He did fine as a filler for a week. At least this secures Blount.He's done. Was good while it lasted. He was a good flex spot for me tonight.
BB hates fumblers, at least Lewis has had a really good rest of the game and fumble was on an extra effort. Maybe BB will take that into consideration, this time.Fumbled near the goal line. Not good for Lewis.
Definitely would not be unprecedented for BB. Jonas Gray last year with 201 and 4TD's, then was late for a meeting and barely saw the field again. Something like that any way.Bolden immediately after the fumble. May not see Dion again.
Not saying this is wrong but Bolden is the big back and got the goal line carry early in the game as well so it likely wasn't largely due to the fumble. Now, how the rest of the game plays out may be a different story.Definitely would not be unprecedented for BB. Jonas Gray last year with 201 and 4TD's, then was late for a meeting and barely saw the field again. Something like that any way.Bolden immediately after the fumble. May not see Dion again.
He'll definitely be benched but I think he's too valuable to the passing game not to sniff the field again.BB hates fumblers, at least Lewis has had a really good rest of the game and fumble was on an extra effort. Maybe BB will take that into consideration, this time.Fumbled near the goal line. Not good for Lewis.
I completely agree. I don't think Lewis was taken out at the GL for the fumble. But I think his opportunities could definitely decrease because of it, and potentially by a great deal.Not saying this is wrong but Bolden is the big back and got the goal line carry early in the game as well so it likely wasn't largely due to the fumble. Now, how the rest of the game plays out may be a different story.Definitely would not be unprecedented for BB. Jonas Gray last year with 201 and 4TD's, then was late for a meeting and barely saw the field again. Something like that any way.Bolden immediately after the fumble. May not see Dion again.
Well he's losing a ton of snaps next week by default due to Blount's return. If anything, this opens the door for White more as the COP/3rd down back.I completely agree. I don't think Lewis was taken out at the GL for the fumble. But I think his opportunities could definitely decrease because of it, and potentially by a great deal.Not saying this is wrong but Bolden is the big back and got the goal line carry early in the game as well so it likely wasn't largely due to the fumble. Now, how the rest of the game plays out may be a different story.Definitely would not be unprecedented for BB. Jonas Gray last year with 201 and 4TD's, then was late for a meeting and barely saw the field again. Something like that any way.Bolden immediately after the fumble. May not see Dion again.
That was a bad pass and a very tough catch in a downpour. But it would have great for my score tonight.He could have really added this totals tonight if he caught that pass just now.
Just put him up on the trading block to see if anyone will bite.Honestly, I'd take Williams in that case. But overall, I think IF you are just sitting there and he's available...do it because its a long season and if he won the job and has a role, SOMEBODY out there, at some point, due to injuries or whatever are likely going to be interested in the Patriots' receiving RB because they are a high scoring team and its actually that variance and unpredictability that works FOR you becasuse while there are those out there who say "Ahh, it's this and that and who knows," there's also those out there who like to swing for the fences and think "Hey, I might luck out and get a Rb on a high scoring team and end up with a top 20 rb (ppr). Wasn't Vareen and Ridley both pretty valuable at different point?There isn't any if you have the room, I'm just saying the stigma is very real and could make him a tough player to move. I've been sitting here debating between him and Andre Williams for the past 30 mins myself but not because I expect to be able to trade him at any point this year.Well, that eliminates "part" of the people, but it keeps the door open for that other part. all you need is one to make a trade.Perceived value is in fact the problem here. Whether or not Lewis actually ends up holding any value is going to be irrelevant in the eyes of people who won't own a part of BB's backfield under any circumstance. I think Lewis may end up being good depth for teams in PPR but looking towards him as trade bait is incorrect.I think you have to look beyond that. It's not so much what do we expect in terms of production but what we expect in terms of perceived value.What do we expect from the passing down RB on a weekly basis
I could care less if a guy I am adding off the wire is a 6 point or 14 point guy, depending on the stars aligning correctly. I care about getting this guy on my roster and then generating value from him because I KNOW that there is somebody out there in my league that, at some point, is going to pay me for this guy.
What's the alternative? If you have an open spot or if you have someone you're ready to cut, what's the downside?
He looked good, thus, it will be the same old story with NE backs. Flip a coin as to which one will be startable.He'll only be a viable weekly starter in ppr leagues once Blount comes back. And even then he'll likely be too up and down. He's not going to sniff 1st and 2nd down work on running plays.
But he's a good bench player to have for bye weeks.
I think Lewis is more like Woodhead. Vereen's biggest limitation was he is a RB who isn't very good at running. Just never picked up much on the ground. But Lewis is more like Woodhead. Both can hit the hole and pick up yards and make guys miss. Vereen rarely made a guy miss. He's great at getting open and catching the ball and has wheels, but he's just getting what's there.Vereen was unstartable most of last year but had a few blow up games. I expect the same from Lewis
LOL. Sorry, Dion. An "x" slipped in there.loose circuits said:who is dixon?Shutout said:I think they are going to like the pace Dixon can play with and give them. I think he is that wood head role guy nowloose circuits said:looks explosive and great in passing game. Blount may actually open things up to smash them a few times before Dion runs around um
I can agree with that.I'm going to let other people blow their FAAB on this guy. Pats backfield is something I want nothing of. If he was a part of the Browns or Falcons backfield I would be going heavy on him.
No. Here is why this is different (and I probably won't explain it well so maybe some Pats fans can elaborate).He looked good, thus, it will be the same old story with NE backs. Flip a coin as to which one will be startable.He'll only be a viable weekly starter in ppr leagues once Blount comes back. And even then he'll likely be too up and down. He's not going to sniff 1st and 2nd down work on running plays.
But he's a good bench player to have for bye weeks.
agreed.It's all gameplan dependant.
On their schedule:^they played a horrible defense. There are still a ton of games where BB wants to pound the rock. It's all gameplan dependant.