Franknbeans
Footballguy
whatever happened to not hitting a Qb low? Oh, only if it's Brady.
Dr Chao was money on that one.It's absolutely a guess. I'd call it an educated guess but that's all it is.That just seems like a guess and the very 'best case scenario'... he other posts stating the worst side of it.OMG this would be awesome! I'm going to try to be optimistic. In the meantime, go Buccos!One can hope:
David J. Chao, MD @ProFootballDoc 43m43 minutes ago
By video, BEN ROETHLISBERGER @steelers has significant MCL. Out today & at least next game Thurs vs @Ravens. Hope no additional damage.
If it's a 6 game injury, I want no piece of RG3. He seems like a cancer.Give it another game. You'll come around.I would rather have VickTrade for RGIII?
So, for the season...This. Honestly I'll even take 3-3 or worse. If this team squeaks in as a WC and the whole offense is healthy, they can beat anyone home or away. The Pats would be the only team in the AFC that would truly scare me but we will deal with that when it happens.No powerhouses. If they can go 4-2 I'll take it. I think that this team with a healthy Big Ben, Bell, Brown and Bryant is as good as anyone in football.Wow. Dodged a massive bullet howitzer shell.
- Ravens
- Chargers
- Chiefs
- Bengals
- Raiders
- Browns
Right now, yes. And Mike Vick's style makes him prone to being hit -- we could be entering the Landry Jones era quicker than anyone imagined.timschochet said:So if Vick goes down, it's Landry Jones?
It sure sounds like it. Tomlin's presser is today because of the short week. Hopefully there will be more information available then.
That's what they reported on the news last night.
I agree, he didn't look real good yesterday. I assume the Ravens are going to stack the line to shut down Bell. It could open up things for the receivers -- if Vick can hit them.Vick didn't look good yesterday. Some very bad throws. Hopefully a few days of full practice with the first team will help with the timing. I'm not confident at all.
Yes. The Steelers enjoyed a very quiet off season but things have not been going the Steelers way since training campgood lord this season is starting to have a feel of going into the ####ter. To no fault of the team. Just ridiculously bad luck.
This is certainly going to be the case early. Hopefully a couple of play action deep completions (which Vick can do better than anything else these days) balances the defense.I agree, he didn't look real good yesterday. I assume the Ravens are going to stack the line to shut down Bell. It could open up things for the receivers -- if Vick can hit them.Vick didn't look good yesterday. Some very bad throws. Hopefully a few days of full practice with the first team will help with the timing. I'm not confident at all.
You could make an argument that Vick's running ability adds a dimension to the 2-pt conversion play. But he isn't anywhere close to Ben as a passer so overall I would say they probably won't be going for 2 for a while unless they need to at the end of the game.I wonder if Tomlin still elects to go for 2 after the first TD. Do the percentages still favor that option even with Vick at QB?
I'm just wondering from a pure statistical standpoint if it makes sense to go for 2 regardless of how crappy your QB is. I don't know the percentages and most coaches don't practice what Tomlin has been doing. But most coaches may not be playing the odds correctly.You could make an argument that Vick's running ability adds a dimension to the 2-pt conversion play. But he isn't anywhere close to Ben as a passer so overall I would say they probably won't be going for 2 for a while unless they need to at the end of the game.I wonder if Tomlin still elects to go for 2 after the first TD. Do the percentages still favor that option even with Vick at QB?
Makes sense to me. As GB said, the odds of making a 2 with Vick back there may not even be reduced at all. I guess we'll find out (assuming he can even get them into the endzone).Tomlin said this won't change the whole 2-point thing.
ILB Ryan Shazier (shoulder) and NT Daniel McCullers (knee) are continuing to work their way back to health, but each will be evaluated with a day-to-day approach by the Steelers. Tomlin said Shazier is experiencing weakness in his shoulder and won't return until he regains his strength in the joint. Tomlin also said the team is taking a wait-and-see approach to CB Cortez Allen's injury (knee) as he looks to return to the field in the coming weeks.
The Steelers suffered two in-game injuries in their victory over the St. Louis Rams on Sunday. James Harrison injured his thumb, but Tomlin didn't think it would hinder his availability this Thursday night. Matt Spaeth fractured his hand and is being fitted for a cast. As his primary job on the team is serving as a blocking tight end, there's hope that Spaeth won't miss any time.
Hopefully they'll have a better option by then.Life without Ben. We'll have to eventually get used to it anyways....
