When I saw he was playing last night I didn't think much of it but when I saw the results it got my attention. It would be SO like the Patriots to cut him and just roll with Bolden, White, Gray, and Lewis.satch said:Showcasing Blount for a trade to Dallas? Doubt it, but it would be Belichickian, and Dallas is in the market. Wasn't much of a showcase though.
Just picked up Gray. Reward to risk is far too high not to take a chance before week 1.Ilov80s said:I still contend Jonas is the guy to draft. His adp vs potential role is a can't lose proposition.
If Blount is on the bubble and last night was his chance to make the team, he may be cut soon. Didn't look great. With Dallas in the market for a RB, a Blount signing would be interesting to say the least.Saboo said:Blount played deep into the 4th quarter of the final preseason game tonight. It may be that they just want to give him reps as he will miss the first week, but this did catch my eye. Could he be on the bubble?
That is nuts.Fwiw Gray went before Blount in my draft.
I am starting him week 1 over Lat.Murray. That Steelers D is going to give up a lot of points. BB might make me pay for it, but he just has so much TD potential.Just picked up Gray. Reward to risk is far too high not to take a chance before week 1.Ilov80s said:I still contend Jonas is the guy to draft. His adp vs potential role is a can't lose proposition.
He looked fine. He had a gaffe or 2 in the passing game but that's not really his strength. Beat reporters said he was clearly the best back in camp.If Blount is on the bubble and last night was his chance to make the team, he may be cut soon. Didn't look great. With Dallas in the market for a RB, a Blount signing would be interesting to say the least.Saboo said:Blount played deep into the 4th quarter of the final preseason game tonight. It may be that they just want to give him reps as he will miss the first week, but this did catch my eye. Could he be on the bubble?
I agree with this, but with BB you just never know. A trade or cut would surprise but not shock me either.Blount's a tough call this year. Could be a goal line hammer, clock killing monster in a potent offense with a friendly schedule. NE will probably have a lot of early leads and Blount could see a ton of carries as a result. Could be a fantasy RB1, especially if used in the passing game. Or he could be part of a nasty committee, or even get cut.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
Love the 4/54 receiving. The 10/24 rushing, not so much. You're right about camp reports which is why the poor rushing performance surprised me.He looked fine. He had a gaffe or 2 in the passing game but that's not really his strength. Beat reporters said he was clearly the best back in camp.If Blount is on the bubble and last night was his chance to make the team, he may be cut soon. Didn't look great. With Dallas in the market for a RB, a Blount signing would be interesting to say the least.Saboo said:Blount played deep into the 4th quarter of the final preseason game tonight. It may be that they just want to give him reps as he will miss the first week, but this did catch my eye. Could he be on the bubble?
Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
Agreed, I do not get the logic of playing a veteran you expect to be your #1 RB in the 4th quarter of the 4th preseason game because you are worried he will be rusty missing 1 week of football. Does not make sense.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.
On top of missing week one, he missed some camp time with an injury. Combined with getting more reps in the passing game, it's not a stretch to think BB just wanted to get him more time on the field.Agreed, I do not get the logic of playing a veteran you expect to be your #1 RB in the 4th quarter of the 4th preseason game because you are worried he will be rusty missing 1 week of football. Does not make sense.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position. I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
It wasn't a poor rushing performance. His line was awful. He was hit in the backfield several times and had nowhere to go. When he had something to work with he showed patience, power and niftyness in the hole.Love the 4/54 receiving. The 10/24 rushing, not so much. You're right about camp reports which is why the poor rushing performance surprised me.He looked fine. He had a gaffe or 2 in the passing game but that's not really his strength. Beat reporters said he was clearly the best back in camp.If Blount is on the bubble and last night was his chance to make the team, he may be cut soon. Didn't look great. With Dallas in the market for a RB, a Blount signing would be interesting to say the least.Saboo said:Blount played deep into the 4th quarter of the final preseason game tonight. It may be that they just want to give him reps as he will miss the first week, but this did catch my eye. Could he be on the bubble?
