Just being polite and responding to those wanting to talk about it. Is that a problem?I would get tired of repeating myself 10+ times too.
Sure a lot of...you need to see it my way....going on here,
Last edited by a moderator:
Just being polite and responding to those wanting to talk about it. Is that a problem?I would get tired of repeating myself 10+ times too.
I counted 17 responses by him on the previous page alone. Not sure what they said because I blocked him 3 months ago.....but, ya know see it my way stuff.I would get tired of repeating myself 10+ times too.
I want all the input I can get, love to see what others think which is what these forums are all about. To play that ignore thing, ?????I counted 17 responses by him on the previous page alone. Not sure what they said because I blocked him 3 months ago.....but, ya know see it my way stuff.
funny. because you have basically ignored every logical counter point to your illogical weight on 8th grade tweets and biased 3rd hand interview critiquesI want all the input I can get, love to see what others think which is what these forums are all about. To play that ignore thing, ?????
I talked about letting all that go a couple of times. My real thing was how many things we have to let go with the guy.funny. because you have basically ignored every logical counter point to your illogical weight on 8th grade tweets and biased 3rd hand interview critiques
ok guy.I talked about letting all that go a couple of times. My real thing was how many things we have to let go with the guy.
How about you slow down and actually wait and see how this goes down before all that? If the guy is a success then all my stuff was a load of worthless BS, but....if it goes down like I think it will.....then I was right on and nailed it.ok guy.
Did you find out if he is a member of the clean plate club yet? because that probably has more worth than an 8th grade tweet.
You make a big deal about a bunch of garbage and then criticize that everyone is "letting so much go."
yeah... we are letting it go because it's a complete waste of time
The joke is on all of us though. you've managed to spark up about 2 pages worth of discussion on this ####.
I'll just follow what many others have already done. ✌
No, we aren't saying you are the only one talking about negatives. We ARE saying you are clogging up the thread using the same arguments over and over even after plenty of people have offered quite a bit of information as to why your sources or arguments are biased or don't apply to his ability to play football.How about you slow down and actually wait and see how this goes down before all that? If the guy is a success then all my stuff was a load of worthless BS, but....if it goes down like I think it will.....then I was right on and nailed it.
Do you post other places than here? If you do are you saying I'm the only one talking about the negatives involved with this guy?
One thing I have noticed about his place which is different is this. It's real important you just go along with the popular opInion, don't make waves. I;m starting to think that is the best way to go here, just.....yep, you got it.
They state it as fact but they do not say 'formal' negotiations have taken place but players do not take agents to visits so this isn't the norm. It is reasonable to speculate that they have begun negotiations and they even further speculate that one of the terms that they will work out is a non-baseball stipulation years which is reasonable since they would not want him having second thoughts.Cardinals Already in Negotiations with Kyler Murray: Fact
...Murray's agent, Erik Burkhardt, went with Murray on his visit to the Cardinals:
"It would make sense for the Cardinals to want to get Murray signed to an agreement that includes a no-baseball clause before putting his name on the first 2019 draft card. … If Murray ends up signing a contract at the time he's picked, the negotiations leading up to that deal are something that everyone will keep quiet until the moment Burkhardt produces the final draft from his briefcase in the green room."
Given the MLB angle, there would certainly be something for the two sides to work out ahead of time.
The Cardinals aren't going to pass on a Heisman Trophy winner with a rare skill set, especially if new head coach Kliff Kingsbury wants him. The fact they invested a first-round pick in Josh Rosen a year ago is a bit unfortunate, but it also gives them leverage to add more draft assets this year. Murray is the probable pick, so the fact that both sides could be talking shop behind the scenes seems obvious enough.
The first link talks about how they arent taking him, but the 2nd says its fact his agent went with.
