Why would anyone count the Colts out?It'll be an interesting game for sure. I'm by no means counting the Colts out here
In my case I might have counted them out because of really poor play the past two weeks.FUBAR said:Why would anyone count the Colts out?msommer said:It'll be an interesting game for sure. I'm by no means counting the Colts out here
if they were playing a top team, okay.In my case I might have counted them out because of really poor play the past two weeks.FUBAR said:Why would anyone count the Colts out?msommer said:It'll be an interesting game for sure. I'm by no means counting the Colts out here
Andre had zeroLouis Murphy started for Evans
Hartline started for Browns
Both had zero catches
HiIs Antonio Andrews related to you or something?Hoping for Delanie and Andrews to practice today
He is not a top 60 NFL back - much less a starter in this league.
...but I'll be very happy to be wrong here.Season?Mariota projections?
Here's my completely unqualified and optomistic guess:
3,000/20 passing
400/4 rushing
In a non-Whis situation, that performance would have earned him more snaps going forward.Snap count
https://twitter.com/jwyattsports/status/648486645818241024
Andrews very impressive at just 27% of snaps/22 plays, I thought it was more.
Even my projection was laughably low:...but I'll be very happy to be wrong here.Season?Mariota projections?
Here's my completely unqualified and optomistic guess:
3,000/20 passing
400/4 rushing
I'll take the over on passing yards (3200-3400).
It's my understanding that, per the CBA, teams are not permitted to practice during their bye. It's essentially a one-week suspension (vacation) for everyone.I predict the bye is used to get some DGB work in and have him much more involved in week 5 and onward
oh you may be right.It's my understanding that, per the CBA, teams are not permitted to practice during their bye. It's essentially a one-week suspension (vacation) for everyone.I predict the bye is used to get some DGB work in and have him much more involved in week 5 and onward
Mid to end of camp, it was Fowler jumbo back, McCluster 3rd down back, Andrews GL back, RBBC on 1st or 2nd and sticking with "hot hand."Guys from TN - Looking for some insight. I am a Sankey owner and thought the Marriota addition was really going to open up running lanes this year for him. Not seeming to be the case. Now we have Andrews emerging and Cobb returning at some point soon and while I am ok with an RBBC there, I really thought Sankey would have the leg up and first dibs on the lead role in the RBBC. After week 1, I thought he did nothing to change that. Now, it appears to me that roles are being defined and it is starting to look like they are transforming Sankey into a passing down, 3rd down back and looking for Antonio or Cobb to the main banger and probably GL back. This seems to be a week to week (think NE) gamescript type of thing imo going forward. Do you TN people agree? If so, then I think Sankey will have value just figure good luck trying to know which week is "his" week. Anyone think pro/con to my thought process on the TN backfield here? Thanks!
Leinart was going to suck no matter who coached him.Every year on bye week, MCM does a poll to gauge "approval rating" of the HC.
Whisenhunt poll http://www.musiccitymiracles.com/2015/9/30/9422947/ken-whisenhunt-approval-poll
It's quite positive, but the comments are not really. Very few positive comments.
On thin ice still I guess.
Always amazes me how everyone can remember he coached Big Ben but not Leinart.
Says you and plenty of people in hindsight but not before the draft. Guy was gonna give up his time in Hollywood to play gamesLeinart was going to suck no matter who coached him.Every year on bye week, MCM does a poll to gauge "approval rating" of the HC.
Whisenhunt poll http://www.musiccitymiracles.com/2015/9/30/9422947/ken-whisenhunt-approval-poll
It's quite positive, but the comments are not really. Very few positive comments.
On thin ice still I guess.
Always amazes me how everyone can remember he coached Big Ben but not Leinart.