Bill Belichick has left Brady in the game deep in 4th quarters of blowout games exposing him to hits. He (in)famously had Gronkowski on the PAT blocking team late in a blowout game where he broke his arm. Wes Welker tore his ACL and missed the playoffs in a meaningless Week 17 game.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.
I have heard this again and again over the years, to which I openly question where this urban legend has come from.To understand the ways of the Patriot RB situation is to understand the mysteries of the universe.
I will leave such complex matters to those much smarter than I.
The fact he had to be placed on the non football injury list because he wasn't close to being able to pass the conditioning test fits your narrative.Pissed off Legarrette Blount had his draft stock plummet after punching a guy, got cut by TEN after punching another, then ran angry once he finally got a chance with TB the second half of 2010. He blew up for most of his 1000/6 the last part of that season.
Once he settled in, content that he had a secure gig, Legarrette Blount showed occasional flashes, then slowly let his performance slide into complete irrelevance over 2011 and 2012.
Pissed off Legarrette Blount was ditched by TB to the Pats, where he languished only long enough to completely explode at the end of the regular season and into the playoffs, famously putting up his 76/2, 189/2, and 166/4 lines in consecutive weeks, and building the "Legarrette Blount scores touchdowns every time he touches the ball as a Patriot" mystique.
After that, he became an attractive option for teams, and signed a decent two year contract with PIT, became content, and promptly quit caring about perfoming so completely that he became useless as an NFL player, a notorious cancer, and utterly unrosterable for the Steelers. They cut him outright.
Pissed off Legarrette Blount had a fistful of 5.0+ ypc games after getting picked up, a handful of multi-TD games, and became an integral part of a SB run.
Now, he's secure in his role, and is once again going to be content Legarrette.
You wanna roll the dice on that history? I'll be first in line to pick him off the FA scrap heap once he inevitably wears out his welcome in NE, but until then, I expect him to blow and ultimately find himself expendable. I believe we're already seeing the first signs of it.
10/24 is a poor rushing performance for the unit as a whole, including Blount and the line.It wasn't a poor rushing performance. His line was awful. He was hit in the backfield several times and had nowhere to go. When he had something to work with he showed patience, power and niftyness in the hole.Love the 4/54 receiving. The 10/24 rushing, not so much. You're right about camp reports which is why the poor rushing performance surprised me.He looked fine. He had a gaffe or 2 in the passing game but that's not really his strength. Beat reporters said he was clearly the best back in camp.If Blount is on the bubble and last night was his chance to make the team, he may be cut soon. Didn't look great. With Dallas in the market for a RB, a Blount signing would be interesting to say the least.Saboo said:Blount played deep into the 4th quarter of the final preseason game tonight. It may be that they just want to give him reps as he will miss the first week, but this did catch my eye. Could he be on the bubble?
Were the starting o-linemen playing?10/24 is a poor rushing performance for the unit as a whole, including Blount and the line. For fantasy purposes, it doesn't really matter who's fault it is. I'll take a bad RB who dominates behind a great line oline over a great RB who has poor rushing performances behind a weak oline.It wasn't a poor rushing performance. His line was awful. He was hit in the backfield several times and had nowhere to go. When he had something to work with he showed patience, power and niftyness in the hole.Love the 4/54 receiving. The 10/24 rushing, not so much. You're right about camp reports which is why the poor rushing performance surprised me.He looked fine. He had a gaffe or 2 in the passing game but that's not really his strength. Beat reporters said he was clearly the best back in camp.If Blount is on the bubble and last night was his chance to make the team, he may be cut soon. Didn't look great. With Dallas in the market for a RB, a Blount signing would be interesting to say the least.Saboo said:Blount played deep into the 4th quarter of the final preseason game tonight. It may be that they just want to give him reps as he will miss the first week, but this did catch my eye. Could he be on the bubble?
