US was 10-2-4 in qualifying (w-d-l) scoring 29 and allowing 13.Can you post your spreadsheet link so people see the time involved and games played before the Finals?this isn't the World Cup, it's the World Cup Finals.
So for the entire cycle they were 11-3-6 34:19
I don't have it in a location I can link to. If someone has a generic storage location I can send it to them and they can link to it. I can tell you that the US was 10-2-4 in qualifying (w-d-l) scoring 29 and allowing 13.Can you post your spreadsheet link so people see the time involved and games played before the Finals?this isn't the World Cup, it's the World Cup Finals.
BrazilSo now that we are in the quarters, we have:
Brazil v Colombia
Netherlands v Costa Rica
France v Germany
Argentina v Belgium
Biggest game of those 4? I'm going to be very interested to see that Brazil Colombia match. Colombia has played better thus far but Brazil has the home field.
Final four predictions? Right now I'd go with Colombia, Netherlands, Germany, Belgium.
It would've set things back, but I don't think it would've killed it dead. France didn't exactly cruise through their qualifying either, it happens.This qualifying talk got me thinking... there was a point in qualifying where we were losing to Guatemala and if the result held, we would've been out even before the hex. How much different is the USMNT and the state of soccer in this country today if that happens?
I hate football analogies but they may be helpful given the lens that many people are looking through.Thanks. How unique are you in feeling like this do you think?10 - sad by the loss, but ecstatic with where the team is, and the process it went through to get to this point.I'm not confusing anything.You are confusing things.I was thinking this too.USA played 4 games and finished 1-2-1? Last 3 games they were 0-2-1?
Are we really that happy over this and that we played hard and gave a good effort? I obviously don't know much but it looked to me like we overmatched for much of the tourney and were only saved by a world class goalie.
I think for me, that's one of the big obstacles in that we're supposed to be happy with just being competitive.
And this isn't remotely like having 300 NBA teams and making the Sweet 16. There is no salary cap or draft allocation or evening out of the players. The NBA or NFL by definition has self imposed parity where teams all play from a level field. Our country has huge financial, population and resource advantages and we're told to be happy with being competitive. I think for many, that's an issue. Just my observation.
J
We all want the team to do better. Not a single US fan is satisfied per say. We all hope and expect the team to do better in the coming decades.
But I think we also understand realistically the gap between the US and these teams was (outside of Ghana which we were even).
There is a significant difference between understanding where the US stands today and calling it a failure because they lost to teams significantly better than they were.
On a scale of 1 (very unhappy) to 10 (extremely happy), where are you with the US team?
J
I think the casual fan looks at the WC as a 3-week tournament every four years. In reality it is a two and half year tournament - which will kick off again next year. Watching the Finals is like seeing the tip of the ice berg. Every team that made it to the finals accomplished something already. The next step is getting out of the group - some easier than others, but that is the next milestone for teams to judge themselves by. In 2010, the US had an easy group, in 2014, the US had an incredibly difficult group - with two top-5 teams in the world. Getting out of that group is a huge accomplishment - for Germany also.
J
Brazil/Germany would be a semi. Them meeting in the final isn't possible. Oh, another thing the new people might find entertaining ... The third place match.BrazilNedSo now that we are in the quarters, we have:
Brazil v Colombia
Netherlands v Costa Rica
France v Germany
Argentina v Belgium
Biggest game of those 4? I'm going to be very interested to see that Brazil Colombia match. Colombia has played better thus far but Brazil has the home field.
Final four predictions? Right now I'd go with Colombia, Netherlands, Germany, Belgium.
Germany
Argentina
Brazil
Germany
Brazil
this is why us old timers absolutely hate the semi final round of qualifying. The Hex is so much easier to manage even with better teams in it. There have been a couple of times we have been on the edge of going out before the hex and it would have been beyond brutal.This qualifying talk got me thinking... there was a point in qualifying where we were losing to Guatemala and if the result held, we would've been out even before the hex. How much different is the USMNT and the state of soccer in this country today if that happens?
