got to respect his work and not give it away.Can anyone post Waldan's write up on him from the RSP? I'd love to see what he saw in him then.
Certainly looks encouraging. What worries me however is Bridgewater's inaccuracy. I'm seeing a WR with 20+ FF pts per week potential who will get maybe 5 most nights because his QB can't get him the ball when he's open.Here's the coaches film vs. KC. Yeah, Diggs is filthy.
Yah man. Rookie WR that went off for two weeks, with nothing scary in front of him (including Wallace). If Davante Parker was out there, and did this, people would be freaking. He's a true sleeper, and maybe a lot of people missed the boat. Go get him.Would you have used your #1 WW on ODB last year?
He's accurate because he's risk averse. He has a slow release & takes a lot of sacks. Doesn't really bail out & run unless there is an open lane. The Vikings are 32nd in net yards per attempt and 31st in attempts. The volume is limited in this offense.Bridgewater currently has a 64.4 completion percentage which is 16th overall in the NFL right now.
Accuracy as well as pocket presence are generally considered strengths of Teddy Bridgewater.
Two of Bridgewaters interceptions have been near the end zone and he hasn't thrown many TD but he is pretty accurate.
The Vikings run the ball a lot limiting volume in the passing game. The Vikings have also been playing well enough on defense that the offense doesn't need to push the envelope as much.
perfect! Thanks mangot to respect his work and not give it away.Can anyone post Waldan's write up on him from the RSP? I'd love to see what he saw in him then.
Ranked him #17 WR predraft. Concerns about his ball security and physicality. Praised his quick twitch, hand eye coordination and creativity.
Post draft, didn't really move the needle for Matt. Stated "enough talent to develop into an all around threat". Also warned he would be competing with Wright.
What concerned me having held him in a devy league for a few years was his draft round and the subsequent extension given to Wright (drafted him in the 3rd and 4th round of dynasty rookie drafts after the NFL draft)
Going forward, it would be ball security. I think the injury prone label is not fair, but YMMV
Yeah as long as the defense can keep playing well and limiting other teams from scoring I would expect the Vikings to keep slow rolling on offense and using up most of the play clock. There are a few times where Teddy will shift to a hurry up mode but I saw more of this last season than I have so far this season.BobbyLayne said:He's accurate because he's risk averse. He has a slow release & takes a lot of sacks. Doesn't really bail out & run unless there is an open lane. The Vikings are 32nd in net yards per attempt and 31st in attempts. The volume is limited in this offense.Biabreakable said:Bridgewater currently has a 64.4 completion percentage which is 16th overall in the NFL right now.
Accuracy as well as pocket presence are generally considered strengths of Teddy Bridgewater.
Two of Bridgewaters interceptions have been near the end zone and he hasn't thrown many TD but he is pretty accurate.
The Vikings run the ball a lot limiting volume in the passing game. The Vikings have also been playing well enough on defense that the offense doesn't need to push the envelope as much.
Love Diggs ability to get separation in the short passing game. That's right in Teddys wheelhouse. His speed is decent but just average for an NFL WR. His other combine numbers are average - he's not a gifted athlete. But he's one of those guys who looks better in pads on game day with the ball in his hands.
Incidentally, that's the same description back in 2011 when he was the #2 WR recruit in the country. His college was a disappointment after his freshman year. He didn't "test well" after he came out. That's why he was a 5th rounder. But when you see him on the field, it's obvious he can lose people in a hurry.
apples and oranges.Texican said:Would you have used your #1 WW on ODB last year?
Or Snead, for that matter? Trying to get a sense of where people think Diggs season-long value nets out to other WRs who have shown flashes.Would you cut Hankerson to get Diggs in a PPR? (yeah, yeah, AC forum and all that...)