I'm honestly not sure, didn't get to see much of the game. But if Blount is their #1 RB I'd be a bit surprised if BB woukd give him that much work, and risk injury behind 2nd stringers.Were the starting o-linemen playing?10/24 is a poor rushing performance for the unit as a whole, including Blount and the line. For fantasy purposes, it doesn't really matter who's fault it is. I'll take a bad RB who dominates behind a great line oline over a great RB who has poor rushing performances behind a weak oline.It wasn't a poor rushing performance. His line was awful. He was hit in the backfield several times and had nowhere to go. When he had something to work with he showed patience, power and niftyness in the hole.Love the 4/54 receiving. The 10/24 rushing, not so much. You're right about camp reports which is why the poor rushing performance surprised me.He looked fine. He had a gaffe or 2 in the passing game but that's not really his strength. Beat reporters said he was clearly the best back in camp.If Blount is on the bubble and last night was his chance to make the team, he may be cut soon. Didn't look great. With Dallas in the market for a RB, a Blount signing would be interesting to say the least.Saboo said:Blount played deep into the 4th quarter of the final preseason game tonight. It may be that they just want to give him reps as he will miss the first week, but this did catch my eye. Could he be on the bubble?
In Blount's last 16 games with NE, he's had 1050/15. I'd take that from a guy that is getting drafted RB29/Pick 77 (based on ADP from the past 10 days at MFL).I'm open to the argument that as a vet min type of guy, he might still be in his "running angry" place. But there's really nothing in his history that suggests he's particularly concerned about being a good soldier so he can profit. He seems to be motivated only when he's cast into the junk heap, and as soon as he has a secure-enough gig that he can slack off and get high as much as he wants, he coasts till he gets another wake up call.
Mentioned earlier that everyone in my league lives in NE. I drafted Blount at 140 overall. Gray went at 87. Just passing along info.Edited to add that I actually texted a league mate post draft asking why nobody wanted Blount. It was weird.In Blount's last 16 games with NE, he's had 1050/15. I'd take that from a guy that is getting drafted RB29/Pick 77 (based on ADP from the past 10 days at MFL).I'm open to the argument that as a vet min type of guy, he might still be in his "running angry" place. But there's really nothing in his history that suggests he's particularly concerned about being a good soldier so he can profit. He seems to be motivated only when he's cast into the junk heap, and as soon as he has a secure-enough gig that he can slack off and get high as much as he wants, he coasts till he gets another wake up call.
It's week 4 of the pre-season. Does the stat line really matter? He was running behind a line made up of 2's and 3's. He looked good given room to run.10/24 is a poor rushing performance for the unit as a whole, including Blount and the line.It wasn't a poor rushing performance. His line was awful. He was hit in the backfield several times and had nowhere to go. When he had something to work with he showed patience, power and niftyness in the hole.Love the 4/54 receiving. The 10/24 rushing, not so much. You're right about camp reports which is why the poor rushing performance surprised me.He looked fine. He had a gaffe or 2 in the passing game but that's not really his strength. Beat reporters said he was clearly the best back in camp.If Blount is on the bubble and last night was his chance to make the team, he may be cut soon. Didn't look great. With Dallas in the market for a RB, a Blount signing would be interesting to say the least.Saboo said:Blount played deep into the 4th quarter of the final preseason game tonight. It may be that they just want to give him reps as he will miss the first week, but this did catch my eye. Could he be on the bubble?
No, doesn't really matter much.It's week 4 of the pre-season. Does the stat line really matter? He was running behind a line made up of 2's and 3's. He looked good given room to run.10/24 is a poor rushing performance for the unit as a whole, including Blount and the line.It wasn't a poor rushing performance. His line was awful. He was hit in the backfield several times and had nowhere to go. When he had something to work with he showed patience, power and niftyness in the hole.Love the 4/54 receiving. The 10/24 rushing, not so much. You're right about camp reports which is why the poor rushing performance surprised me.He looked fine. He had a gaffe or 2 in the passing game but that's not really his strength. Beat reporters said he was clearly the best back in camp.If Blount is on the bubble and last night was his chance to make the team, he may be cut soon. Didn't look great. With Dallas in the market for a RB, a Blount signing would be interesting to say the least.Saboo said:Blount played deep into the 4th quarter of the final preseason game tonight. It may be that they just want to give him reps as he will miss the first week, but this did catch my eye. Could he be on the bubble?