Has to do with age - Howard is 35, Guzan 29.Tim howard's value seems low there.... 1/3 of our backup keeper Guzan?!Now try and estimate a number that the United States is at first, and then click to see where we are: USA.
that is a strange analogy. Most US people expect US to do well in the Olympics. I don't think even the most arrogant English fan expects that they will do well at the WC. Sure they are disappointed when they go out but it would be nothing compared to say Brazil going out early IMO in terms of what the local fan bases think.There's also a part of me that's not even sure I'd enjoy it if the US were a major soccer power. One of the things I like about the World Cup is that I'm watching for the Nats, but I'm also watching God knows how many players that I follow because of their club career. I think I'd hate watching the World Cup if I were English. It's like a little morality play with new pantomime villains every four years.
I imagine its like they way we watch the Olympics. Where we're actually concerned with the medal count and whether Russia or Germany or China finishes above us. I kind of hate that. I don't want to feel like my national esteem is concerned with whether a 16 year old girl nails her dismount.
pagingThere's also a part of me that's not even sure I'd enjoy it if the US were a major soccer power. One of the things I like about the World Cup is that I'm watching for the Nats, but I'm also watching God knows how many players that I follow because of their club career. I think I'd hate watching the World Cup if I were English. It's like a little morality play with new pantomime villains every four years.
I imagine its like they way we watch the Olympics. Where we're actually concerned with the medal count and whether Russia or Germany or China finishes above us. I kind of hate that. I don't want to feel like my national esteem is concerned with whether a 16 year old girl nails her dismount.
I'd say a 7. The net result is the same as 2010 but I think the competition was stiffer this time out. There's been four more years of improvement on the MNT and MLS levels. Time will tell if these have been four years well spent on the development front. Some of it is surely that it's Klinsmann's nature to inspire more optimism than Bob Bradley but perception is always part of the equation, particularly for a team that plays so few competitive games. There are some exciting young players in the pipeline but we've seen that before. That's really not the responsibility of the national team; you can't blame US Soccer for the failure of guys like Adu and Jovan Kirovski.I'm not confusing anything.
On a scale of 1 (very unhappy) to 10 (extremely happy), where are you with the US team?
J
This country has never produced a soccer player as good as William FaulknerI hate football analogies but they may be helpful given the lens that many people are looking through.Thanks. How unique are you in feeling like this do you think?10 - sad by the loss, but ecstatic with where the team is, and the process it went through to get to this point.I'm not confusing anything.You are confusing things.I was thinking this too.USA played 4 games and finished 1-2-1? Last 3 games they were 0-2-1?
Are we really that happy over this and that we played hard and gave a good effort? I obviously don't know much but it looked to me like we overmatched for much of the tourney and were only saved by a world class goalie.
I think for me, that's one of the big obstacles in that we're supposed to be happy with just being competitive.
And this isn't remotely like having 300 NBA teams and making the Sweet 16. There is no salary cap or draft allocation or evening out of the players. The NBA or NFL by definition has self imposed parity where teams all play from a level field. Our country has huge financial, population and resource advantages and we're told to be happy with being competitive. I think for many, that's an issue. Just my observation.
J
We all want the team to do better. Not a single US fan is satisfied per say. We all hope and expect the team to do better in the coming decades.
But I think we also understand realistically the gap between the US and these teams was (outside of Ghana which we were even).
There is a significant difference between understanding where the US stands today and calling it a failure because they lost to teams significantly better than they were.
On a scale of 1 (very unhappy) to 10 (extremely happy), where are you with the US team?
J
I think the casual fan looks at the WC as a 3-week tournament every four years. In reality it is a two and half year tournament - which will kick off again next year. Watching the Finals is like seeing the tip of the ice berg. Every team that made it to the finals accomplished something already. The next step is getting out of the group - some easier than others, but that is the next milestone for teams to judge themselves by. In 2010, the US had an easy group, in 2014, the US had an incredibly difficult group - with two top-5 teams in the world. Getting out of that group is a huge accomplishment - for Germany also.