Interesting to me that his NFL draft profile said he must prove he can win with route running, to me that looks like the best part of his game. Very encouraging that a predraft weakness seems to be a strength just two games into his career.WEAKNESSES Most of his production came from slot or as outside receiver in space. Must prove he can win as route runner against quality cornerbacks. Play strength is below par. Gets muscled around by physical defenders. Very aware of oncoming traffic and will stop routes to avoid big hits. Gives moderate effort as a blocker, but rarely ends up getting his man blocked. Had season-ending injuries two years in a row (broken leg and lacerated kidney). Suspended one game for his actions in pregame dustup vs. Penn State.
I understand what you're saying as Diggs does not have the kind of measurables or freakish size/athleticism combo of many of the recent stars and prospects at the WR position.BobbyLayne said:Love Diggs ability to get separation in the short passing game. That's right in Teddys wheelhouse. His speed is decent but just average for an NFL WR. His other combine numbers are average - he's not a gifted athlete. But he's one of those guys who looks better in pads on game day with the ball in his hands.Incidentally, that's the same description back in 2011 when he was the #2 WR recruit in the country. His college was a disappointment after his freshman year. He didn't "test well" after he came out. That's why he was a 5th rounder. But when you see him on the field, it's obvious he can lose people in a hurry.
I thought I was pretty clear since i prefaced the statement with "his combine numbers" and mentioned in the follow up paragraph he didn't "test well."I understand what you're saying as Diggs does not have the kind of measurables or freakish size/athleticism combo of many of the recent stars and prospects at the WR position.BobbyLayne said:Love Diggs ability to get separation in the short passing game. That's right in Teddys wheelhouse. His speed is decent but just average for an NFL WR. His other combine numbers are average - he's not a gifted athlete. But he's one of those guys who looks better in pads on game day with the ball in his hands.Incidentally, that's the same description back in 2011 when he was the #2 WR recruit in the country. His college was a disappointment after his freshman year. He didn't "test well" after he came out. That's why he was a 5th rounder. But when you see him on the field, it's obvious he can lose people in a hurry.
And maybe it's a matter of semantics, but I've been watching Diggs since HS and his athleticism has always stood out on the field. His body control, quickness- especially getting in and out of his breaks, hip fluidity, ability to change direction at full speed, and ability to seperate from people with game speed are all exceptional IMO.
I think he is most certainly a gifted athlete whose abilities stand out, even in a league full of other gifted athletes.
I thought I was pretty clear as well in stating that I understood what you were saying and know that Diggs' combine measurables are not elite.There's nothing exceptional about his natural ability.
Similar things were said about Antonio Brown, which is why he was picked in the 6th. Body control and the ability to make all your routes look the same, prior to the stem, is what matters as a WR--as long as you have adequate speed, size, and quickness which he does.I thought I was pretty clear as well in stating that I understood what you were saying and know that Diggs' combine measurables are not elite.But I disagree with the above. Not all athleticism is captured in timed drills. Diggs body control, fluidity, and quickness in pads all display exceptional natural ability IMO.There's nothing exceptional about his natural ability.
As I said before I saw him play in HS in one of the more heavily recruited leagues in the country. I watched him play in college against future NFL players. And his athleticism on the field has always stood out.
You were right it is semantics. Nothing worse than trying to argue from the same side, just a waste of calories.I thought I was pretty clear as well in stating that I understood what you were saying and know that Diggs' combine measurables are not elite.There's nothing exceptional about his natural ability.
But I disagree with the above. Not all athleticism is captured in timed drills. Diggs body control, fluidity, and quickness in pads all display exceptional natural ability IMO.
As I said before I saw him play in HS in one of the more heavily recruited leagues in the country. I watched him play in college against future NFL players. And his athleticism on the field has always stood out.
When I saw AB as a Freshman in college, I was immediately impressed with his agility and explosive quickness. They tried to get his hands on the ball in any way possible - returns, reverses, bubble screens, quick slants.Similar things were said about Antonio Brown, which is why he was picked in the 6th. Body control and the ability to make all your routes look the same, prior to the stem, is what matters as a WR--as long as you have adequate speed, size, and quickness which he does.I thought I was pretty clear as well in stating that I understood what you were saying and know that Diggs' combine measurables are not elite.But I disagree with the above. Not all athleticism is captured in timed drills. Diggs body control, fluidity, and quickness in pads all display exceptional natural ability IMO.There's nothing exceptional about his natural ability.
