SproutDaddy
Footballguy
That's cool and all, but Patterson will score more FF points this year.Mike Wallace is a better WR than Patterson right now.
That's cool and all, but Patterson will score more FF points this year.Mike Wallace is a better WR than Patterson right now.
I'll take Patterson and totally agree. He's could probably play RB in the NFL.Waldman says Patterson is the best non-RB open field runner he's ever seen.
I'll take Deion Sanders.
If Revis plays like he did last week covering Mike Wallace, Patterson will embarrass him.I love Patterson. His future is bright but if you have a decent WR on the bench this week I think you should sit him. He's just not that polished of a WR yet and if they have Revis shadow him 0 receptions is a possibility imo.
Right and if Wallace were actually better than Patterson, don't you think Revis would have shadowed him like they're suggesting he will Patterson this weekend?That's cool and all, but Patterson will score more FF points this year.Mike Wallace is a better WR than Patterson right now.
If we define "shadow" as "to follow behind", then that sounds about right to me.Someone explain to me how you can "shadow" a player who is utilized like Patterson?
I don't see how u can sit him in return yardage leagues honestly... 2-3 pts floor is like 2-3 catches in ppr no?I don't really get the return yardage argument. My league is 1 poitn per 25 yards. That's like 2-3 PPG. It's not that much of a boost in PPR considering he's not likely to be a target monster like either AJ, Calvin, Julio, etc.I think he can handle between 8-12 offensive touches per game, including 2-4 rushes. Unlikely to be his average, but that's his upside and it entails low-mid WR1 stats.
Add return yards and you're looking at a potential monster, considering he's the best and most active kick returner in the league.
Agreed. The days of sitting WRs because they're going up against Revis are gone. He's still very good, but not someone you want to be scared of starting your WR against.Revis is still good, but clearly not the guy he used to be. He can be beaten with speed as was shown a couple of times last week. I'll be starting Patterson with confidence, regardless if he's being "shadowed" or not.
The last 5 games haven't been enough?The next few games will be telling whether Patterson gets put into the "never bench your studs" category.
Maybe. I agree that NE will be more effective this week on O, which should add to CPs chances. Not to mention that since last year NE hasn't proven able to stop the run. If Moreno and Miller could run all over them, what are Peterson and Patterson going to do with their carries?People getting a bit too jacked up in here.
NE coming off a bad loss. Rarely lose two in a row. And Bill B. is usually very good at taking away weapons.
Not to mention he knows Cassel.
Think somewhat of a bust is coming this week.
And in general, he could be a little up and down this season with big weeks followed by duds but with performance evening out as the season goes on.
Temper expectations.
This is pretty much the tip of the iceberg...this guy is creating a pattern where he pretty much is a threat to score anytime he touches it. I doubt the Vikings coaches are dumb, they will make a more concerted effort to feature him for sure.Guys, it's pretty simple: if you own Patterson you are playing him, regardless of matchup (except maybe if he plays Seattle and even then he might be fine BC they will move him around the formation away from Sherman). The only wrs you should ever consider starting over this stud are the top guys like Calvin, Marshall, Nelson, Julio, DT, dez...
He is that good. And the Vikings coaches know it. When they get him involved the scoreboard always seems to light up. Play him.
Bill Belichick definitely can't tackle Cordarrelle Patterson.People getting a bit too jacked up in here.
NE coming off a bad loss. Rarely lose two in a row. And Bill B. is usually very good at taking away weapons.
Not to mention he knows Cassel.
Think somewhat of a bust is coming this week.
And in general, he could be a little up and down this season with big weeks followed by duds but with performance evening out as the season goes on.
Temper expectations.
If this is true, it's even more reason to keep him in your lineup. You never know which game will be the ones where he explodes and wins your matchup for you. Don't be one of the fools who has cp on their bench during one of those weeks.People getting a bit too jacked up in here.
NE coming off a bad loss. Rarely lose two in a row. And Bill B. is usually very good at taking away weapons.
Not to mention he knows Cassel.
Think somewhat of a bust is coming this week.
And in general, he could be a little up and down this season with big weeks followed by duds but with performance evening out as the season goes on.
Temper expectations.
Me too.werdnoynek said:The last 5 games haven't been enough?The next few games will be telling whether Patterson gets put into the "never bench your studs" category.
I think going back to the end of last season, he's shown enough as an all around play maker that he should be in your lineup if you have him. Another year under his belt and another electric performance in week 1, I think Norval is going to do whatever he can to get this kid the ball. Last week was probably an anomaly with the targets / receptions IMO. There just wasn't a need to pass the ball in the blowout. If you bench him, you're going to regret it IMO.
Yep, lucky for us though, this guy also gets carries and can take it to the house at any time!!!Me too.werdnoynek said:The last 5 games haven't been enough?The next few games will be telling whether Patterson gets put into the "never bench your studs" category.