J
If youre Ole Miss playing in the SEC, how do you define success/failure? By winning/losing the SEC West? SEC? National Championship? Cant imagine that most fans do, because theyre going to end up miserable and disinterested. But thats not how sports works. Undedogs view success by playing better, improving upon the previous years results, challenging the big dogs and knocking some Tier One teams off along the way. The journey is nearly as fun as the destintion. Ole Miss may finish 3-4 in the SEC West but if they knock off LSU and take Alabama down to the wire, Im sure fans will say they had a heck of a year. And of course, of course, they hope they can do even better the next time around.
Oh I hear ya... not unlike dynasty football. Still.. guy likely has several good year left in him. I dunno... just seems way low for an elite keeper.Has to do with age - Howard is 35, Guzan 29.Tim howard's value seems low there.... 1/3 of our backup keeper Guzan?!Now try and estimate a number that the United States is at first, and then click to see where we are: USA.
Personally I'd love to see those worlds collide. I knew Belgium's team almost better than the U.S. team and that didn't feel right. If I could watch Bayern play Chelsea in a CL semi and see 4 Americans out there, it would make that game better and following the USMNT easier. Win-win.One of the things I like about the World Cup is that I'm watching for the Nats, but I'm also watching God knows how many players that I follow because of their club career.
Once the Bundesliga comes to Fox next year this should be much easier.Personally I'd love to see those worlds collide. I knew Belgium's team almost better than the U.S. team and that didn't feel right. If I could watch Bayern play Chelsea in a CL semi and see 4 Americans out there, it would make that game better and following the USMNT easier. Win-win.One of the things I like about the World Cup is that I'm watching for the Nats, but I'm also watching God knows how many players that I follow because of their club career.
Don't leave out that three of the four games were exciting as hell at the end. You could play 10 games and not get one with as good a finale as those three.I'd place my satisfaction level at a 7. Now, I'm a soccer nerd (its pretty much the only sport I give a #### about anymore), but I'm a guy who's pretty chill about results and who recognizes that short tournaments are funny things. I wanted the US to play quality competition and I wanted them to play in a way that did not embarrass them. That happened. I got to see Clint Dempsey score a sick goal. I got to see one of my favorite MLS players have a good tournament in Kyle Beckerman. I got to see three young players in Brooks, Yedlin, and Green who I will invest way too much hope and enthusiasm in for the next four years. I also got to drink a lot of cocktails, which I always enjoy.
And now that the US is out, I only have 8 great teams and countless other cool subplots to follow.
Strictly Carson McCullers so far.This country has never produced a soccer player as good as William Faulkner
that Yedlin number might go up just a touch8 for me.
For the people who don't follow the sport year-round or at the club level, it's difficult to emphasize how much more talent Portugal, Germany, and Belgium have than the US. Hopefully we'll get to that level someday, and I think we're headed in the right direction overall.
There's a site called transfermarkt that comes up with an estimate of how much a player is "worth" if he were to be transferred. Look at the prices for the national teams of Portugal, Germany, and Belgium.
Now try and estimate a number that the United States is at first, and then click to see where we are: USA.
I want the US to get better, but I'm also realistic that there's a long, long way to go.
That's a good point. Yesterday's game was one of the better ones in the tournament for neutrals. The Ghana game was entertaining although the US seemed on the back foot. The game in Manaus was a lot better than you'd expect given the circumstances.Don't leave out that three of the four games were exciting as hell at the end. You could play 10 games and not get one with as good a finale as those three.I'd place my satisfaction level at a 7. Now, I'm a soccer nerd (its pretty much the only sport I give a #### about anymore), but I'm a guy who's pretty chill about results and who recognizes that short tournaments are funny things. I wanted the US to play quality competition and I wanted them to play in a way that did not embarrass them. That happened. I got to see Clint Dempsey score a sick goal. I got to see one of my favorite MLS players have a good tournament in Kyle Beckerman. I got to see three young players in Brooks, Yedlin, and Green who I will invest way too much hope and enthusiasm in for the next four years. I also got to drink a lot of cocktails, which I always enjoy.
