Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
One thing they are doing is looking at any other pescriptions you have has filled to make sure there aren’t drug interactions that could be harmful. Many people get medications from multiple specialist doctors who may not know everything else a patient is taking.
Doubtful. This stuff has been online for decades.
Although I do not suppose that either of us knows anything really beautiful and good, I am better off than he is – for he knows nothing, and thinks that he knows. I neither know nor think that I know.
Ha ha ha ha..OK..Fair enough
Would you feel the same about the belief that a society of angels live in the center of the moon and, depending on their mood, vote to provide miracles to those of us on earth? It's impossible to prove otherwise, so it must be valid.
Sure, I guess. But the specificity of such a thing is way less easy to posit than the nebulous thought of "creator".
A lot of smart folks believe in the multiverse theory, thus it’s possible your moon angels exist.
So in your theory, everything was just there and has always been there? Seems kind of far fetched.
I really only saw this when I traveled to Central or South America. In Venezuela, they had a saran wrap machine that you put some money in and it would wrap it at the check in counter. So I think it originates from there.
I always thought that security opened it couldn't close it b/c its so backed with crap so just saran wrap it shut.
No, there are places near check-in counters where you can pay to have them saran wrap your luggage.
No way would this work. Even if it took longer, people would definitely choose to stand in six lines of 4 people at 6 registers than one line of 20 people at 6 registers. Total psychology thing.
I don't think this is just limited to sports. I think it's everything nowadays. Sometimes, stuff just happens.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
In the pre-DNA/pre-videocamera days, it was thought that if you couldn't identify the suspect within X number of years, then the case wouldn't be strong enough to get a conviction (due to fading memories, deteriorating evidence, etc.).
Keeps it fresh?
Depending on how much time and effort is invested adhering to the religious dogma, you might end up on the losing side of the bet.