As I said before I saw him play in HS in one of the more heavily recruited leagues in the country. I watched him play in college against future NFL players. And his athleticism on the field has always stood out.
Just checked MyFBG section and Diggs is ranked in the 50s among WRs ROS in PPR. Not sure I understand that one.Amazing to see how low every site has him ranked this week and ROS. Still seeing low projections this week - EVERY X-spurt I've checked has Golden Tate ranked higher - while ROS he's listed as WR5/WR6, e.g., rosterable but not startable.
The herd is missing out on this one.
He has no touchdowns yet. That's a biggie in fantasy. He's definitely more valuable in PPR than in standard. He can have numerous 6 catch/100 yard games and he'll start inching up the rankings. But throw in a touchdown to that 6 for 100, and people will open their eyes. A 10 point game is nice. But 16 or more is a difference maker.Just checked MyFBG section and Diggs is ranked in the 50s among WRs ROS in PPR. Not sure I understand that one.Amazing to see how low every site has him ranked this week and ROS. Still seeing low projections this week - EVERY X-spurt I've checked has Golden Tate ranked higher - while ROS he's listed as WR5/WR6, e.g., rosterable but not startable.
The herd is missing out on this one.
FBGs has these folks ranked ahead of him ROS:Just checked MyFBG section and Diggs is ranked in the 50s among WRs ROS in PPR. Not sure I understand that one.Amazing to see how low every site has him ranked this week and ROS. Still seeing low projections this week - EVERY X-spurt I've checked has Golden Tate ranked higher - while ROS he's listed as WR5/WR6, e.g., rosterable but not startable.
The herd is missing out on this one.
He scored 15.9 without a TD in my standard scoring league this week.He has no touchdowns yet. That's a biggie in fantasy. He's definitely more valuable in PPR than in standard. He can have numerous 6 catch/100 yard games and he'll start inching up the rankings. But throw in a touchdown to that 6 for 100, and people will open their eyes. A 10 point game is nice. But 16 or more is a difference maker.Just checked MyFBG section and Diggs is ranked in the 50s among WRs ROS in PPR. Not sure I understand that one.Amazing to see how low every site has him ranked this week and ROS. Still seeing low projections this week - EVERY X-spurt I've checked has Golden Tate ranked higher - while ROS he's listed as WR5/WR6, e.g., rosterable but not startable.
The herd is missing out on this one.
Do you expect him to outperform Wallace?Waived Corey Brown for him in my PPR early this morning. Last on waiver priority, no one else made a claim...
Diggs scored an 11 week 4, and 15 last week in my leagues scoring. Couldn't pass him up even though I have Wallace on bench also.
Yeah, I cut Baldwin to pick up Diggs in one league. I was surprised to see that FBG thinks I apparently made a bad decision.FBGs has these folks ranked ahead of him ROS:Just checked MyFBG section and Diggs is ranked in the 50s among WRs ROS in PPR. Not sure I understand that one.Amazing to see how low every site has him ranked this week and ROS. Still seeing low projections this week - EVERY X-spurt I've checked has Golden Tate ranked higher - while ROS he's listed as WR5/WR6, e.g., rosterable but not startable.
The herd is missing out on this one.
Cole Beasley
Rueben Randle
Terrance Williams
Danny Amendola
Doug Baldwin
Ted Ginn
Not enough love being shown for these videos. Best posts in the whole message board. Thanks so much for sharing these!!Here's the coaches film vs. KC. Yeah, Diggs is filthy.
