freeannyong
Footballguy
When do you expect this to be live?
Any further update on this?
Let me ask Devin about that ...Awesome product! However, I do notice that the projected points listed in the interactive chart do not match the projected DK points from Devin's posted projections. The value chart projects AJ Oullette for 31.9 points and Devins projections say 29.8 points just to give one example.
FanDueldo you guys have weekly statline projections anywhere? I know you have projected fantasy points in the value chart, but is there also a plan to release individual stat lines? (completions/attempts, receptions, yards, TDs).
if not, can there be?
thank you!FanDueldo you guys have weekly statline projections anywhere? I know you have projected fantasy points in the value chart, but is there also a plan to release individual stat lines? (completions/attempts, receptions, yards, TDs).
if not, can there be?
DraftKings
I'm not sure. We're still finding our rhythm, and so are FanDuel and DraftKings. They've finally released early Saturday game slates (along with Thursday). The CFB crew is getting their projections done and then the IVCs will go up just after that. But I honestly don't have an ETA for when all of that will regularly occur in future weeks. It will help greatly if the hosting sites release their game slates earlier.Any idea what the regular release schedule for these is going to be ?
I can do that. I commented that part of the code out during Week 1 because I didn't know whether projections would be updated after initial posting, but I'll restore it for this week.It would be nice if the IVC for college football noted the date and time of the last update to the projections like it does for NFL.
Yeah definitely don't rely on the chart alone. It's good but there's always a couple random outliers at the top of the value or h-value list that don't belong. What I've been doing and have been successful with is combining the value chart with the slate breakdowns.Quick question about the Draftkings chart. I'm taking my first dip in the CFB pool. I know zero about CFB but based on some comments by Maurile in another thread I'm going to try it out on a very small scale. I am relying 100% on the interactive chart to try out some small cash games.
My problem so far has been lining up contests I want to enter with the players actually listed in the chart. I have tinkered around with the tabs for early, late, night, etc. I get that different contests are for different time blocks. However, I still can't seem to easily and quickly assemble a lineup for a given contest as many of the players suggested by the chart are not even in the Draftkings slate of players. They have either played already or are not in the Draftkings list at all. I tried manually removing players from the chart but even that seemed to be a dead end and was taking too long given that I have no idea who has played, who plays when and who these guys even are.
Am I doing something wrong? This is definitely not a complaint about the chart as it is awesome. Just wondering if there is a quick solution or does it just require a bit more leg work on my end. Thanks!
Completely agree with this approach, which is why we are doing slate breakdowns. From a projections standpoint, we created projections for 650 players across all FBS teams. This is an increase of about 300 from last week, and as we continue to have data there will be additional players added. The challenge is from a projections standpoint creating projections for players who have an unclear role in the offense.Yeah definitely don't rely on the chart alone. It's good but there's always a couple random outliers at the top of the value or h-value list that don't belong. What I've been doing and have been successful with is combining the value chart with the slate breakdowns.Quick question about the Draftkings chart. I'm taking my first dip in the CFB pool. I know zero about CFB but based on some comments by Maurile in another thread I'm going to try it out on a very small scale. I am relying 100% on the interactive chart to try out some small cash games.
My problem so far has been lining up contests I want to enter with the players actually listed in the chart. I have tinkered around with the tabs for early, late, night, etc. I get that different contests are for different time blocks. However, I still can't seem to easily and quickly assemble a lineup for a given contest as many of the players suggested by the chart are not even in the Draftkings slate of players. They have either played already or are not in the Draftkings list at all. I tried manually removing players from the chart but even that seemed to be a dead end and was taking too long given that I have no idea who has played, who plays when and who these guys even are.
Am I doing something wrong? This is definitely not a complaint about the chart as it is awesome. Just wondering if there is a quick solution or does it just require a bit more leg work on my end. Thanks!
First, make sure you are looking at the Week 2 chart, not the Week 1 chart that was linked earlier in this thread (last week).My problem so far has been lining up contests I want to enter with the players actually listed in the chart. I have tinkered around with the tabs for early, late, night, etc. I get that different contests are for different time blocks. However, I still can't seem to easily and quickly assemble a lineup for a given contest as many of the players suggested by the chart are not even in the Draftkings slate of players. They have either played already or are not in the Draftkings list at all. I tried manually removing players from the chart but even that seemed to be a dead end and was taking too long given that I have no idea who has played, who plays when and who these guys even are.
Am I doing something wrong? This is definitely not a complaint about the chart as it is awesome. Just wondering if there is a quick solution or does it just require a bit more leg work on my end. Thanks!
Ricky Jones and Jordan Howard were outliers earlier in the week. We didn't notice that there were two players with each of those names, and the IVC was combining them (using the salary for one Ricky Jones and the projection for the other Ricky Jones) making him look like a great bargain even though he wasn't. Same with Howard.Yeah definitely don't rely on the chart alone. It's good but there's always a couple random outliers at the top of the value or h-value list that don't belong. What I've been doing and have been successful with is combining the value chart with the slate breakdowns.
This is something we can add for week 3.Yeah, this looks to be a short experiment with an inactive guy in my first two lineups. Does FBGs have a Saturday morning inactive list like they do for Sunday morning? I can't locate one.
It really depends on the dumpster fire and the players involved. College football is so difficult because you really have to understand the system and the mentality of of the head coach.http://collegefootball.ap.org/article/freshman-qb-heard-propels-texas-over-rice-42-28
If Ive learned one thing from this season so far it is to stay away from the dumpster fires, even more so than the NFL, because theres so much volatility. With so many teams there is always going to be a reliable, if not always exciting option somewhere on the slate.
Here's the problem with Skov. He is likely only to get 15 carries and is facing a great defensive lineman in Sheldon Day and the best middle linebacker in recent college football memory in Jaylon Smith.Can I get one of the Football guys opinions on Skov this week? His price is super deflated from all the blowouts he has been off the field for. Is his H-value a reflection of the computer using those stats, or do you not like him this week even at that price?