Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Technically it should have been called because the Cowboys defenders hands did in fact make contact with Bradfords helmet, but do you honestly believe it was a aggregeous,or even a hard hit to Bradfords head? To me it was almost inadvertent and occurred after Bradford released the ball.
I dont like the rule at all. I think it's stupid.
At live game speed I completely understand having a missed call or incorrect call. It's when there are reviewed plays and it seems like it's a call that 9/10 people would see one way but the ref reviewing the play sees it the other and it's obviously incorrect.
I agree that Cam should have gotten some calls too. Some were very obvious and others are in a gray area because of the amount he runs. Some of the hits he takes are questionable. There was nothing questionable about what happened to Bradford last night. I'm not even sure what the purpose of mentioning Cam was, he has nothing to do with this.
Yep, and Cam has gotten those calls before but there are a lot that have not been called against him. The issue of not making those calls against Cam is part of the whole argument about refs missing calls.
And my point was it's not always called
If this is the case, they need to make penalties challengeable/reviewable then.
If they just handled all reviews during a commercial break then we wouldn't even notice the game slowing down. Instead though, we get a review and watch 8 replays to then have the ref come back to tell us the opposite of what we all saw and then go to commercial.
I lived in Holland for about 2 years total....television in general is better because nekked bewbs, but specific to your point, they'll play a television show uninterrupted, then between shows they'll show 15 mins of commercials. So so so much better. Plus nekked bewbs.
Sounds like a fantasy land. I want to visit.I lived in Holland for about 2 years total....television in general is better because nekked bewbs, but specific to your point, they'll play a television show uninterrupted, then between shows they'll show 15 mins of commercials. So so so much better. Plus nekked bewbs.
ETA: and I'm talking nekked bewbs on shampoo commercials, not just on shows/movies.
Well, that plus legal weed, which back in the 90s was kind of a big deal. Nowadays notsomuch.
I agree. I think all calls should be reviewable, but don't let that stop you from assuming you know what I think and speak for me.
Is there any chance your name is Ludo?I lived in Holland for about 2 years total....television in general is better because nekked bewbs, but specific to your point, they'll play a television show uninterrupted, then between shows they'll show 15 mins of commercials. So so so much better. Plus nekked bewbs.
ETA: and I'm talking nekked bewbs on shampoo commercials, not just on shows/movies.
I'll take the over. 1 call is almost a given (so NFL can say "see, he gets his calls") might even be of the Bradford variety.
"History" is self explanatory.
Yes, that’s the call. It was lose when he hit the pylon even though he had control when he hit the ground.
ball was clearly more than just "loose" when he hit the pylon. This is a case where it might well be hate the rule instead of the ref.
the ball loose at one point was in-disputable...the darn thing rolled over 180 degrees between his arms. The tough part to figure is when he got control back, and where was he on the field when he did so. And THATs the part most are arguing lacks indisputable evidence to overturn
Technically, if the ball is loose before the player breaks the plane and it hits the pylon or the player doesn't regain control before being out of bounds it IS a fumble through the end zone. Player doesn't have to lose the ball completely - just for that key moment.
Watched a couple shots and it looks like the Jets got hosed.
The officials said it was an obvious call. Per the rules, once the ball became loose, ASJ had to regain possession of the ball AND reestablish himself on the field. Just like he was making a catch. He had to maintain control of the ball going to the ground.DropKick said:
This is the key part. I get the argument for why it would not be a TD, but I didn't see enough to REVERSE the call. Totally f-ed up that it was reversed.
Both. I believe the suits called it and the ref concurred.