And now that the US is out, I only have 8 great teams and countless other cool subplots to follow.
assuming we get out of the first round of qualifying that isGoing in I was hoping for a good showing, playing good games and keeping them competitive despite the better talent in Portugal and Germany. I felt a win vs Ghana was necessary and if we could draw one of the other two and not get beat by 3 or 4 goals it would be a solid wc. A 1-1-1 record and getting out of the group just made it all that better and nearly making the quarters gives me hope for the future.
Over the years my expectations have changed. This is basically how I look at it....
1. Hey we qualified (1990, 1994 by virtue of hosting)
2. we better qualify (1998, 2002, 2006)
3. Competitive in the group, maybe advance if we get an easier draw (2010, 2014)
With this cup (2014), I feel like up next is the feeling that any teams drawn with us know its going to be a fight and we should advance to the knockouts no matter what group we are in, group of death or group of life....
as that becomes the norm, that leads to thoughts of a long run through the knockouts followed by we can win it all.....
And yes its a simplistic view for the purposes of the message board but I think you get the point.
had forgotten about it. Would have been a major disappointment only because it sets back the building we have done since 1990....assuming we get out of the first round of qualifying that isGoing in I was hoping for a good showing, playing good games and keeping them competitive despite the better talent in Portugal and Germany. I felt a win vs Ghana was necessary and if we could draw one of the other two and not get beat by 3 or 4 goals it would be a solid wc. A 1-1-1 record and getting out of the group just made it all that better and nearly making the quarters gives me hope for the future.
Over the years my expectations have changed. This is basically how I look at it....
1. Hey we qualified (1990, 1994 by virtue of hosting)
2. we better qualify (1998, 2002, 2006)
3. Competitive in the group, maybe advance if we get an easier draw (2010, 2014)
With this cup (2014), I feel like up next is the feeling that any teams drawn with us know its going to be a fight and we should advance to the knockouts no matter what group we are in, group of death or group of life....
as that becomes the norm, that leads to thoughts of a long run through the knockouts followed by we can win it all.....
And yes its a simplistic view for the purposes of the message board but I think you get the point.
It is amazing how long ago being behind to Guat in the last game in the first round of qualifying seems now huh?
I for one am really looking forward to the Gold Cup next year.had forgotten about it. Would have been a major disappointment only because it sets back the building we have done since 1990....I guess with the rise of teams like Costa Rica along with the USA and Mexico, qualifying is going to be more difficult and wont be guaranteed. That can only help though as the USA needs to play more meaningful games vs higher competition if we want to ever be thought of as a contender for the WC title.assuming we get out of the first round of qualifying that isGoing in I was hoping for a good showing, playing good games and keeping them competitive despite the better talent in Portugal and Germany. I felt a win vs Ghana was necessary and if we could draw one of the other two and not get beat by 3 or 4 goals it would be a solid wc. A 1-1-1 record and getting out of the group just made it all that better and nearly making the quarters gives me hope for the future.
Over the years my expectations have changed. This is basically how I look at it....
1. Hey we qualified (1990, 1994 by virtue of hosting)
2. we better qualify (1998, 2002, 2006)
3. Competitive in the group, maybe advance if we get an easier draw (2010, 2014)
With this cup (2014), I feel like up next is the feeling that any teams drawn with us know its going to be a fight and we should advance to the knockouts no matter what group we are in, group of death or group of life....
as that becomes the norm, that leads to thoughts of a long run through the knockouts followed by we can win it all.....
And yes its a simplistic view for the purposes of the message board but I think you get the point.
It is amazing how long ago being behind to Guat in the last game in the first round of qualifying seems now huh?
Stop changing the rules, guy. <_<Since the 2018 World Cup thread isn't up yet I'll put this here
FIFA considering allowing a 4th substitute in games that go overtime.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/fifa-consider-allowing-4th-sub-162753698--sow.html
I think it's not unreasonable as an overtime game goes 33% longer, having 33% more substitutes might make sense.
What do you guys think?
-QG
I think its a good move that actually promotes teams trying to win in regulation - by not saving their last sub until too late in the game.Since the 2018 World Cup thread isn't up yet I'll put this here
FIFA considering allowing a 4th substitute in games that go overtime.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/fifa-consider-allowing-4th-sub-162753698--sow.html
I think it's not unreasonable as an overtime game goes 33% longer, having 33% more substitutes might make sense.
