oooooooo yeaaa...thats right, that was Beckum who made that transition.Beckum came to UW as highly coveted LB. He went to the coaches and asked to be moved so he could get on the field, UW was loaded at LB and he was not getting on the field.Kendricks was recruited to play WR and had an offer from Miami, FL. Landing Kendricks was huge for the Badgers as he was friends with Clay. Kendricks was a big WR coming in as a freshman and it was talked about early that he might move to TE due to his athletic ability. Former Badger Owen Daniels came in as QB only to leave and become a Pro Bowl TE.Henkdricks will be good backup TE this year. McDaniel will use him to create match up problems that he can win.Threat of Jackson running will be key to Hendricks he is great at running short routes across the middle behind LBs.He actually went to Wisconsin as a linebacker Prospect and they switched him to Tight end after they saw how much he bulked up. Just like Beckum, Kendricks is another reliable pass-catching option prospect out of wisconsin, id say they have about the same skills, Kendricks has more athleticism. I think what all this comes down to for tight ends is who has the quarterback, My money is on Bradford. My other money is that Kendricks is going to be a main target for him. Lets do the math:Bradford=stud Bradford+kendricks+a lot of passing in the offense = stud numbers for Kendricksgood point... he was formerly a WR, got bigger and blew up into TE size, but seems to have retained the movement skills of a smaller player...he will be a handful for LBs to cover... if he forces safety coverage, that will be a size mismatch, and bradford is very accurate.... From Kendricks Highlights, it seems like he absolutely flies when he gets going. Does anyone else see immense YAC potential for Kendricks or is it just me?
I'm not a mind reader.Hoss, slow down and think about his post, brother. He means as a backup TE on your fantasy team.
Where in his post did he indicate it was fantasy related? He's talking about how McDaniels will use him and that he will be a good backup TE. That's all I read from that.Hi Hoss, I read that to mean TE2 in FF as opposed to backup TE on the Rams?What makes you think he will be a backup? It's not like he has world beaters in front of him.Henkdricks will be good backup TE this year.
www.footballguys.comWhere in his post did he indicate it was fantasy related?Hi Hoss, I read that to mean TE2 in FF as opposed to backup TE on the Rams?What makes you think he will be a backup? It's not like he has world beaters in front of him.Henkdricks will be good backup TE this year.
That made no sense. We talk about usage of players on their real NFL team all the time in the shark pool. I sure as hell don't want to get into a pissing contest over such mundane things. I'm just saying if you mean for it to be fantasy related, state it. I guess if you read the post he was replying to you could read between the lines Anyway, back to the subject of Kendricks......www.footballguys.comWhere in his post did he indicate it was fantasy related?Hi Hoss, I read that to mean TE2 in FF as opposed to backup TE on the Rams?What makes you think he will be a backup? It's not like he has world beaters in front of him.Henkdricks will be good backup TE this year.
I don't think it is fair to say he didn't use Watson. Watson had 49/643/3 in 13 games as a third year player in McDaniels first official season as coordinator, Welker and Moss came in the next year.Remember he was the OC in pre-Moss/Welker years when Watson was one of the better receivers on the roster and McD did not utilize him.