How many other players had that conditioning test that day? How many passed? How many failed?In Blount's last 16 games with NE, he's had 1050/15. I'd take that from a guy that is getting drafted RB29/Pick 77 (based on ADP from the past 10 days at MFL).I'm open to the argument that as a vet min type of guy, he might still be in his "running angry" place. But there's really nothing in his history that suggests he's particularly concerned about being a good soldier so he can profit. He seems to be motivated only when he's cast into the junk heap, and as soon as he has a secure-enough gig that he can slack off and get high as much as he wants, he coasts till he gets another wake up call.
I can look the other way when someone suffers from heat exhaustion on the first day of camp. He came back a day or two later and was knocking guys on their butts and looked like the best player on the field. This is a complete non issue as far as I am concerned.How many other players had that conditioning test that day? How many passed? How many failed?In Blount's last 16 games with NE, he's had 1050/15. I'd take that from a guy that is getting drafted RB29/Pick 77 (based on ADP from the past 10 days at MFL).I'm open to the argument that as a vet min type of guy, he might still be in his "running angry" place. But there's really nothing in his history that suggests he's particularly concerned about being a good soldier so he can profit. He seems to be motivated only when he's cast into the junk heap, and as soon as he has a secure-enough gig that he can slack off and get high as much as he wants, he coasts till he gets another wake up call.
Poor guy, we can't expect him to play a game for millions of dollars in 95 humidity! He deserves a nap.Blount failed a conditioning test on a day that was 95 degrees wioth 95 humidity and their was a health warning locally to avoid spending too much time outside. Trust me, I was out that day and got winded just walking to my car. IMO, way different than if it were a more reasonable temperature and humidity.
I think we probably shouldn't have anyone play any game at 95 degrees with 95% humidity.Poor guy, we can't expect him to play a game for millions of dollars in 95 humidity! He deserves a nap.Blount failed a conditioning test on a day that was 95 degrees wioth 95 humidity and their was a health warning locally to avoid spending too much time outside. Trust me, I was out that day and got winded just walking to my car. IMO, way different than if it were a more reasonable temperature and humidity.
Of all the coaches in the NFL, you don't think hoodie doesn't know what he has in Blount?On top of missing week one, he missed some camp time with an injury. Combined with getting more reps in the passing game, it's not a stretch to think BB just wanted to get him more time on the field.Agreed, I do not get the logic of playing a veteran you expect to be your #1 RB in the 4th quarter of the 4th preseason game because you are worried he will be rusty missing 1 week of football. Does not make sense.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position. I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
He is but those are games that count and part of the Patriots aura is how they don't care to stomp the will out of teams.Bill Belichick has left Brady in the game deep in 4th quarters of blowout games exposing him to hits. He (in)famously had Gronkowski on the PAT blocking team late in a blowout game where he broke his arm. Wes Welker tore his ACL and missed the playoffs in a meaningless Week 17 game.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.
Belichick is a little different animal than most NFL coaches.
Maybe BB just wanted to get him some more work? He also threw to his 2 down hammer 7 times (2nd on the team) on the night. Maybe he doesn't like his passing down options so much and wants to work Blount into the passing game more this year. How about that perspective?He is but those are games that count and part of the Patriots aura is how they don't care to stomp the will out of teams.Bill Belichick has left Brady in the game deep in 4th quarters of blowout games exposing him to hits. He (in)famously had Gronkowski on the PAT blocking team late in a blowout game where he broke his arm. Wes Welker tore his ACL and missed the playoffs in a meaningless Week 17 game.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.
Belichick is a little different animal than most NFL coaches.