What do you guys think?
-QG
been saying this for years. no brainer.Since the 2018 World Cup thread isn't up yet I'll put this here
FIFA considering allowing a 4th substitute in games that go overtime.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/fifa-consider-allowing-4th-sub-162753698--sow.html
I think it's not unreasonable as an overtime game goes 33% longer, having 33% more substitutes might make sense.
What do you guys think?
-QG
The only thing I'd add would be to force teams to make the fourth sub either after 90' or 105'. There's already too much clock-related gamesmanship in extra time. A guy walking to the sideline at a snail's pace after 118' doesn't help the game.I think its a good move that actually promotes teams trying to win in regulation - by not saving their last sub until too late in the game.Since the 2018 World Cup thread isn't up yet I'll put this here
FIFA considering allowing a 4th substitute in games that go overtime.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/fifa-consider-allowing-4th-sub-162753698--sow.html
I think it's not unreasonable as an overtime game goes 33% longer, having 33% more substitutes might make sense.
What do you guys think?
-QG
BrilliantThe only thing I'd add would be to force teams to make the fourth sub either after 90' or 105'. There's already too much clock-related gamesmanship in extra time. A guy walking to the sideline at a snail's pace after 118' doesn't help the game.I think its a good move that actually promotes teams trying to win in regulation - by not saving their last sub until too late in the game.Since the 2018 World Cup thread isn't up yet I'll put this here
FIFA considering allowing a 4th substitute in games that go overtime.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/fifa-consider-allowing-4th-sub-162753698--sow.html
I think it's not unreasonable as an overtime game goes 33% longer, having 33% more substitutes might make sense.
What do you guys think?
-QG
The bolded is mine... just makes meRIO DE JANEIRO --
FIFA's number two official has said he's ''amazed'' by the levels of drunkenness in Brazil's World Cup stadiums, reviving a debate over whether alcohol sales should have been allowed at matches in the first place.
In an interview with Brazil's sports television network SporTV, Jerome Valcke acknowledged Monday that ''maybe there were too many people who were drunk'' at the matches and pointed to the connection between inebriation and violence.
Brazil banned alcohol sales at soccer matches in 2003 in a bid to curb fan violence. But Budweiser is a major World Cup sponsor and the tournament's organizer, FIFA, insisted Brazil lift the ban in order to host the month-long event. Lawmakers opposed to lifting the ban delayed the passage of a World Cup law that gave FIFA financial and legal guarantees to organize the event, and the issue became a major source of friction between FIFA and Brazilian officials.
During the protracted debate over the legislation, Valcke stated in 2012 that in-stadium beer sales were a key part of World Cup tradition and that lifting Brazil's ban was non-negotiable.
In Monday's SporTV interview, Valcke appeared to soften his position, saying alcohol sales are ''something we have to look at.''
''If we think that it is necessary to control (alcohol sales) we will control them,'' said Valcke, who spoke in English through a Portuguese translator. ''We would never put the organization of a match at risk.''
Fan violence has broken out at several matches here, including Saturday's Colombia-Uruguay match in Rio de Janeiro, where stewards had to intervene to separate hostile spectators. Following the match, apparently inebriated Argentine fans celebrating their team's victory over Iran on June 21 caused a dust-up in the central Brazilian city of Belo Horizonte.
Valcke stressed that in-stadium beer sales have never been a problem in previous World Cups.
''I was amazed by the number of people who were drunken and the level of alcohol'' in Brazil, he said, adding ''I was a bit surprised.''
The 2022 World Cup is scheduled to be held in Qatar, a Gulf state where alcohol consumption in public is forbidden.
except that...http://msn.foxsports.com/soccer/story/fifa-secretary-general-amazed-by-levels-of-world-cup-drunkenness-070214
The bolded is mine... just makes meRIO DE JANEIRO --
FIFA's number two official has said he's ''amazed'' by the levels of drunkenness in Brazil's World Cup stadiums, reviving a debate over whether alcohol sales should have been allowed at matches in the first place.
