bostonfred
Footballguy
Wow. I don't see it that way at all. I'll give you Jackson/Edge, although I have very little confidence in Edge as a stud RB.Very Serious...for comparisonSteven Jackson / Edge - PushSeriously? You have one starting running back, and he's the Arizona back.RB: James 9, Rhodes 6, Moats 9, Turner 3, Suggs 6, Griffin 3 - If Rhodes wins the starting job, this will be an impressive group. I expect Moats to get carries after what he showed last year. I think you'll see more carries for Turner and Griffin as the coaches try to reduce the wear on LT and LJ. Hoping Suggs can win a 3rd down back job. I really only need one of 5 to contribute each week and I'll be fine at RB. B
Jamal Lewis / Rhodes - Both will likely split time. Rookie in Indy = MA in Balt. Indy by far the superior offense. Push.
Cedric Houston / Moats&Turner - Martin will be back. Don't see much separation here.
Jerious Norwood / Suggs - Suggs has more talent. Opportunity for either???
Stephen Davis / Griffin - Both dark horses, mine is on a roster that has the most prolific rushing offense in the league.
Being able to trot out 6 backs every week compensates for a lack of quality. You scored your backs as a "B" and I see mine being on par with yours.
I can't give you Lewis/Rhodes, though. I don't see Lewis splitting time, so much as being the lead back in a power back offense.
Rhodes, on the other hand, is #2 on the depth chart after a player to be named later. I think you're underestimating the impact of "rookie in Indy". Of course, if Indy doesn't draft a rookie, then I'd put Rhodes well ahead of Lewis. But that's a big gamble for your RB2.
As for the rest of them, all of them need opportunity. I'd put Houston's opportunity well ahead of Moats or Turner, neither of whom has a chance of unseating their incumbent. I'd put Suggs well ahead of Norwood in terms of opportunity, but Suggs hasn't proven himself to be even a bye week contributer as a backup in Crennell's team - 8 rushes for 15 yards with another 6 catches for 26 on the season.
All in all, you have a bunch of guys who could be good starters if things fall into place. I have two guys who are starters, a third competing for the starting job, and a couple of shots in the dark.
I'm not trying to be critical of your team - I think you have a very solid team around those backs. I just think the one area of weakness on your team is at running back.