I get the perspective but I think just as a business decision on what there is possibly there to gain vs. lose, this is simply not a decision you would make without there being another angle (and the Patriots always have another angle).
You don't think he knows what he has in Tom Brady? Why did he play Brady in preseason at all?Of all the coaches in the NFL, you don't think hoodie doesn't know what he has in Blount?On top of missing week one, he missed some camp time with an injury. Combined with getting more reps in the passing game, it's not a stretch to think BB just wanted to get him more time on the field.Agreed, I do not get the logic of playing a veteran you expect to be your #1 RB in the 4th quarter of the 4th preseason game because you are worried he will be rusty missing 1 week of football. Does not make sense.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position. I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
It's just as valid as any guess I am making or anyone else. Sure. I would question, however, why they would pursue that role with Blount when they have three other Rbs on the team that are better skilled at that role and they are well-known as a team that clearly has that role carved out for their players.Maybe BB just wanted to get him some more work? He also threw to his 2 down hammer 7 times (2nd on the team) on the night. Maybe he doesn't like his passing down options so much and wants to work Blount into the passing game more this year. How about that perspective?He is but those are games that count and part of the Patriots aura is how they don't care to stomp the will out of teams.Bill Belichick has left Brady in the game deep in 4th quarters of blowout games exposing him to hits. He (in)famously had Gronkowski on the PAT blocking team late in a blowout game where he broke his arm. Wes Welker tore his ACL and missed the playoffs in a meaningless Week 17 game.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.
Belichick is a little different animal than most NFL coaches.
I get the perspective but I think just as a business decision on what there is possibly there to gain vs. lose, this is simply not a decision you would make without there being another angle (and the Patriots always have another angle).
Completely different. All the players, if healthy, starters and such, play in the pre-season. Big Ben plays SOMETIME. Peyton Manning plays sometime. But they don't play in the 4th pre-season game. Tom Brady didn't last night.You don't think he knows what he has in Tom Brady? Why did he play Brady in preseason at all?Of all the coaches in the NFL, you don't think hoodie doesn't know what he has in Blount?On top of missing week one, he missed some camp time with an injury. Combined with getting more reps in the passing game, it's not a stretch to think BB just wanted to get him more time on the field.Agreed, I do not get the logic of playing a veteran you expect to be your #1 RB in the 4th quarter of the 4th preseason game because you are worried he will be rusty missing 1 week of football. Does not make sense.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position. I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
Possibly because he covets Blount as his hammer but would like to keep the defense guessing when Blount is in the game?It's just as valid as any guess I am making or anyone else. Sure. I would question, however, why they would pursue that role with Blount when they have three other Rbs on the team that are better skilled at that role and they are well-known as a team that clearly has that role carved out for their players.Maybe BB just wanted to get him some more work? He also threw to his 2 down hammer 7 times (2nd on the team) on the night. Maybe he doesn't like his passing down options so much and wants to work Blount into the passing game more this year. How about that perspective?He is but those are games that count and part of the Patriots aura is how they don't care to stomp the will out of teams.Bill Belichick has left Brady in the game deep in 4th quarters of blowout games exposing him to hits. He (in)famously had Gronkowski on the PAT blocking team late in a blowout game where he broke his arm. Wes Welker tore his ACL and missed the playoffs in a meaningless Week 17 game.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.
Belichick is a little different animal than most NFL coaches.
I get the perspective but I think just as a business decision on what there is possibly there to gain vs. lose, this is simply not a decision you would make without there being another angle (and the Patriots always have another angle).
It is definitely worth considering. They could maybe want to "downsize" and get back to a "do it all" group of people but that doesn't seem to match their philosophy of the past several years.
