johnadams
Footballguy
I think it's more like HC has veto rights.Never saw a head coach approve plays during the game, sounds crazy to me.
I think it's more like HC has veto rights.Never saw a head coach approve plays during the game, sounds crazy to me.
ExactlyI think it's more like HC has veto rights.
I love the enthusiasm! Those are some tough road games, however. I see more of a .500 record, myself, give or take a game.San Francisco 49ers 2018 and 2019 opponents
2018
Home: SEA, LAR, ARZ, CHI, DET, DEN, OAK, NYG
Away: SEA, LAR, ARZ, GB, MIN, KC, LAC, TB
2019:
Home: SEA, LAR, ARZ, ATL, CAR, CLE, PIT, NFC North same place finisher
Away: SEA, LAR, ARZ, NO, TB, BAL, CIN, NFC East same place finisher
Next years home schedule is cake. I see 6-2 or 7-1.
Away is a different story. Rams, Packers, Vikes, Chiefs, Chargers...man...5-3 maybe?
I'll go conservative and say barring any big injuries we finish 10-6 or 11-5 next year and make the playoffs. And Ill take that all day.
Absolutely.I think the Adam Peters hire has to be mentioned here. It wasnt all Lynch and Shanny, Peters had a huge hand in scouting for the draft.
I just havent seen anyone bring his name up, but he's a major player behind the scenes and deserves some credit.
I think SF is very happy with the price tag, keeps falling and I agree they feel they solved the question. Ask teams that have no answer to that dilemma. So now they can go about focusing on rest of teamI was wrong about the trade; this guy has way more game than I anticipated. You can quibble with the valuation but at the end of the day, you are thrilled if you can get a competent long term starter.
Bad teams don't win games. Who knew?Heres an interesting stat:
49ers QB win leaders:
2017: Jimmy Garoppolo (4) and probably (5) after week 17
2016: TIE - Blaine Gabbert (1), Colin Kaepernick (1)
2015: Gabbert (3)
Lol. Just insane that Jimmy G could match the number of wins by Niner QBs over the past 2 season' in just 5 weeks.Bad teams don't win games. Who knew?
And Blake Bortles doubled it this season. He must be a ####ing god.Lol. Just insane that Jimmy G could match the number of wins by Niner QBs over the past 2 season' in just 5 weeks.
I'm fine with Breida. I don't think taking a rb at the top of the draft is a good move by any teamWhat do you guys think about Hyde? Do you want them to draft Barkley if available, or feel comfortable with Hyde as the guy?
Barkley looks like the best RB prospect I've seen in a LOOONG time...What do you guys think about Hyde? Do you want them to draft Barkley if available, or feel comfortable with Hyde as the guy?
Been wondering the same thing... There'so much hype and optimism surrounding the niners right now that I'm strangely craving a splash of his brutalistic pessimism.Where's @drummer been?
100% agree with the bolded. Even guys that are drafted high that pan out, there is almost always a more valuable player there. Ezekiel Elliott has been great, and he wasn't the best pick. Dallas would have been way better off taking Jalen Ramsey.I'm fine with Breida. I don't think taking a rb at the top of the draft is a good move by any team
Plus in a year they are going to have to decide whether to give elliott 20 million per year or let him go. that kind of salary to a rb cripples your team. Look at the packers drafting williams and jones late. Both are solid nfl rbs at no cost100% agree with the bolded. Even guys that are drafted high that pan out, there is almost always a more valuable player there. Ezekiel Elliott has been great, and he wasn't the best pick. Dallas would have been way better off taking Jalen Ramsey.
Zeke is essentially locked up for 3 more yearsPlus in a year they are going to have to decide whether to give elliott 20 million per year or let him go. that kind of salary to a rb cripples your team. Look at the packers drafting williams and jones late. Both are solid nfl rbs at no cost
I think it's 2 essentially because the 5th year is an option and he's not going to play for 4 million a year. He's going to want 15 million at leastZeke is essentially locked up for 3 more years
5th year is a team optionkillface said:I think it's 2 essentially because the 5th year is an option and he's not going to play for 4 million a year. He's going to want 15 million at least
we are sidetracked. I understand that, I'm saying he will sit before he plays for 4 million in year 5. He'll be making 15 million or not playing for the cowboys5th year is a team option
If drafted in top 10, it’s the average of 10 highest paid at the position. Rest of first round is average of 3rd through 25th hightest paid at the position.Pretty sure that using the 5th yr option is quite expensive for teams. Similar to Franchise salary, but not actually sure of how it is decided
There aren't many big name WRs available right now, but something tells me that SF will at least make a run at Sammy Watkins.Assuming no big FA WR signed, I would like to see them draft a WR in round 2 or with one of their early 3rds.