I know I am going to be called a homer, but Kendricks should be getting the love.Rams WR situation is unknown with a bunch of solid players but no superstart. These guys could very easily be rotated around all season long. Right now Kendricks should be the starting TE and create a lot of chances for himself. You could say he is the one sure starting recieving threat for the Rams at this point.'Joe Bryant said:I always struggle with knowing how much the "regular" FF guy knows compared to the Shark Pool FF guy. But among people that watch this closely, there isn't a more hyped receiver so far than Kendricks. Nice article today from Bryan Burwell http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bryan-burwell/article_8c246708-1a9a-532a-97e2-fb0b45de1fac.html
J
'T with T said:I am not here to pat myself on the back but Im usually good at snatching stud tes before they are even on the radar.. A few years ago I heard Rodgers loved Finley and was saying how he was the best Redzone guy on the team and I picked him up before he even played a reg season game. I also picked up Gates years ago before he even played a game... This year I snagged Kendricks in almost every league that I could and absolutely love the guys potential, situation and what Im hearing from Camp. I believe he has 60-70 catch production with 800-900 yards and 8-9 tds as a rookie.. KENDRICKS=BEAST
For me it's more about the following factors:1) no true WR#1 on the team (common with many of the top receiving TEs historically)'Joe Bryant said:I always struggle with knowing how much the "regular" FF guy knows compared to the Shark Pool FF guy. But among people that watch this closely, there isn't a more hyped receiver so far than Kendricks. Nice article today from Bryan Burwell http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bryan-burwell/article_8c246708-1a9a-532a-97e2-fb0b45de1fac.html
J
Just want to put a little perspective here as a guy who reads the Post Dispatch online everyday. Burwell is not a good source for Rams news. Guy writes rah rah fluff pieces for a living and should be on the marketing payroll of the Rams and Cards. If you want objective opinions on the Rams you have to follow Miklasz. Jim Thomas and Jeff Gordon also do a creditable job. But Burwell? No.I know I am going to be called a homer, but Kendricks should be getting the love.Rams WR situation is unknown with a bunch of solid players but no superstart. These guys could very easily be rotated around all season long. Right now Kendricks should be the starting TE and create a lot of chances for himself. You could say he is the one sure starting recieving threat for the Rams at this point.'Joe Bryant said:I always struggle with knowing how much the "regular" FF guy knows compared to the Shark Pool FF guy. But among people that watch this closely, there isn't a more hyped receiver so far than Kendricks. Nice article today from Bryan Burwell http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bryan-burwell/article_8c246708-1a9a-532a-97e2-fb0b45de1fac.html
J
McDaniels loves to throw the ball but what happen in NE is minimal, Bellicheck runs that team. McDaniel had some input but not enough to change the game plan. NE also did not have an athletic TE like Kendricks during his time.
Wow, I guess we will see. I guess you don't see the athletic ability of Kendricks and the upside. That's your right, but you're dead wrong.Just want to put a little perspective here as a guy who reads the Post Dispatch online everyday. Burwell is not a good source for Rams news. Guy writes rah rah fluff pieces for a living and should be on the marketing payroll of the Rams and Cards. If you want objective opinions on the Rams you have to follow Miklasz. Jim Thomas and Jeff Gordon also do a creditable job. But Burwell? No.I know I am going to be called a homer, but Kendricks should be getting the love.Rams WR situation is unknown with a bunch of solid players but no superstart. These guys could very easily be rotated around all season long. Right now Kendricks should be the starting TE and create a lot of chances for himself. You could say he is the one sure starting recieving threat for the Rams at this point.'Joe Bryant said:I always struggle with knowing how much the "regular" FF guy knows compared to the Shark Pool FF guy. But among people that watch this closely, there isn't a more hyped receiver so far than Kendricks. Nice article today from Bryan Burwell http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bryan-burwell/article_8c246708-1a9a-532a-97e2-fb0b45de1fac.html
J
McDaniels loves to throw the ball but what happen in NE is minimal, Bellicheck runs that team. McDaniel had some input but not enough to change the game plan. NE also did not have an athletic TE like Kendricks during his time.
Kendrick, from what we've seen should be a decent value as TE2 in redraft and could surprise. OTOH McDaniels should put together one good season for a TE before we put our faith in what he says. This feels a lot like Martz last year telling us how good Olsen was and how they were gonna use him. Uh Huh. Just show us one year and then we can believe.
The bigger problem for me is the statement that Kendrick is better long term than Thomas. For dynasty purposes I think that is way off the mark. Even with a conservative Fox running the show in Denver, Thomas has top 5 upside where Kendrick projects to be a borderline #1. He can put up Heath Miller numbers this year and be a value drafted late but beyond that forget it.
Other fringe #1's that can be had around his ADP include M Lewis, Cook, Winslow and Celek. All of which are better gambles than Kendrick.
That's a pretty big qualifier in the last sentence. What do you have him projected for? I'll say 45/ 500/ 6 And I feel that's his ceiling. He's still a rook after all.For me it's more about the following factors:1) no true WR#1 on the team (common with many of the top receiving TEs historically)'Joe Bryant said:I always struggle with knowing how much the "regular" FF guy knows compared to the Shark Pool FF guy. But among people that watch this closely, there isn't a more hyped receiver so far than Kendricks. Nice article today from Bryan Burwell http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bryan-burwell/article_8c246708-1a9a-532a-97e2-fb0b45de1fac.html
J
2) Bradford is a prodigy and the real deal, one of only a handful of rookie QBs that put up his rookie numbers
3) McDaniels loves to pass the ball
4) The Rams only "big" endzone target
Even if you believe Kendricks is a mediocre talent you'd have to take the above into account.
