Olsen for Hyde (1 Viewer)

I also have Gronk and my other RBs are Gurley, Mathews, Abdullah so I need some more depth. Is this a good trade? I could arguably try to get a better return, but this doesn't look bad

Tough call. Olsen is elite at the TE spot and Hyde is around RB10-15. I would rather trade Gronk and get something more added to Hyde. Olsen is just as good as Gronk maybe even better because he can stay on the field.

Interesting, so maybe move Gronk instead

i would tend think you could get better than Hyde for either Gronk or Olsen.

BUT....i had a wealth of TEs last year in a league (olsen being one) and i could never get anyone to offer anything decent in trade. people under-value the position to a fault.

can you play Gronk & Olsen in a flex? probably better off doing that then trading for Hyde.

https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/748318-miller-ingram-t-coleman-pick-2/

If you can flex a TE then I'd dangle both Olsen and Gronk out there and see what the best offer is, but unless its a deal you really like just keep them both and flex one of them.  Nothing is forcing you to make a trade as long as you can play them both every week.  I would definitely want a better RB than Hyde though.