Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Obviously it would have to be fast acting.I'm not talking about this nonsense where you have to take it every day for like 8 years and then you miss one day and you are screwed.Pop it in, wait 15 minutes and it works. No actaul sperm in the semen (or however it works).Hell, you could make a combo pill of Cialis and this. :boatloads:
Knives and my ####. Two great tastes that don't taste great together.Besides, who knows when I'll need another male heir because the current one isn't panning out.
:mansion:
what about broads who lie and try to trap you? I prefer total coverage.
wrap it up.
We are going backwards here people.
It's not like they know my real name anyway.
Been there, done that.
If she's going to lie to you about being on the pill, who knows what else she's lying to you about. Wrap it up to protect yourself against the stuff the pills won't.
They've got a shot for most of that stuff anyway.
Really. This pill would be great. Women would hate it, an extra benefit.
What means this?
I'm still not sure what you mean. That women would continue to insist on more visible means of birth control? That's probably true but the real benefits to this method are removing control of reproductive issues from solely women. A man could take the pill, tell women whatever made them happy and be free from the worries of accidental/manipulated impregnation.
The point is not that you never want kids, but you don't want them with the chick you're banging. I think it's a great idea as long as there are no weird side effects. This article says that it's on the way.
Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding...we have a winner folks.
See I was thinking it would have to somehow pinch tubes closed and whatnot with artificial swelling. Painful explodings would undoubtedly ensue.
You'd start to get so backed up that you could get someone pregnant with your tears.
Good news indeed. If the original pill had the kind of impact on social behavior as scientists have said, this one will have an even potentially greater effect. Men controlling the rate of reproduction will change society as we know it.
Doesn't the ejaculate contain mostly seminal fluid with no DNA? And isn't the DNA portion injected by the Vas Deferens? If you can create an anti-histamine to stop mucous, then why can't you do the same thing with this?
WTF are you talking about?
He wouldn't want blanks, haha.
:runstopatentoffice:We'll probably put the medicine from the shot in the pill toMG
I'm not saying it can't be done, and I could've sworn I heard that there already was a "male pill", but I am saying that there is no natural, normal mechanism by which a man temporarily becomes infertile (that i know of).When women become pregnant, their bodies start producing different levels of hormones that tells their body to stop ovulating. It's the basis for some pregnancy tests, it's how lots of birth control works (simulating pregnant hormone levels), and it's simply the natural result of a woman getting pregnant.The man never gets pregnant, and there isn't any natural mechanism that occurs in life that's similar that can be manipulated. That's why I'd worry about any male pill...heck, even the female pills have some serious health risks, and they're probably closer to nature than anything the male pill could achieve.
They haven't invented an on/off switch yet though.
I'm going to go on record and say that an injection into my junk is a less attractive option than a pill.
No more chicks trying to get pregnant to trap a man.