I would not be surprised if he caught 80 balls this year, althought that's not what I have him projected for.
I have him projected at 64/720/6I project ranges, but the above is the weighted average.That's a pretty big qualifier in the last sentence. What do you have him projected for? I'll say 45/ 500/ 6 And I feel that's his ceiling. He's still a rook after all.
Everybody loves the new guys and that's ok. But he'll have his bumps along the way. The guys I mentioned are all acclimated to the NFL and missing the OTAs wont have as big an impact on them so I value them a little higher.Wow, I guess we will see. I guess you don't see the athletic ability of Kendricks and the upside. That's your right, but you're dead wrong.Just want to put a little perspective here as a guy who reads the Post Dispatch online everyday. Burwell is not a good source for Rams news. Guy writes rah rah fluff pieces for a living and should be on the marketing payroll of the Rams and Cards. If you want objective opinions on the Rams you have to follow Miklasz. Jim Thomas and Jeff Gordon also do a creditable job. But Burwell? No.I know I am going to be called a homer, but Kendricks should be getting the love.Rams WR situation is unknown with a bunch of solid players but no superstart. These guys could very easily be rotated around all season long. Right now Kendricks should be the starting TE and create a lot of chances for himself. You could say he is the one sure starting recieving threat for the Rams at this point.'Joe Bryant said:I always struggle with knowing how much the "regular" FF guy knows compared to the Shark Pool FF guy. But among people that watch this closely, there isn't a more hyped receiver so far than Kendricks. Nice article today from Bryan Burwell http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bryan-burwell/article_8c246708-1a9a-532a-97e2-fb0b45de1fac.html
J
McDaniels loves to throw the ball but what happen in NE is minimal, Bellicheck runs that team. McDaniel had some input but not enough to change the game plan. NE also did not have an athletic TE like Kendricks during his time.
Kendrick, from what we've seen should be a decent value as TE2 in redraft and could surprise. OTOH McDaniels should put together one good season for a TE before we put our faith in what he says. This feels a lot like Martz last year telling us how good Olsen was and how they were gonna use him. Uh Huh. Just show us one year and then we can believe.
The bigger problem for me is the statement that Kendrick is better long term than Thomas. For dynasty purposes I think that is way off the mark. Even with a conservative Fox running the show in Denver, Thomas has top 5 upside where Kendrick projects to be a borderline #1. He can put up Heath Miller numbers this year and be a value drafted late but beyond that forget it.
Other fringe #1's that can be had around his ADP include M Lewis, Cook, Winslow and Celek. All of which are better gambles than Kendrick.
So you think he could out perform 64/720/6? How high does your range go?I have him projected at 64/720/6I project ranges, but the above is the weighted average.That's a pretty big qualifier in the last sentence. What do you have him projected for? I'll say 45/ 500/ 6 And I feel that's his ceiling. He's still a rook after all.
My point is not with the established guys. Sure he will have his bumps, but the point of this thread was there really isn't anymore upside to Thomas as there is for Kendricks. His athletic ability was front and center last night and his upside is just as good and in my mind better than Julius Thomas. Throw in his situation and it's even better.Everybody loves the new guys and that's ok. But he'll have his bumps along the way. The guys I mentioned are all acclimated to the NFL and missing the OTAs wont have as big an impact on them so I value them a little higher.Wow, I guess we will see. I guess you don't see the athletic ability of Kendricks and the upside. That's your right, but you're dead wrong.Just want to put a little perspective here as a guy who reads the Post Dispatch online everyday. Burwell is not a good source for Rams news. Guy writes rah rah fluff pieces for a living and should be on the marketing payroll of the Rams and Cards. If you want objective opinions on the Rams you have to follow Miklasz. Jim Thomas and Jeff Gordon also do a creditable job. But Burwell? No.I know I am going to be called a homer, but Kendricks should be getting the love.Rams WR situation is unknown with a bunch of solid players but no superstart. These guys could very easily be rotated around all season long. Right now Kendricks should be the starting TE and create a lot of chances for himself. You could say he is the one sure starting recieving threat for the Rams at this point.'Joe Bryant said:I always struggle with knowing how much the "regular" FF guy knows compared to the Shark Pool FF guy. But among people that watch this closely, there isn't a more hyped receiver so far than Kendricks. Nice article today from Bryan Burwell http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bryan-burwell/article_8c246708-1a9a-532a-97e2-fb0b45de1fac.html
J
McDaniels loves to throw the ball but what happen in NE is minimal, Bellicheck runs that team. McDaniel had some input but not enough to change the game plan. NE also did not have an athletic TE like Kendricks during his time.