The first link is from a guy who posts breaking stories on virtually everything. Of the last 17 articles he wrote only 2 were NFL related. The others were, NBA, MLB, NHL, in addition he's got stories on WWE, golf, college hoops, and even a story devoted to the TV game show Jeopardy. His information on the Cards not taking Murray comes from a single source writer, Pete Prisco of CBS sports who broke that story but no other independent confirmations have come other than Pete.@Bracie Smathers I saw that too. Faust posted this in the 2019 thread:
The first link talks about how they arent taking him, but the 2nd says its fact his agent went with.
It was confusing to read that first article after hearing that his agent was present.The first link is from a guy who posts breaking stories on virtually everything. Of the last 17 articles he wrote only 2 were NFL related. The others were, NBA, MLB, NHL, in addition he's got stories on WWE, golf, college hoops, and even a story devoted to the TV game show Jeopardy. His information on the Cards not taking Murray comes from a single source writer, Pete Prisco of CBS sports who broke that story but no other independent confirmations have come other than Pete.
The second guy writes only on two subjects the NFL and wresting. Of his last 17 articles 12 were NFL stories and 5 on wresting. His story notes Florio of NBC. Florio states a fact. Burkhardt was seen with Murray in Arizona. Arizona can't deny that highly unusual move so their denials state Burkhardt did not go into their facilities.
The video at the top of that page goes into further detail why that is significant. It seems like negotiations have begun so that would mean more than one unconfirmed single source story or second hand stories coming from the same single source.
and he went to two different colleges too, not sure if he "quit" thoughdidnt wilson quit on baseball too?
he technically quit on NC State. He could have played 1 more year there but opted to go to UW-Madison.and he went to two different colleges too, not sure if he "quit" though
either way I don't hold it against any college kid to switch schools, screw themhe technically quit on NC State. He could have played 1 more year there but opted to go to UW-Madison.
nope. me neither. just like I dont hold it against Murray, or penalize him for choosing football over baseball. it's a ridiculous argument.either way I don't hold it against any college kid to switch schools, screw them
Bingo!People who tune in to the draft, are tuning in no matter if the #1 pick is a 100% lock or not.
No one purposely misses the #1 pick because they know who it is.
Colin Cowherd and Joe CLATT not Clack had a disagreement last year about the guy who would go #1 off the board.urn on the Cowherd Show my morning routine with my coffee. According to him the Cards are moving off Murray. Well what he read/heard.
This really is getting interesting now, some suspense is always good, a mystery is cool.
So later in his show he nterviews Joe Klack a guy who seems to know football,(more NCAA) according to him that report is bogus and Murray will be a Card.
Colin Cowherd and Joe CLATT not Clack had a disagreement last year about the guy who would go #1 off the board.
Colin Cowherd Believes Baker Mayfield Is Undraftable
Herd w/Colin Cowherd✔@TheHerd
"There's a police video of Baker Mayfield running from cops. I can't get past that... Undraftable. Off my board." — @ColinCowherd
3:02 PM - Feb 22, 2018
------------------------------------
Joel Klatt Gives Colin Cowherd a Sneak Peek at Nightmarish World He'll Live in if Baker Mayfield Keeps Winning
Because Cowherd dug his heels so deeply on this one, he’ll have a hard time living it down if Mayfield continues to succeed and becomes an elite NFL quarterback. And while that’s a big if, fellow Fox Sports football guy Joe Klatt provided his co-worker with a glimpse into what such an existence will look like.
Colin Cowherd should’ve known Mayfield wouldn’t take half-baked criticism lying down.
...Cowherd insinuated that Mayfield is a bad teammate for ... not celebrating every single touchdown by joining his teammates in the end zone?
MVP Favorite Patrick Mahomes Is No Andrew Luck, Says Analyst
---------------------------
Cowherd is the stereotypical light weight shock jock.
Cowherd takes are not just wrong they are laughably wrong and then he won't admit he's wrong.I didn't say anything about anything other than it was talked about.
Cowherd is wrong all the time but wasn't talking about any opinions.
I got the impression Cowherd was simply going with this.Cowherd takes are not just wrong they are laughably wrong and then he won't admit he's wrong.