I think going back to the end of last season, he's shown enough as an all around play maker that he should be in your lineup if you have him. Another year under his belt and another electric performance in week 1, I think Norval is going to do whatever he can to get this kid the ball. Last week was probably an anomaly with the targets / receptions IMO. There just wasn't a need to pass the ball in the blowout. If you bench him, you're going to regret it IMO.
Eventually, he'll have a quiet game, like EVERY OTHER wide receiver, and we'll see people in here calling him out.
Rarely being the key word. The Pats will lose this week. They will have no answer for our run game, and in turn our passing game will be better than expected. Patterson will have his highlights in the air or the ground or both.kyoun1e said:People getting a bit too jacked up in here.
NE coming off a bad loss. Rarely lose two in a row. And Bill B. is usually very good at taking away weapons.
Not to mention he knows Cassel.
Think somewhat of a bust is coming this week.
And in general, he could be a little up and down this season with big weeks followed by duds but with performance evening out as the season goes on.
Temper expectations.
Lol. Thanks for the unbiased analysis there.Rarely being the key word. The Pats will lose this week. They will have no answer for our run game, and in turn our passing game will be better than expected. Patterson will have his highlights in the air or the ground or both.kyoun1e said:People getting a bit too jacked up in here.
NE coming off a bad loss. Rarely lose two in a row. And Bill B. is usually very good at taking away weapons.
Not to mention he knows Cassel.
Think somewhat of a bust is coming this week.
And in general, he could be a little up and down this season with big weeks followed by duds but with performance evening out as the season goes on.
Temper expectations.
Ill see ya after the game, sucker.
No problem, sucker.Lol. Thanks for the unbiased analysis there.Rarely being the key word. The Pats will lose this week. They will have no answer for our run game, and in turn our passing game will be better than expected. Patterson will have his highlights in the air or the ground or both.kyoun1e said:People getting a bit too jacked up in here.
NE coming off a bad loss. Rarely lose two in a row. And Bill B. is usually very good at taking away weapons.
Not to mention he knows Cassel.
Think somewhat of a bust is coming this week.
And in general, he could be a little up and down this season with big weeks followed by duds but with performance evening out as the season goes on.
Temper expectations.
Ill see ya after the game, sucker.
I actually own C. Patterson myself so I hope I'm WRONG.
Also, your analysis was garbage. You didnt say anything. LOL- BB knows Cassel..? What does that mean? He hasnt played for NE in 6 years. Just a dumb statement.No problem, sucker.Lol. Thanks for the unbiased analysis there.Rarely being the key word. The Pats will lose this week. They will have no answer for our run game, and in turn our passing game will be better than expected. Patterson will have his highlights in the air or the ground or both.kyoun1e said:People getting a bit too jacked up in here.
NE coming off a bad loss. Rarely lose two in a row. And Bill B. is usually very good at taking away weapons.
Not to mention he knows Cassel.
Think somewhat of a bust is coming this week.
And in general, he could be a little up and down this season with big weeks followed by duds but with performance evening out as the season goes on.
Temper expectations.
Ill see ya after the game, sucker.
I actually own C. Patterson myself so I hope I'm WRONG.
I don't necessarily disagree but he is still a flex even if all he gets is 3/4 carries and a handful of returns. Guy is lightning in a bottle.I love Patterson. His future is bright but if you have a decent WR on the bench this week I think you should sit him. He's just not that polished of a WR yet and if they have Revis shadow him 0 receptions is a possibility imo.
Easy there killer.Also, your analysis was garbage. You didnt say anything. LOL- BB knows Cassel..? What does that mean? He hasnt played for NE in 6 years. Just a dumb statement.No problem, sucker.Lol. Thanks for the unbiased analysis there.Rarely being the key word. The Pats will lose this week. They will have no answer for our run game, and in turn our passing game will be better than expected. Patterson will have his highlights in the air or the ground or both.kyoun1e said:People getting a bit too jacked up in here.
NE coming off a bad loss. Rarely lose two in a row. And Bill B. is usually very good at taking away weapons.
Not to mention he knows Cassel.
Think somewhat of a bust is coming this week.
And in general, he could be a little up and down this season with big weeks followed by duds but with performance evening out as the season goes on.
Temper expectations.
Ill see ya after the game, sucker.
I actually own C. Patterson myself so I hope I'm WRONG.
I agree, but if he doesn't get that 67 yard rushing TD everyone would be screaming what a bust he is with 3 catches for 26 yards and 2 rushes for 35 yards.I don't necessarily disagree but he is still a flex even if all he gets is 3/4 carries and a handful of returns. Guy is lightning in a bottle.I love Patterson. His future is bright but if you have a decent WR on the bench this week I think you should sit him. He's just not that polished of a WR yet and if they have Revis shadow him 0 receptions is a possibility imo.