Kendrick, from what we've seen should be a decent value as TE2 in redraft and could surprise. OTOH McDaniels should put together one good season for a TE before we put our faith in what he says. This feels a lot like Martz last year telling us how good Olsen was and how they were gonna use him. Uh Huh. Just show us one year and then we can believe.
The bigger problem for me is the statement that Kendrick is better long term than Thomas. For dynasty purposes I think that is way off the mark. Even with a conservative Fox running the show in Denver, Thomas has top 5 upside where Kendrick projects to be a borderline #1. He can put up Heath Miller numbers this year and be a value drafted late but beyond that forget it.
Other fringe #1's that can be had around his ADP include M Lewis, Cook, Winslow and Celek. All of which are better gambles than Kendrick.
McDaniels has yet to produce a stud TE and that downgrades Kendrick a little more. Bradford's ability is the big reason we are even discussing a rook TE that could breakout. I'll give it a year.
I hate having this discussion because everybody flips out on this board...mostly because they don't understand the concept.So best case scenario I have the following high-end projection. I have the likelihood at roughly 5%So you think he could out perform 64/720/6? How high does your range go?I have him projected at 64/720/6I project ranges, but the above is the weighted average.That's a pretty big qualifier in the last sentence. What do you have him projected for?
I'll say 45/ 500/ 6 And I feel that's his ceiling. He's still a rook after all.
I have him stealing a lot of Amendolas redzone work, similar ceiling as yours, but less yards and possibly 10-11 TDsI hate having this discussion because everybody flips out on this board...mostly because they don't understand the concept.So best case scenario I have the following high-end projection. I have the likelihood at roughly 5%So you think he could out perform 64/720/6? How high does your range go?I have him projected at 64/720/6I project ranges, but the above is the weighted average.That's a pretty big qualifier in the last sentence. What do you have him projected for?
I'll say 45/ 500/ 6 And I feel that's his ceiling. He's still a rook after all.
78/1180/9
Well I wont flip out at a 5% chance of anything. Roughly 1 time in 20 a guy with this skill set in this situation will post these numbers. That's a pretty low probability. Almost unattainable.I hate having this discussion because everybody flips out on this board...mostly because they don't understand the concept.So best case scenario I have the following high-end projection. I have the likelihood at roughly 5%So you think he could out perform 64/720/6? How high does your range go?I have him projected at 64/720/6I project ranges, but the above is the weighted average.That's a pretty big qualifier in the last sentence. What do you have him projected for?
I'll say 45/ 500/ 6 And I feel that's his ceiling. He's still a rook after all.
78/1180/9
Leave it to Hipple to come late to the party.......ST. LOUIS — The difficulty in watching preseason football is that sometimes there's just too much activity for the untrained eye to follow.
Hi Hoss, I know you love the guy and I do too but in general, that's not the best way to encourage discussion on the topic. You've got way more to bring to the boards than that. (and if you weren't a good poster, I wouldn't even say anything)Thanks.Wow, I guess we will see. I guess you don't see the athletic ability of Kendricks and the upside. That's your right, but you're dead wrong.Just want to put a little perspective here as a guy who reads the Post Dispatch online everyday. Burwell is not a good source for Rams news. Guy writes rah rah fluff pieces for a living and should be on the marketing payroll of the Rams and Cards. If you want objective opinions on the Rams you have to follow Miklasz. Jim Thomas and Jeff Gordon also do a creditable job. But Burwell? No.I know I am going to be called a homer, but Kendricks should be getting the love.Rams WR situation is unknown with a bunch of solid players but no superstart. These guys could very easily be rotated around all season long. Right now Kendricks should be the starting TE and create a lot of chances for himself. You could say he is the one sure starting recieving threat for the Rams at this point.'Joe Bryant said:I always struggle with knowing how much the "regular" FF guy knows compared to the Shark Pool FF guy. But among people that watch this closely, there isn't a more hyped receiver so far than Kendricks. Nice article today from Bryan Burwell http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bryan-burwell/article_8c246708-1a9a-532a-97e2-fb0b45de1fac.html
J
McDaniels loves to throw the ball but what happen in NE is minimal, Bellicheck runs that team. McDaniel had some input but not enough to change the game plan. NE also did not have an athletic TE like Kendricks during his time.