12.9 in mine. And 8.7 the week before. Would like to see him find the end zone. Debating starting him over Jordan Matthews, but think JMatt has a better chance of scoring.He scored 15.9 without a TD in my standard scoring league this week.He has no touchdowns yet. That's a biggie in fantasy. He's definitely more valuable in PPR than in standard. He can have numerous 6 catch/100 yard games and he'll start inching up the rankings. But throw in a touchdown to that 6 for 100, and people will open their eyes. A 10 point game is nice. But 16 or more is a difference maker.Just checked MyFBG section and Diggs is ranked in the 50s among WRs ROS in PPR. Not sure I understand that one.Amazing to see how low every site has him ranked this week and ROS. Still seeing low projections this week - EVERY X-spurt I've checked has Golden Tate ranked higher - while ROS he's listed as WR5/WR6, e.g., rosterable but not startable.
The herd is missing out on this one.
I kinda do, but not totally sure. Didn't want to miss this boat if it sails though. Brown was more expendable. I can drop Wallace for some other flavor later if Diggs takes over WR1 in Minny. (I hope...)Do you expect him to outperform Wallace?Waived Corey Brown for him in my PPR early this morning. Last on waiver priority, no one else made a claim...
Diggs scored an 11 week 4, and 15 last week in my leagues scoring. Couldn't pass him up even though I have Wallace on bench also.
Well ok it was KC but he was uncoverable in that game.Not enough love being shown for these videos. Best posts in the whole message board. Thanks so much for sharing these!!Here's the coaches film vs. KC. Yeah, Diggs is filthy.
Diggs!!
That's that he has no TD's yet in terms of acquisition timing/price consideration. Last week or two was the acquire cheap week. This week was the, "Oh thank goodness he didn't score so I can still possibly get him for a hopefully non-insane amount of FAAB" week. If he gets 5/75+ this week, the talking heads on ESPN/CBS will talk him up as a sleeper pickup, and you won't acquire before week 8 because some rube in every league will think it's "sharp" with TD's coming after the targets/yards. TD this week combined with targets/yards and every pundit on earth will proclaim him the second coming and you won't be able to get him.He has no touchdowns yet. That's a biggie in fantasy. He's definitely more valuable in PPR than in standard. He can have numerous 6 catch/100 yard games and he'll start inching up the rankings. But throw in a touchdown to that 6 for 100, and people will open their eyes. A 10 point game is nice. But 16 or more is a difference maker.Just checked MyFBG section and Diggs is ranked in the 50s among WRs ROS in PPR. Not sure I understand that one.Amazing to see how low every site has him ranked this week and ROS. Still seeing low projections this week - EVERY X-spurt I've checked has Golden Tate ranked higher - while ROS he's listed as WR5/WR6, e.g., rosterable but not startable.
The herd is missing out on this one.
Same here man, except I bid $41 which I thought might be excessive relative to other bids. Happy to have him in the league I need him the most but bummed I missed out on him in the other. His story is out there widely at this point.If your bids for the guy haven't gone through, just a word of warning. I didn't think that anybody was nearly as high on this guy in my league as I am. I bid $9 thinking that I could sneak him through. The winner bid $45. FORTY FIVE.
Open your wallets if you want this guy. Or else. :(
The problem I have when mentioning Diggs with names like Brown and Cobb is that he isn't on a team that will give him opportunities like those guys. Now I realize you're not suggesting that he'll eventually be Brown-like studly, but even if he becomes the true number 1 on the Vikings, he's not going to have the same chance to score points as though he were in Pittsburgh or Green Bay. Yes, buying now or last week may still constitute a value purchase, but I'm not expecting this guy's stock to rise to uber-stud status anytime soon. Of course, I hope I'm wrong.This feels eerily similar to the Antonio Brown/Randall Cobb inch ups to potential bust through the bricks breakouts both had in years past before being considered locked-in WR1's. Not saying it will happen exactly the same for Diggs because both of those guys are elite WR1's since breakout, save the 2015 respective situations. But, what I think is similar is that in their respective inch-ups from the waiver wire/low draft round status you had talent target/reception/yardage creeps in both guys leading up to the every week start/must have status, and your window got progressively smaller over those weeks to acquire from a snake or FAAB FA perspective. I think Diggs is trending similarly from a price check perspective, this was my all-in week with these two as examples in hindsight across redraft/keeper leagues.