Robinson would make sense if his knee checks out.There aren't many big name WRs available right now, but something tells me that SF will at least make a run at Sammy Watkins.
And he's coming from a division rival.Robinson would make sense if his knee checks out.
Watkins is interesting for sure. Stayed healthy this year which is a good sign
I would prefer they go after one of the Jacksonville WRs. Both Robinson and Lee are are up for free agency and I think both would be cheaper than Watkins, although I guess it depends on how far along Robinson is in his rehab. Lee could be a nice grab, along the lines of what Woods did for the Rams.There aren't many big name WRs available right now, but something tells me that SF will at least make a run at Sammy Watkins.
Read that the Rams were considering tagging him, but not sure how accurate that was. Seems a really high price to pay, even for one season.And he's coming from a division rival.
I'd be shocked if they tagged him. He's not deserving of anything close to that salary. They would be fine without himRead that the Rams were considering tagging him, but not sure how accurate that was. Seems a really high price to pay, even for one season.
Just watched some youtube highlights of all the top WR prospects coming out next year... St. Brown and Kirk were the two that caught my attention.Assuming no big FA WR signed, I would like to see them draft a WR in round 2 or with one of their early 3rds.
-The kid with the long 1st name, St Brown from ND looks intriguing. Big body with speed. Seems like he is projected anywhere from early 2nd to mid 3rd. Read where he is a good route runner who was open a lot, but the crappy ND QBs couldn't get him the ball.
-Pettis from Washington: 6 or 6'1" depending on which site you look at. Some people love him while others say he is a JAG. Excellent punt returner which they can use. Projected anywhere from later 2nd round to later 3rd.
Any of you big college football fans have any input?
Two of the last three teams that did it (Jags and Rams) are in the playoffs with that RB being a big part of the equation and Dallas was last year in large part because of Elliot. It's the same as everyt position if the talent is there it's a good pick, if it's not it's not.Any team who takes a RB in the top 10 are idiots.
Couldn’t disagree more. It’s not a good long-term investment. A lot of RBs would be thriving in those environments. A top pick at a key position is much more impactful.Two of the last three teams that did it (Jags and Rams) are in the playoffs with that RB being a big part of the equation and Dallas was last year in large part because of Elliot. It's the same as everyt position if the talent is there it's a good pick, if it's not it's not.
I think it's dumb to make absolute blanket statements.Couldn’t disagree more. It’s not a good long-term investment. A lot of RBs would be thriving in those environments. A top pick at a key position is much more impactful.
It’s even more of a disaster recently due to the last 2 RB classes. The position is getting restocked.
I can’t even begin to explain how dumb it is, IMO.
Maybe things could change, but with the way positional dynamics are right now, taking a RB in the top 10 is absurd, IMO.I think it's dumb to make absolute blanket statements.
If that RB is one of the ten best players in the draft, then it's not absurd. I also pointed out how the last 3 RBs drafted in the top 10 made major impacts on the teams that drafted them.Maybe things could change, but with the way positional dynamics are right now, taking a RB in the top 10 is absurd, IMO.
That goes for the whole 1st round unless it’s a very specific sitiation where you’re deep everywhere else & it’s the last piece.
Otherwise, trust your scouting department to find a stud on day-2. They’re getting plentiful. There’s numerous recent examples.
Fournette went to a team with a number 1 defense. That's why they are in the playoffs. They would be in the playoffs with ivory in the backfield quite frankly. Same with zeke. Dallas had by the far the best oline in the league. They couldn't have drafted someone in the third round and had a similar record.If that RB is one of the ten best players in the draft, then it's not absurd. I also pointed out how the last 3 RBs drafted in the top 10 made major impacts on the teams that drafted them.
And there are day 2 studs at other positions as well. It was a popular thing to say for a while - but frankly there just weren't any RBs worthy of being first round picks for a while.
Barkley will almost certainly be a first round pick this year (and likely top 10) and my guess is he'll make a major impact on the team that takes him. Now sure there are more valuable positions where if all else is equal you wouldn't take the RB, but there's always different ways to build a roster.
How did the Jags do with Ivory the season before? How did the Cowboys do in 2015 or this season when Zeke was out?Fournette went to a team with a number 1 defense. That's why they are in the playoffs. They would be in the playoffs with ivory in the backfield quite frankly. Same with zeke. Dallas had by the far the best oline in the league. They couldn't have drafted someone in the third round and had a similar record.
if someone is desperate for a rb, then trade down. They are like wr's. GM's pick them because they are flashy but eventually they cripple your team because you just can't invest that kind of money in those positions.