Kendrick, from what we've seen should be a decent value as TE2 in redraft and could surprise. OTOH McDaniels should put together one good season for a TE before we put our faith in what he says. This feels a lot like Martz last year telling us how good Olsen was and how they were gonna use him. Uh Huh. Just show us one year and then we can believe.
The bigger problem for me is the statement that Kendrick is better long term than Thomas. For dynasty purposes I think that is way off the mark. Even with a conservative Fox running the show in Denver, Thomas has top 5 upside where Kendrick projects to be a borderline #1. He can put up Heath Miller numbers this year and be a value drafted late but beyond that forget it.
Other fringe #1's that can be had around his ADP include M Lewis, Cook, Winslow and Celek. All of which are better gambles than Kendrick.
As much as I love all Badgers, current and former, and as much as I disagree with most everything the Lhuck pitches, I have to agree with those numbers 64/720/6 as good projectionsI hate having this discussion because everybody flips out on this board...mostly because they don't understand the concept.So best case scenario I have the following high-end projection. I have the likelihood at roughly 5%So you think he could out perform 64/720/6? How high does your range go?I have him projected at 64/720/6I project ranges, but the above is the weighted average.That's a pretty big qualifier in the last sentence. What do you have him projected for?
I'll say 45/ 500/ 6 And I feel that's his ceiling. He's still a rook after all.
78/1180/9
I believe Kendricks has that same upper tier upside as Thomas, only he's closer to it than Thomas and he's in a better situation. Give me Kendricks regardless of league format.I'm not sure why Kendricks having a great camp has anything to do with Julius Thomas' dynasty prospects. They are both solid rookie picks with considerable upside. Until recently, you could get Julius Thomas in the 4th round of rookie drafts (or even off the waiver wire). Kendricks was routinely going in the late 2nd to mid 3rd.Given Julius' upside vs. current cost, I'd rather have him. You are most likely drafting one of these guys as your TE3 or TE4. And, in that case, I'd take the guy who has Top 3 upside in Thomas. When I'm drafting or trading for position depth (not starters), I evaluate the player, not the situation. STL vs. DEN doesn't even enter into my decision. Thomas is more raw than Kendricks, but has that upper tier difference making ability that I'd rather gamble on and groom from my bench.Point is....redraft I go Kendricks. Dynasty, gimme Thomas.
You're right Joe and I've been trying very hard not to come across that strong. I'll keep trying.Hi Hoss, I know you love the guy and I do too but in general, that's not the best way to encourage discussion on the topic. You've got way more to bring to the boards than that. (and if you weren't a good poster, I wouldn't even say anything)Thanks.Wow, I guess we will see. I guess you don't see the athletic ability of Kendricks and the upside. That's your right, but you're dead wrong.Just want to put a little perspective here as a guy who reads the Post Dispatch online everyday. Burwell is not a good source for Rams news. Guy writes rah rah fluff pieces for a living and should be on the marketing payroll of the Rams and Cards. If you want objective opinions on the Rams you have to follow Miklasz. Jim Thomas and Jeff Gordon also do a creditable job. But Burwell? No.I know I am going to be called a homer, but Kendricks should be getting the love.Rams WR situation is unknown with a bunch of solid players but no superstart. These guys could very easily be rotated around all season long. Right now Kendricks should be the starting TE and create a lot of chances for himself. You could say he is the one sure starting recieving threat for the Rams at this point.'Joe Bryant said:I always struggle with knowing how much the "regular" FF guy knows compared to the Shark Pool FF guy. But among people that watch this closely, there isn't a more hyped receiver so far than Kendricks. Nice article today from Bryan Burwell http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bryan-burwell/article_8c246708-1a9a-532a-97e2-fb0b45de1fac.html
J
McDaniels loves to throw the ball but what happen in NE is minimal, Bellicheck runs that team. McDaniel had some input but not enough to change the game plan. NE also did not have an athletic TE like Kendricks during his time.