Possible but is it worth the risk considering you can play a two back system and have that guesswork in the game whenever you want it? You may be right. I do NOT know what they are doing. I just know it looks "off".Possibly because he covets Blount as his hammer but would like to keep the defense guessing when Blount is in the game?It's just as valid as any guess I am making or anyone else. Sure. I would question, however, why they would pursue that role with Blount when they have three other Rbs on the team that are better skilled at that role and they are well-known as a team that clearly has that role carved out for their players.Maybe BB just wanted to get him some more work? He also threw to his 2 down hammer 7 times (2nd on the team) on the night. Maybe he doesn't like his passing down options so much and wants to work Blount into the passing game more this year. How about that perspective?He is but those are games that count and part of the Patriots aura is how they don't care to stomp the will out of teams.Bill Belichick has left Brady in the game deep in 4th quarters of blowout games exposing him to hits. He (in)famously had Gronkowski on the PAT blocking team late in a blowout game where he broke his arm. Wes Welker tore his ACL and missed the playoffs in a meaningless Week 17 game.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.
Belichick is a little different animal than most NFL coaches.
I get the perspective but I think just as a business decision on what there is possibly there to gain vs. lose, this is simply not a decision you would make without there being another angle (and the Patriots always have another angle).
It is definitely worth considering. They could maybe want to "downsize" and get back to a "do it all" group of people but that doesn't seem to match their philosophy of the past several years.
I agree that it's unusual to play starters in game 4 of preseason for the reasons you stated. But I'm having a hard time believing Blount is on the bubble either. He's been awesome for BB when called upon in the past, and has reportedly had an impressive camp. Like I said this morning, maybe it was a trade showcase? What's your take?Completely different. All the players, if healthy, starters and such, play in the pre-season. Big Ben plays SOMETIME. Peyton Manning plays sometime. But they don't play in the 4th pre-season game. Tom Brady didn't last night. The 4th pre-season game is WELL known to be the game that is no man's land for starters and safe players unless the team simply doesn't have the personnel to not play a starter. This is the game you put people in who are clearly on the outs, might be able to generate some trade value, or that the team genuinely has questions about and are on the fence on.You don't think he knows what he has in Tom Brady? Why did he play Brady in preseason at all?Of all the coaches in the NFL, you don't think hoodie doesn't know what he has in Blount?On top of missing week one, he missed some camp time with an injury. Combined with getting more reps in the passing game, it's not a stretch to think BB just wanted to get him more time on the field.Agreed, I do not get the logic of playing a veteran you expect to be your #1 RB in the 4th quarter of the 4th preseason game because you are worried he will be rusty missing 1 week of football. Does not make sense.Just to stir the pot, did Le'Veon Bell play last night? I'm not sure I follow the logic of risking a player you highly value in a meaningless game over what amounts to a week - not at the RB position. I mean, who knows what is scheming in Patriot land but when I cut & Paste names, I just don't get it.I don't see Blount going anywhere, nor do I see him at the back of the depth chart. BB loves him, he's averaged right around 5 ypc in NE, and scored an average of almost a TD per game for the Pats. I think he was playing because he is going to be suspended and this was his last chance to get some work in. On the flip side, I don't think BB loves Gray, so I think Blount's spot and role are secure. And they were trying to get him more involved as a receiver last night.
Because you have SO many players out there that know they are literally playing their last downs of their dreams or are trying to win a job and because there is so little cohesiveness in these units, it gets reckless out there. You have sloppy play. You have those players being too zealous that break people's arms and tear their knees up or concuss them terribly.
You simply do not put starters (not talking about just a guy, but a STARTER) out there in that game unless you have some questions, concerns, etc.
Well he knows what he has in Blount, Gray and Bolden. I think he probably has a pretty good idea in what he has in White and Lewis now too. To date, White has not been reliable in any facet of the game, Lewis on the other hand has looked pretty good catching balls out of the backfield. Cadet unfortunately just can't get healthy.Other side of the coin. How comfortable is BB with the rest of his RB crew?
Not sure where you are going with this. The Pats were the first team to win a SB without a player getting 100 carries. They probably spend less at the RB position than any team in the league (or close to it). At this point, I don't think BB looks at the RB spot and looks at it as a main focus of the team.Other side of the coin. How comfortable is BB with the rest of his RB crew?