But he did.I agree, but if he doesn't get that 67 yard rushing TD everyone would be screaming what a bust he is with 3 catches for 26 yards and 2 rushes for 35 yards.I don't necessarily disagree but he is still a flex even if all he gets is 3/4 carries and a handful of returns. Guy is lightning in a bottle.I love Patterson. His future is bright but if you have a decent WR on the bench this week I think you should sit him. He's just not that polished of a WR yet and if they have Revis shadow him 0 receptions is a possibility imo.
And i believe he did it in 5 or 6 games straight. I sense a pattern...But he did.I agree, but if he doesn't get that 67 yard rushing TD everyone would be screaming what a bust he is with 3 catches for 26 yards and 2 rushes for 35 yards.I don't necessarily disagree but he is still a flex even if all he gets is 3/4 carries and a handful of returns. Guy is lightning in a bottle.I love Patterson. His future is bright but if you have a decent WR on the bench this week I think you should sit him. He's just not that polished of a WR yet and if they have Revis shadow him 0 receptions is a possibility imo.
He's had 4 rushing TD's in his last 6 games and he's had a receiving or rushing TD in all 6.And i believe he did it in 5 or 6 games straight. I sense a pattern...But he did.I agree, but if he doesn't get that 67 yard rushing TD everyone would be screaming what a bust he is with 3 catches for 26 yards and 2 rushes for 35 yards.I don't necessarily disagree but he is still a flex even if all he gets is 3/4 carries and a handful of returns. Guy is lightning in a bottle.I love Patterson. His future is bright but if you have a decent WR on the bench this week I think you should sit him. He's just not that polished of a WR yet and if they have Revis shadow him 0 receptions is a possibility imo.
Do you think it's possible that number comes down significantly in the near future or do you think we are looking at the #1WR in FF?Patterson averages a TD very 7.875 times he touches the ball. I will not be benching him until that number is significantly higher.
It will likely come down this year. That's a pretty ridiculous pace. While Patterson is capable of being the #1 WR in FF his opportunity and development still need expanded to get there. He's not elite and other guys are. I have a hard time envisioning guys who don't have a real opportunity to catch near 100 balls as the top WR. It's possible given his rushing acumen but it would be unprecedented.Do you think it's possible that number comes down significantly in the near future or do you think we are looking at the #1WR in FF?Patterson averages a TD very 7.875 times he touches the ball. I will not be benching him until that number is significantly higher.
Killer? Im a killer because I dont think your analysis said anything of substance? It didnt. I cant help that.Easy there killer.Also, your analysis was garbage. You didnt say anything. LOL- BB knows Cassel..? What does that mean? He hasnt played for NE in 6 years. Just a dumb statement.No problem, sucker.Lol. Thanks for the unbiased analysis there.Rarely being the key word. The Pats will lose this week. They will have no answer for our run game, and in turn our passing game will be better than expected. Patterson will have his highlights in the air or the ground or both.kyoun1e said:People getting a bit too jacked up in here.
NE coming off a bad loss. Rarely lose two in a row. And Bill B. is usually very good at taking away weapons.
Not to mention he knows Cassel.
Think somewhat of a bust is coming this week.
And in general, he could be a little up and down this season with big weeks followed by duds but with performance evening out as the season goes on.
Temper expectations.
Ill see ya after the game, sucker.
I actually own C. Patterson myself so I hope I'm WRONG.
I mean sucker.
I like that answer. Appreciate it and think it's pretty accurate. He could easily have less than 70 receptions by the end of the year. The question is does he have 5-6 rushing TD's and 700+ yards rushing to go along with those <70 receptions. That would likely vault him into top 10 WR in FF. It would be an odd way to get there though........It will likely come down this year. That's a pretty ridiculous pace. While Patterson is capable of being the #1 WR in FF his opportunity and development still need expanded to get there. He's not elite and other guys are. I have a hard time envisioning guys who don't have a real opportunity to catch near 100 balls as the top WR. It's possible given his rushing acumen but it would be unprecedented.Do you think it's possible that number comes down significantly in the near future or do you think we are looking at the #1WR in FF?Patterson averages a TD very 7.875 times he touches the ball. I will not be benching him until that number is significantly higher.
Bill Belichick: No regrets in Cordarrelle Patterson deal
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000392866/article/bill-belichick-no-regrets-in-cordarrelle-patterson-deal
It's nitpicking I know, but he's had one catch over 25 yards in his career. His 79 yard TD catch was a screen he caught in the backfield.
Negative. Patterson's routes are currently mediocre at best.If Revis plays like he did last week covering Mike Wallace, Patterson will embarrass him.I love Patterson. His future is bright but if you have a decent WR on the bench this week I think you should sit him. He's just not that polished of a WR yet and if they have Revis shadow him 0 receptions is a possibility imo.