He said Murray won't go number one, last year he said Baker Mayfield was undraftable and then double downed by saying he was a bad team mate and he continues to die on that hill. Joe Klatt called him out on his poor take and he should have. Baker Mayfield called him out but he shouldn't have because it boosted the shnook's ratings.
Now Cowherd says Murray won't go number one and Clatt said it was a false report.
I'll go with the guy who isn't a buffoon and doesn't make horrible takes.
Apple cider vinegar the way to go here.yeah if a guy can pick against the spread with 60% accuracy then that certainly means he has the ability to criticize qb prospects.
That's like saying my primary care doctor was able to freeze my wart off with one treatment, so I trust him to perform cardiac surgery on me.
You must not know anything about ATS wagering.yeah if a guy can pick against the spread with 60% accuracy then that certainly means he has the ability to criticize qb prospects.
That's like saying my primary care doctor was able to freeze my wart off with one treatment, so I trust him to perform cardiac surgery on me.
You must not know anything about ATS wagering.
You can't think ..one....game is any indication of anything. Bottom line with gambling is the season results. Using the reg season to build you bank roll so when playoff time comes you are playing with their $$$$$.You can’t be seriously going there again. Not after you dropped trou so badly in front of everyone the last time.
Where do you get that stuff, what's wrong with reality?bizarro world... where body language, 14 year old locker room talk, and the opinion of someone who is half decent at gambling trumps anything else: stats, college production, and expert consensus.
You linked a story that goes back to the first single source of Pete Prisco.I got the impression Cowherd was simply going with this.
https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/49ers/nfl-draft-rumors-cardinals-will-not-take-kyler-murray-no-1-pick
As opposed to his opinion.
Cowherd picks NFL games ATS every Friday during the NFL season, he hits around 60% which is right there with any pro player. Anyone who can do that knows football. I'm into ATS wagering and have been for a long time, I hit 58-62%.
The Wonderlic is like any other metric. By itself, it can mean very little. There have been some really good QBs with a Wonderlic under 20.Wonderlic scores QB;'s
43 Ryan Finley (re-test; scored 28 the first time)
42 Gardner Minshew
37 Daniel Jones
32 Easton Stick
32 Clayton Thorson
31 Trace McSorley
30 Will Grier
28 Brett Rypien
27 Jarrett Stidham
26 Drew Lock
25 Tyree Jackson
25 Dwayne Haskins
22 Sean McGuire
20 Kyler Murray
My opinion came way before becoming aware of this which I just found out about today.
I can't believe it. I agree with FJThe Wonderlic is like any other metric. By itself, it can mean very little. There have been some really good QBs with a Wonderlic under 20.
I won't speak to what I think of Murray until after my rookie draft, but scoring a 20 doesn't worry me (in general).
I highly doubt it but its possibleWhat’s the earliest you would draft Kyler Murray in a QB1 league? Wondering if he will make it to me at 2.10
By Drafting him or by Not Drafting him?Cards going to blow this arent they?
Nope. Not if he goes 1.01.What’s the earliest you would draft Kyler Murray in a QB1 league? Wondering if he will make it to me at 2.10
by passing on him, I don't believe in Rosen.Deamon said:By Drafting him or by Not Drafting him?
in that he'll slide to the bottom of the first? ya, maybe.Gachi said:Anybody else think this guy is Aaron Rodgers’ doppelgänger?
When Russell Wilson entered the league.I really dig @ZenoRazon. He's like having your old drunk uncle over Thanksgiving dinner. It's an adventure, and even if he's annoying at times, at least it's entertaining.
Keep it coming Zeno!
They have that test for a reason, yes it does matter. Notice a guy like Ivy Leaguer Ryan Fitzpatrick scored a gaudy 48 which you would expect.Football Jones said:The Wonderlic is like any other metric. By itself, it can mean very little. There have been some really good QBs with a Wonderlic under 20.
I won't speak to what I think of Murray until after my rookie draft, but scoring a 20 doesn't worry me (in general).