Kendrick, from what we've seen should be a decent value as TE2 in redraft and could surprise. OTOH McDaniels should put together one good season for a TE before we put our faith in what he says. This feels a lot like Martz last year telling us how good Olsen was and how they were gonna use him. Uh Huh. Just show us one year and then we can believe.
The bigger problem for me is the statement that Kendrick is better long term than Thomas. For dynasty purposes I think that is way off the mark. Even with a conservative Fox running the show in Denver, Thomas has top 5 upside where Kendrick projects to be a borderline #1. He can put up Heath Miller numbers this year and be a value drafted late but beyond that forget it.
Other fringe #1's that can be had around his ADP include M Lewis, Cook, Winslow and Celek. All of which are better gambles than Kendrick.
J
Thanks. JYou're right Joe and I've been trying very hard not to come across that strong. I'll keep trying.Hi Hoss, I know you love the guy and I do too but in general, that's not the best way to encourage discussion on the topic. You've got way more to bring to the boards than that. (and if you weren't a good poster, I wouldn't even say anything)Thanks.Wow, I guess we will see. I guess you don't see the athletic ability of Kendricks and the upside. That's your right, but you're dead wrong.Just want to put a little perspective here as a guy who reads the Post Dispatch online everyday. Burwell is not a good source for Rams news. Guy writes rah rah fluff pieces for a living and should be on the marketing payroll of the Rams and Cards. If you want objective opinions on the Rams you have to follow Miklasz. Jim Thomas and Jeff Gordon also do a creditable job. But Burwell? No.I know I am going to be called a homer, but Kendricks should be getting the love.Rams WR situation is unknown with a bunch of solid players but no superstart. These guys could very easily be rotated around all season long. Right now Kendricks should be the starting TE and create a lot of chances for himself. You could say he is the one sure starting recieving threat for the Rams at this point.'Joe Bryant said:I always struggle with knowing how much the "regular" FF guy knows compared to the Shark Pool FF guy. But among people that watch this closely, there isn't a more hyped receiver so far than Kendricks. Nice article today from Bryan Burwell http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bryan-burwell/article_8c246708-1a9a-532a-97e2-fb0b45de1fac.html
J
McDaniels loves to throw the ball but what happen in NE is minimal, Bellicheck runs that team. McDaniel had some input but not enough to change the game plan. NE also did not have an athletic TE like Kendricks during his time.
Kendrick, from what we've seen should be a decent value as TE2 in redraft and could surprise. OTOH McDaniels should put together one good season for a TE before we put our faith in what he says. This feels a lot like Martz last year telling us how good Olsen was and how they were gonna use him. Uh Huh. Just show us one year and then we can believe.
The bigger problem for me is the statement that Kendrick is better long term than Thomas. For dynasty purposes I think that is way off the mark. Even with a conservative Fox running the show in Denver, Thomas has top 5 upside where Kendrick projects to be a borderline #1. He can put up Heath Miller numbers this year and be a value drafted late but beyond that forget it.
Other fringe #1's that can be had around his ADP include M Lewis, Cook, Winslow and Celek. All of which are better gambles than Kendrick.
J
it is indeed very rareOne thing to temper the enthusiasm, very few TE's have an impact their rookie season... Gronk and Hernandez did last year, but I think you can count the rest on one hand including those two...
However... How many started out being the 'star of camp' and then factored in quite a bit during the first preseason game, scoring the first TD?it is indeed very rareOne thing to temper the enthusiasm, very few TE's have an impact their rookie season... Gronk and Hernandez did last year, but I think you can count the rest on one hand including those two...
Ah yes, the famous last words, THIS time is different...However... How many started out being the 'star of camp' and then factored in quite a bit during the first preseason game, scoring the first TD?it is indeed very rareOne thing to temper the enthusiasm, very few TE's have an impact their rookie season... Gronk and Hernandez did last year, but I think you can count the rest on one hand including those two...