In an interview with Brazil's sports television network SporTV, Jerome Valcke acknowledged Monday that ''maybe there were too many people who were drunk'' at the matches and pointed to the connection between inebriation and violence.
Brazil banned alcohol sales at soccer matches in 2003 in a bid to curb fan violence. But Budweiser is a major World Cup sponsor and the tournament's organizer, FIFA, insisted Brazil lift the ban in order to host the month-long event. Lawmakers opposed to lifting the ban delayed the passage of a World Cup law that gave FIFA financial and legal guarantees to organize the event, and the issue became a major source of friction between FIFA and Brazilian officials.
During the protracted debate over the legislation, Valcke stated in 2012 that in-stadium beer sales were a key part of World Cup tradition and that lifting Brazil's ban was non-negotiable.
In Monday's SporTV interview, Valcke appeared to soften his position, saying alcohol sales are ''something we have to look at.''
''If we think that it is necessary to control (alcohol sales) we will control them,'' said Valcke, who spoke in English through a Portuguese translator. ''We would never put the organization of a match at risk.''
Fan violence has broken out at several matches here, including Saturday's Colombia-Uruguay match in Rio de Janeiro, where stewards had to intervene to separate hostile spectators. Following the match, apparently inebriated Argentine fans celebrating their team's victory over Iran on June 21 caused a dust-up in the central Brazilian city of Belo Horizonte.
Valcke stressed that in-stadium beer sales have never been a problem in previous World Cups.
''I was amazed by the number of people who were drunken and the level of alcohol'' in Brazil, he said, adding ''I was a bit surprised.''
The 2022 World Cup is scheduled to be held in Qatar, a Gulf state where alcohol consumption in public is forbidden.
But Russians can handle their alcohol better or at least aren't soccer hooligans in general.except that...http://msn.foxsports.com/soccer/story/fifa-secretary-general-amazed-by-levels-of-world-cup-drunkenness-070214
The bolded is mine... just makes meRIO DE JANEIRO --
FIFA's number two official has said he's ''amazed'' by the levels of drunkenness in Brazil's World Cup stadiums, reviving a debate over whether alcohol sales should have been allowed at matches in the first place.
In an interview with Brazil's sports television network SporTV, Jerome Valcke acknowledged Monday that ''maybe there were too many people who were drunk'' at the matches and pointed to the connection between inebriation and violence.
Brazil banned alcohol sales at soccer matches in 2003 in a bid to curb fan violence. But Budweiser is a major World Cup sponsor and the tournament's organizer, FIFA, insisted Brazil lift the ban in order to host the month-long event. Lawmakers opposed to lifting the ban delayed the passage of a World Cup law that gave FIFA financial and legal guarantees to organize the event, and the issue became a major source of friction between FIFA and Brazilian officials.
During the protracted debate over the legislation, Valcke stated in 2012 that in-stadium beer sales were a key part of World Cup tradition and that lifting Brazil's ban was non-negotiable.
In Monday's SporTV interview, Valcke appeared to soften his position, saying alcohol sales are ''something we have to look at.''
''If we think that it is necessary to control (alcohol sales) we will control them,'' said Valcke, who spoke in English through a Portuguese translator. ''We would never put the organization of a match at risk.''
Fan violence has broken out at several matches here, including Saturday's Colombia-Uruguay match in Rio de Janeiro, where stewards had to intervene to separate hostile spectators. Following the match, apparently inebriated Argentine fans celebrating their team's victory over Iran on June 21 caused a dust-up in the central Brazilian city of Belo Horizonte.
Valcke stressed that in-stadium beer sales have never been a problem in previous World Cups.
''I was amazed by the number of people who were drunken and the level of alcohol'' in Brazil, he said, adding ''I was a bit surprised.''
The 2022 World Cup is scheduled to be held in Qatar, a Gulf state where alcohol consumption in public is forbidden.
The 20218 World Cup is scheduled to be held in Russia, a European state where alcohol consumption is the fourth highest in the world, according to the World Health Organziation.