Yeah big difference between this being a 4 game injury or 6 game injury with Cincy being game 5. Either way if we can pull out of this .500 by the time Ben comes back ill be pretty happy.Idiot Boxer said:Gotta imagine a best case scenario is 4 weeks out and 2-2 over that period.
Me too. Going to be tough with Vick though. What really scares me is that Vick has been a turnover machine -- that's the one thing the Steelers cannot afford.Yeah big difference between this being a 4 game injury or 6 game injury with Cincy being game 5. Either way if we can pull out of this .500 by the time Ben comes back ill be pretty happy.Idiot Boxer said:Gotta imagine a best case scenario is 4 weeks out and 2-2 over that period.
Yeah Vick can make the throws and can certainly get the ball deep but he makes very, very poor decisions. He holds onto the ball too long and has poor accuracy. I want him to just be a game manager but that isn't happening.Me too. Going to be tough with Vick though. What really scares me is that Vick has been a turnover machine -- that's the one thing the Steelers cannot afford.Yeah big difference between this being a 4 game injury or 6 game injury with Cincy being game 5. Either way if we can pull out of this .500 by the time Ben comes back ill be pretty happy.Idiot Boxer said:Gotta imagine a best case scenario is 4 weeks out and 2-2 over that period.
Biggest reason I did not like this signing when it happened: If Vick were forced into action, and now he has been, the Steelers' defense isn't good enough for the amount of times Vick is likely to hand the ball over to the other team.What really scares me is that Vick has been a turnover machine
Yeah. A lot of my friends didn't like the Vick signing for off the field reasons. I didn't like it for on the field reasons. He's not a good fit for our offense. I'd rather have Matt Cassel or Jimmy Clausen running our offense right now. A left-handed risk taker isn't what we need.Biggest reason I did not like this signing when it happened: If Vick were forced into action, and now he has been, the Steelers' defense isn't good enough for the amount of times Vick is likely to hand the ball over to the other team.What really scares me is that Vick has been a turnover machine
Most likely gonna be ugly.
The defense is probably somewhere in between the Pats game and the 9ers/Rams games but it is much better than I expected. They have talented athletes that are starting to become football players.Biggest reason I did not like this signing when it happened: If Vick were forced into action, and now he has been, the Steelers' defense isn't good enough for the amount of times Vick is likely to hand the ball over to the other team.What really scares me is that Vick has been a turnover machine
Most likely gonna be ugly.
You would not want Clausen running the offense. Not a defense of Vick but that's just a bad statement. I thought Landry actually made some good reads during preseason but was hurt by the derelict talent he was throwing to. I expect a lot of screens to AB and a high volume amount of carries to Bell/DeAngelo even if the score isn't in our favor.Yeah. A lot of my friends didn't like the Vick signing for off the field reasons. I didn't like it for on the field reasons. He's not a good fit for our offense. I'd rather have Matt Cassel or Jimmy Clausen running our offense right now. A left-handed risk taker isn't what we need.Just gotta try to stay afloat.Biggest reason I did not like this signing when it happened: If Vick were forced into action, and now he has been, the Steelers' defense isn't good enough for the amount of times Vick is likely to hand the ball over to the other team.What really scares me is that Vick has been a turnover machine
Most likely gonna be ugly.
Clausen is a better fit, imo, for this offense in the short term than Vick. Not saying he's a better player. Chicago is a dumpster fire. He'd do much better behind our line with our skill players.You would not want Clausen running the offense. Not a defense of Vick but that's just a bad statement. I thought Landry actually made some good reads during preseason but was hurt by the derelict talent he was throwing to. I expect a lot of screens to AB and a high volume amount of carries to Bell/DeAngelo even if the score isn't in our favor.Yeah. A lot of my friends didn't like the Vick signing for off the field reasons. I didn't like it for on the field reasons. He's not a good fit for our offense. I'd rather have Matt Cassel or Jimmy Clausen running our offense right now. A left-handed risk taker isn't what we need.Just gotta try to stay afloat.Biggest reason I did not like this signing when it happened: If Vick were forced into action, and now he has been, the Steelers' defense isn't good enough for the amount of times Vick is likely to hand the ball over to the other team.What really scares me is that Vick has been a turnover machine
Most likely gonna be ugly.
Not short at all.That begs a really ugly questiontoo...
How short is Vick's leash. I think they may have to go to Landry if he struggles.