I wouldnt use the hype to measure it. But I think a better question to ask, is how long has been the shift in TEs been going on, less than 10 years? I think this year the position utilization will be changed forever. Having an every down utility player (or two) is just such a huge advantage if it can be pulled off.'bigmiiiiike said:Ah yes, the famous last words, THIS time is different...'FavreAndAwayAnIdiot said:However... How many started out being the 'star of camp' and then factored in quite a bit during the first preseason game, scoring the first TD?'LHUCKS said:it is indeed very rareOne thing to temper the enthusiasm, very few TE's have an impact their rookie season... Gronk and Hernandez did last year, but I think you can count the rest on one hand including those two...
I took the top 25 rookie TE seasons since 1985 in FPs and divided out their games played- the average is 4.37 FP/g. The best rookie outing was Keith Jackson with 7.68 fp/gBy comparison if you take the top 25 TE seasons of all experiences, the average is 10.14 FP/g. The best outing was Gates with 11.62 fp/gWhat does it mean? Well in 2010, TE12 was Pettigrew with 6.01 FP/g. So the worst starting TE is still better than the 'average' top rookie season, and scored 78% of the points of the best rookie outing of all time.I'd say Fanatic is statistically correct.One thing to temper the enthusiasm, very few TE's have an impact their rookie season... Gronk and Hernandez did last year, but I think you can count the rest on one hand including those two...
Is that PPR or not? Im thinking not based on the low PPG scores. Factoring the recpts back in changes things. What you have uncovered (and thank you for the work BTW ) is the impact at a difficult position to learn 1st year, and the lack of TD impact for rookie TE's.I took the top 25 rookie TE seasons since 1985 in FPs and divided out their games played- the average is 4.37 FP/g. The best rookie outing was Keith Jackson with 7.68 fp/gBy comparison if you take the top 25 TE seasons of all experiences, the average is 10.14 FP/g. The best outing was Gates with 11.62 fp/gWhat does it mean? Well in 2010, TE12 was Pettigrew with 6.01 FP/g. So the worst starting TE is still better than the 'average' top rookie season, and scored 78% of the points of the best rookie outing of all time.I'd say Fanatic is statistically correct.One thing to temper the enthusiasm, very few TE's have an impact their rookie season... Gronk and Hernandez did last year, but I think you can count the rest on one hand including those two...
Not really sure why you posted this here. You know JT has his own thread right?http://espn.go.com/blog/afcwest/post/_/id/30550/julius-thomas-speedy-transition
Julius Thomas' speedy transition
By Bill Williamson
ESPN.com
ENGLEWOOD, Co. -- Two summers ago, Julius Thomas was practicing his jump shot at Portland State.
Thursday night, he was at Cowboys’ Stadium, facing Dallas’ first-team defense.
“There was DeMarcus Ware, it was crazy,” Denver’s rookie tight end said Saturday of his first NFL game experience. “I had to calm myself down … I realized it was the highest level. If I could play at that level, I can make it.”
Thomas has been one of the stories of Denver’s camp. He was a fourth-round pick despite playing just year of college football and one year of high school football. Denver dedicated the valuable pick on the raw player because of his immense athletic ability and his ability to improve quickly. So far, the pick doesn’t appear to be a wasted one.
Thomas has shined at practices, becoming a red-zone favorite of quarterback Kyle Orton. Thomas is a getting a lot of action with the first team, which is an indication the transition hasn’t been difficult for him.
“I’m just here to learning,” Thomas said. “That's what it's all about for me. I just want to learn every day.”
If Thomas continues to progress, he will have a chance to play often in the regular season. He said his time with the first-team in camp has kept him on his toes.
“I you are practicing with the (third team) and you make a mistake, well, OK, you make a mistake,” Thomas said. “But if you make a mistake with the first team team, you have Kyle Orton or Brandon Lloyd on you. They are there to practice. They don’t have time for a rookie to make a mistake … the pressure is there to improve quickly.”
The Julius Thomas story is looking a lot like the Antonio Gates rookie story. Don't wait too long to get Thomas or you will miss out.
Newspaper Clipping #1 for Rookie Gates
Newspaper Clipping #2 for Rookie Gates (2nd to last bullet in column on left titled, "Report - The News in the National Football League")