Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I'm not on the right. People post tweets on here all the time. The problem isn't posting tweets, it's the substance. I'd hazard a guess that the tweets you post are annoying because they're uniformly partisan (and I might add, low info in general).
Hypocrite if it is directed to an African American. Racist if directed to non-AA POC.
Sure. It might not be racist, it might just be ignorant or misguided.jamny said:
I won't argue with that. Trump deserves criticism for both his tweet and for not shutting down the chant that night.
So you keep telling us, but given your posts in numerous threads, that claim is not too terribly convincing.
ren hoek said:
I guess, but if it's derivative of Yass Queen, which is derivative of something else, then I'm lost.
If you ever have to wonder if ren on the left or right, the fact that he quotes from a site known as “Electronic Intifada” might just give it away.
Yeah, it's not a word. Derivative of horoscope, not of the other word you may be thinking of. I didn't even think that until you straight-faced me and I tried to figure out why.Horoscopic?
Huh. I just thought he was an anarchist period. I'm sure if ancap functioned smoothly, Ren would have little problem with it. But the first blow must be struck against the hugeness of the fascist state.
No gotcha at all as we always looks for labels here. At a local coffee shop in Metro-Detroit a black clerk told a muslim family to go back to their own country where they came from. So what do we label that?
I’ve suspected as much, you can see sometimes where the chant gets out ahead of his next line.
Why?
And Hell Toupee essentially admitted it was orchestrated when he calls the chants at the rally part of "pomp and circumstance"
Besides finding his Roy Cohn, Trump also needs to find his Leni Riefenstahl, a filmographer who can capture his rallies into some sort of propaganda video or commercial.
While it may very well be choreographed, Hell Toupee has no idea about this one way or the other.
Sure. Suppose the “send her back” chant wasn’t choreographed, but a natural spur of the moment cry without any plan to it: do you regard this as better for those who chanted it (in terms of how they should be regarded) or worse?
The president was a tv celebrity, and he made her, a tv celebrity who had at least worked in a prior White House, a White House adviser.
I saw only a little of this but it was a pretty interesting panel. Manigault, Michael Caputo, Mooch, the woman who was Trump's former CEO at Trump Org (name escape me...), and a former NYC councilman who was a long time Trump confidante.
I don't like it at all.
This has come up a fair bit in the SDNY and Mueller investigations - who do you think comes out of such organizations, normal, reliable, honest people? No, this is the sort of person Trump surrounds himself with.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
That's part of Trump's entire philosophy of life, though.
Id argue most now don’t like her...are doing so because they believe in the propaganda of what they have been told about her by very dishonest sources.
You know, I really don’t object to most of this. The thing is, the progressive left is in the limelight right now; the right/libertarian circles like Ron Paul, Daniel McAdams, Justin Raimondo (RIP), Scott Horton, The American Conservative folks have fallen out of favor.
I don't think she's disloyal. I think she's mistaken about all sorts of policy issues.
She's loyal to the United States, but disloyal to Trump personally. I suspect that's what the previous poster meant.
The "Women of color" tag is offensive. My wife is Hispanic and despises that term, I am half-Hispanic. To lump all of us into one group loses our real identity as we all have totally different backgrounds and come from totally different parts of the globe.
Would you prefer non-white?
Nobody was lumping Hispanics in with people of color. A significant fraction of Hispanics are as white as snow. The four women Trump was talking about are non-white, which is what makes them people of color.
I understand but Trump would bash any congressperson he has an issue with the same way. Not just the "color" of the person. I heard a person on the radio today saying the "colored women" of congress so that term must be making a comeback as well.
Now there's a good source.
Exactly. She's vocal in her disgust with Trump, his Presidency, and what's he's done to our country. To the average Trump fan, that apparently means she "hates America." If that's the bar we're setting, then I guess I proudly "hate America" too.
