Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Have any comments on your incorrect math? And I highly doubt that the people of Nebraska want private messages between mother and daughter on facebook to be the impetus for a criminal case against a teenager for having an abortion
It will eventually hit home as someone they care about is going to "rot in jail for a very long time", but it will take a while before the abstract notion that we should punish murderers becomes the sick reality of locking up significant number of our mothers and daughters and sisters. Not to mention those that get the "death penalty" from complications of their home grown solutions. It will take a while before the realization is that choice is mostly NOT between saving the baby and losing the baby, but between losing just the baby or losing both the baby and the mother and possibly others. The immoral choice being made by these guys is because they and so many others accept the false premise. It will take time to get past that. And some won't ever get it. And some won't ever care.
Any school kid should grasp that there are 26 weeks in any 6 month period give or take a day or two. No matter how it was reported.
No.
We can agree that it was not a 5 or 6 month old baby. How about that?
I want to know why we would call it a puppy if it was a human as well.
Why do some men call themselves women and vice versa?
I'm okay with you guys calling it a baby, and I'm okay with respecting the wishes of the fetus if it were to communicate that it wants to be known as "5-months-old". Just like fetus, or baby if you prefer has every right to stand its ground and exercise everything that it can to defend its right to life.
So... what's he saying? I watched the clip and struggled to come up with a different understanding.
So you agree that is what the politician is saying?
Gonna need some context here buddy. No idea what you are talking about
My SIL called my wife yesterday asking some questions about methotrexate as my niece takes it for an autoimmune issue. She went to go get the monthly prescription filled and was presented a BUNCH of questions. Pharmacist, initially, didn't want to fill the Rx because apparently, the drug can also be used as an abortion drug. This was in SC where such rules don't even exist (yet). Went googling about this and found a bunch of instances where cancer patients, autoimmune patients, Chrones patients etc have been denied the drugs out of fear of prosecution by the state for giving out "abortion drugs". Had no idea this was going on.
Inevitable conclusion to this lunacy and our lovely new culture of threat of lawsuits for anybody aiding this process in any way.
I think a very reasonable inference can be drawn based on the bold that he's suggesting his state eliminate child support because otherwise "thugs" may be incentivize to coerce women into having abortions.
I read what he says and my objective takeaway remains the same as the title of the article. And I'm certainly not lying when I say that.
I literally bolded it above. And explained that a reader may draw a reasonable inference from his (somewhat incoherent) statements. Obviously we can't jump inside his minds and he didn't verbatim say "let's get rid of child support."
That will get absolutely ignored in threads like this one unfortunately. Not a lot of honest discussion to be had in here.
Pharmacist can choose to fill what they want. Go find another pharmacist.
Thanks for illustrating my point, but I'm more in favor of the "fix the problem" approach over the "play with the symptoms" approach
The bold doesn't end the analysis, however. How is this baby going to possibly survive with a 16 year old mother? 16 year old cannot financially provide for themselves let alone an infant. I assume then you're for significant liberal programs to utilize tax dollars to help this mother and child since she had no other option but to have it?
Dog caught the car
Abortion should be between the pregnant woman, her family, and her doctor is a reasonable solution to abortion. In fact, for reasons stated several times in this and other threads this is the only reasonable solution. Though there are ways to set this up such that it looks like a compromise to those that think government can effectively have a say as they timely, quickly rubber stamp.
On the issue of abortion itself, most Democrats, like most Americans, want abortion to be legal at least in the early-middle stages of pregnancy. As for whether the right cutoff is 15 weeks or 24 weeks or whatever, different Democrats, like different Americans, will have different preferences.
On a side note, in the pharmaceutical industry, there is vast, humungous, astronomical money in the cure.
Just like it wasn't a compromise when he tried the same thing for 20 weeks a while back.
So no different than the previous "compromises" that the unreasonable democrats rejected.
Trying to ban what should be the least objectionable of all abortions. And those where time is most of the essence,
