Meh, it happens to all of usWith that said, my favorite play this weekend is Dallas ML, +154. Solely based on the comments in this game thread:
Sunday Night Football *** 49ers vs Cowboys *** (+3.5, 45)
Apologies to @Ministry of Pain, didn't wanna wait. 🙂 Might as well start this one now! Let's go!forums.footballguys.com
Nobody in that thread picked Dallas and are talking like the 49ers will win by 7 to 14 points. But Vegas says the game will be decided by a FG. Considering it is SNF, I smell an upset cooking. Vegas is not trying very hard to get you not to bet on San Francisco. In fact, with a line like that they are encouraging it.
If they wanted action on the Cowboys, they would have set the line at +5.5 or +6. But that's the whole point, imo, they don't want Cowboys action. They want everyone on San Francisco and I'm not falling for it.
Cowboys ML, +154 (Cowboys +3.5 if you're a *****). BUNKER BUSTER!!!
As a Niners fan I hope you're wrong. But I have a feeling Parsons et al are going to rattle Purdy all game and you'll be right.
Pleasant Sunday evening owning my loss.
agree, but im staying away all togetherLeaning Packers, but they are certainly a public dog.
I'm gonna sleep on it.
Cowboys are like a kid who makes all A's in high school but flunks out of AP.Daks Cowboys don’t win games like this one
I cowboy'd up a couple years ago.Did you ever think that cowboy boots and hats are regular Friday night wear for a large swath of the United States? Being a northerner in Nashville for the last few days... mind blowing
That said, I am ready to buy my 1st pair of Cowboy Boots
MMMM ... Outdoorsy wimmen. I am not sure that group is "slim" but they are usually toned. For me, toned over skinny every day just like you take home dogs on National TV games.Skinny women over thirty are hard to find, but these outdoorsy chicks are something else. I bet all that hiking probably gets them worked up during the daytime so they gotta stay slim for the night. And with that body, at her age, you know she has health insurance. Even if she had gray hair I don't think it would slow me down.
less brittletoned over skinny every day
Maybe I should stick to NFLPitt -1.5. Boosted to +157
Louisiana Tech +3
Appalachian State -5.5
Liberty -6.5
+567
Hopefully the late games are equally kind.Taylor Hall point +114
Connor Bedard 4+ shots -115
Oilers win -160
Kevin Fiala 3+ shots -168
3/4 ain't bad.Hopefully the late games are equally kind.Taylor Hall point +114
Connor Bedard 4+ shots -115
Oilers win -160
Kevin Fiala 3+ shots -168
DK has it at +1203/4 ain't bad.Hopefully the late games are equally kind.Taylor Hall point +114
Connor Bedard 4+ shots -115
Oilers win -160
Kevin Fiala 3+ shots -168
Tage Thompson any time goal at +170 tonight
I have a pet theory on this: I don't claim any great scholarly insight, just something I've noticed listening to both sides describe their positions:Palestine has land Israel believes is theirs.Apologies if honda. I'm not knowledgeable about this situation.
Is there a good and concise link to an article summarizing what the main points of conflict are? I know it's long running and complex. But trying to get a basic understanding.
Thanks. Is there a summary-type article you can link to that is a good summary with more information?
I took a history class called the Arab Israeli Conflict which required a lot of heavy reading (including quite a bit of the Old Testament). I'd love to point you to some Cliff's notes but this is a very complex, incredibly historical conflict that dates back centuries and has many layers. I bet some of our power lifters in here could recommend some quick summaries but even after spending a semester studying it, I'm not sure how to sum it up any better than there's a small piece of land that different religions view as not only holy, but theirs and theirs alone. Sharing it hasn't been a peaceful solution. And I don't know what a viable solution would be that satisfies everybody and ends the violence.
Yep. It seems easy as a Westerner to think they should be able to peacefully coexist and share the land. Neither side wants that. They think it should only be "theirs." And they'll do what it takes to make it so.
My theory is that one of the root causes of the conflict is that the Israelis and the Palestinians are operating from fundamentally different paradigms. Israel was founded by European immigrants (although that is no longer true of the country's demographics), and Europeans think of a nation as an idea. Nations like Poland existed for centuries not on any map, but in the minds of people who shared an identity.
Meanwhile, there has essentially never been a nation called Palestine. What the Palestinians had was not a shared identity, but land. I had a geometry teacher in high school who was Palestinian American, and he told me once that his family still had the deed to their home, which they had been driven out of by Israeli forces.
These differing approaches can be seen in how each side reacted to the idea of compromise. When the 1947 UN Partition Plan proposed an Israeli territory far smaller than what the Zionists were hoping for, they nonetheless accepted it because the most important thing was to have a state of Israel for the first time in centuries. But when Arafat was similarly offered half a loaf at Camp David in 2000, he turned it down because having a sliver of land -- and agreeing to foreswear any claims on the land that was taken from them -- wasn't enough for the Palestinian aspirations. (Arafat also probably knew that, because such a deal would be viewed unfavorably by the Palestinian public, agreeing to it would likely cost him his life)
3/4 ain't bad.Hopefully the late games are equally kind.Taylor Hall point +114
Connor Bedard 4+ shots -115
Oilers win -160
Kevin Fiala 3+ shots -168
Tage Thompson any time goal at +170 tonight
I used to think that this weekend was a prime let down spot for SF - given the way CLE is playing and injuries... SF is going to destroy them. Maybe that is a crazy naive take, but I don't think so.
I used to think that this weekend was a prime let down spot for SF - given the way CLE is playing and injuries... SF is going to destroy them. Maybe that is a crazy naive take, but I don't think so.
I hope you're right. Laid the -5 on Tuesday, had a feeling that # was including Watson in the lineup and I had a feeling he might not play. Something is really off with that whole situation.
Breaks armHmmmmmmmm
I'm looking now.
Check out rams cards under.
Love under 48.5
The only reason 49ers didnt cover was injuries. You cant account for that, it was a great pick!I used to think that this weekend was a prime let down spot for SF - given the way CLE is playing and injuries... SF is going to destroy them. Maybe that is a crazy naive take, but I don't think so.
I hope you're right. Laid the -5 on Tuesday, had a feeling that # was including Watson in the lineup and I had a feeling he might not play. Something is really off with that whole situation.
I find it interesting that sometimes the worse the line gets, the more confident I am in my pick. What I mean by that is, when I saw the 49ers open at just -4 on Monday, my reaction was, “Trap game. Vegas knows something, that line is too good to be true”, and I wasn’t going to touch that game. Now that the 49ers are -9.5, I feel like they probably cover it easily.
The Colts last week is another example. I loved the Colts early in the week when they were -1.5. I actually was much less confident with that pick once the line moved, and they were actually getting 2.5 points. (Fortunately I went with them anyway).
Bills -3.5 right now after halftime. bang that ****!